cwsox

Apu, as there is silence in regards to the Bush administration's continual betrayl of our troops so there will be silence in the inept way in which the Bush adminsitration - unlike the Clinton administration which protected the homeland from terrorism, the attempt at LAX - there will be silence on this article. more to be silent about

get a room, guys... happy anniversary

Amazing she can do every morning talk show and can't testifiy under oath. Always the excuses... heard them so many time. And it turns out in every instance bull. It sure would he harmful to the US to talk about what happened in 2001. Or is that, just, harmful to Bush? Amazing she can do every morning talk show and can't testifiy under oath. Amazing she can do every morning talk show and can't testifiy under oath. Amazing she can do every morning talk show and can't testifiy under oath. Amazing she can do every morning talk show and can't testifiy under oath. Amazing she can do every morning talk show and can't testifiy under oath.

I disagree with you. You are leaving out a whole half of the conflict. And you are leaving out a lot of UN work.

Biush has slashed all kinds of expenditures for the troops and the generals ain't happy with him either remember it was Bush who attempted to take away their combat pay and it was Kerry and other Dems who protested vehemently and got it restored it was Bush 'early out" of the reserves who is refusing the current reserves out even on their out dates the image is not the same as the substance the image is not at all the same as the reality and if you think Bush is any damn good for American security - he has stretched so thin militarily now and we just sent 2,000 more troops in Afghanistan that if another crisis looms, it is questionable how it will be handled, if it can be Hollywood knows G W looks so cool in his military gear but image ain't reality and ain't it curious Clarke says what he does and Rice refuses to testify in public but now wants more secret testimony: if she testifies in public, will she be (1) bringing down Bush by telling the truth or (2) commiting perjury for lying under oath? Amazing she can do every morning talk show and can't testifiy under oath

that's unfair geopolitical and realistic analogy the difference is the same as killing me (not incendiary) and killing Kerry - we are both human being but the political significance of the acts are very different killing a leader of Hamas is incendiary there is a not a resolution every time Paletstinians are killed either but if Hamas takes out Sharon, then you will have thew quid pro quo and that be likewise be... incendiary? just revenge? what?

typo fixed

If Syria considers Bush a terrorist, are they free to kill him with no condemnation from the UN because they are killing a terrorist? I am certainly not advocating anything. I am saying think thius through from an international perspective since the whole world is not us. What Israel did should IMO be condemned because it was an act of pouring gasoline onto a fire.

I think he has not attended because this administration isn't even allowing photographs or coverage of the bodies being returned home, they want to pretend there are no dead. That would be "downer" in the PR campaign to pretend this is all happy and jolly.

you don't want them I got mine today too these are the ugliest tickets they have ever printed ugly!!!!!!

An A for the wise student in economics, yu are exactly right, and thank for the insightful thinking and sharing it - you are ahead of others older than you in wisdom

570 some americans killed, God knows how many dead Iraqis for this war on false pretenses, but Bush mocks the search for WOMD , the same Buish has hasn't attended a dead armed forces member's funeral yet but he can make jokes!

I am for Nevada cuz they would be the best team to f*** it all up! No one has Nevada in the Final 4 or as champion

Then nuke, tell me that you hate me for my point of view. That you hate. That you hate me for my point of view. Because I am one of them. So you hate me for my point of view. Tell me that. I have disagreed with you often and also spoke of respecting you for putting your ass on the firing line. much as my son the Marine is, and I pray for you both and your comrades. Knowing that, again, tell me now how you hate me because I am one of them. (Be aware when my Marine son hears you called me or my views antiAmerican he will have issues with you...)

points for being funny!

whoa here a minute YASNY - what a crock of s***. Bush's re-election would be great for al queda. Bush has avoided pursuing al queda so he could do his own thing against Iraq which had no weapons of mass destruction, posed no threat - meanwhile al queda is stronger than ever, active, and 570 some service people died in Iraq and Bush makes jokes about looking under the office furniture for WOMD. Thus a Bush victory is a victory for Bin Laden, the still free Bin Laden. I am sure if Gore had been sworn in, you would be avidly advocating a Gore re-election, right? And your party of course did not run a candidate against FDR in the midst of WW2 because the defea of FDR would have been a victory for Hitler. And of course your party did not run a candidate against Carter in 1980 because the defeat of Carter, who the Ayaltollah called evil, was a victory for the Ayatollah. Oh wait - your party did run someone against Carter, and that person won, and then engaged in illegal arms negotiations with the Ayatolloah in the Iran/Contra affair and meanwhile gave military aid to Saddam and bin laden - both. The Republican track record is one of hypocrasy, fradulent patriotism, and one where they should not be trusted one bit at all with issues of national security. The defeat of George Bush is a victory for America. Pure and simple.

that is embarrasing

I am confused on that myself... who is pitching?

I agree it is state by state I do not agree that most states are 2 years, 3 is more the norm in my experience but it varies by specific cause of action too in Michigan you'd have to go to the legislature home page and search the applicable statutes and that could be a herculean task if anyone can find it it will be you good luck

Sheeee-it, i forgot all about Hart and his warnings - who was the GOP Senator (Rudman?) he was working with on that - they turned out to be very right

you should go - never know who you might meet - but I betcha it wouldn't be Israel4Life

No it is Matt Drudge in his weekend drag

I'll be looking for your posts on what Richard Scarife dropped on the Republicans 1997-2000 because I know you are not one sided partisan.... oh wait...

if you want to get the soxtalk republican vote, you have to tell them it is Jane Fonda and Teresa Heinz making out...

who the hell do you think taught how to play the piano?