KipWellsFan

My point is thought, that the United States would be a better country if a man like Howard Dean was president. Not only for America but for all the other countries of the world as well.

Well if Iraq keeps going at the pace it's going with more troops dying nearly every day and the whole thing about intelligence failures. The CIA, according to the Washington Post, cut the uranium from Africa stuff in October...so they are wondering how it made it into Bush's speech in January. More and more people are getting disgruntled about the Iraq war and how much money it is going to take to deal with that. If people start sifting through Bush's lies and bulls***, he'll be out in 2004 for sure. Kerry is going to run but he voted for the Iraq war. I wonder how he and Lieberman thought being more Republican than the Republicans would get them the Democratic ticket. I don't know why everyone is so surprised that this Iraq war is going the way it is. Did they expect us to go in and have 0 casualties. If you ask me, it's gone very well. When you consider that every solitary US death was analyzed ad nausium, it just seems a lot worse than it really is/was. And until we've been in there a while longer and give us more time to search for the supposed WMD, it's far too early to paint Bush as a liar. Sure, he's a liar because he's a politician, but it's too early to say he lied about all of the things he said about Iraq. Time will tell. And how many democrats voted "yes" to the Iraq war? Just curious. Well here's a page of Bush's lies so it wouldn't completely surprise me if he was lieing about WMD. Frankly I'm pretty sure he is. http://pearly-abraham.tripod.com/htmls/bushlies1.html This is only page 1 of the lies too! I want you to concede right now that if you followed ANY president's every word over the course of 3 years, you'd find just as many "lies". That's probably true, but I'm just trying to illustrate how it is quite fair to think that George W. Bush was lieing about WMD.

Well if Iraq keeps going at the pace it's going with more troops dying nearly every day and the whole thing about intelligence failures. The CIA, according to the Washington Post, cut the uranium from Africa stuff in October...so they are wondering how it made it into Bush's speech in January. More and more people are getting disgruntled about the Iraq war and how much money it is going to take to deal with that. If people start sifting through Bush's lies and bulls***, he'll be out in 2004 for sure. Kerry is going to run but he voted for the Iraq war. I wonder how he and Lieberman thought being more Republican than the Republicans would get them the Democratic ticket. I don't know why everyone is so surprised that this Iraq war is going the way it is. Did they expect us to go in and have 0 casualties. If you ask me, it's gone very well. When you consider that every solitary US death was analyzed ad nausium, it just seems a lot worse than it really is/was. And until we've been in there a while longer and give us more time to search for the supposed WMD, it's far too early to paint Bush as a liar. Sure, he's a liar because he's a politician, but it's too early to say he lied about all of the things he said about Iraq. Time will tell. And how many democrats voted "yes" to the Iraq war? Just curious. Well here's a page of Bush's lies so it wouldn't completely surprise me if he was lieing about WMD. Frankly I'm pretty sure he is. http://pearly-abraham.tripod.com/htmls/bushlies1.html This is only page 1 of the lies too!

Good luck to ya!

LOL, how many times are we going to have to have this argument.

Well what do you think of Dean, sideshow?

Who do you guys think would be the best to represent the Democratic Party? I side with Howard Dean. He seems to have great views. And I truly believe he could make the United States a better country.

this is what pops up when you search for weapons of mass destruction http://www.coxar.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/

Because it's funny...

Go to google.com and type in exactly "weapons of mass destruction", then click I'm feeling lucky.

Major league baseball seems very thin on catchers and if we have a few productive catchers in our system they could become very valuable. I like the idea of drafting lots of catchers. And besides, we really don't have many good catchers in our system.

I'd really like to see Joe Crede break out, he's got a great swing. I think it can be only so long before he goes on a tear.

I love those really baggy uniforms.

Why would the Yankees really want Koch, especially the way he's been pitching this year. Come on people Sell High buy Low

I like throwbacks. But the Chicago ones sure were boring.

:puke

HIYO!!!

Bottom of 9 Gordon in -Phillips singles -Gerut singles off of the wall 1st and 3rd nobody out -Blake Ks swinging -Bradley pops out to short -Spencer KS WP Damaso Marte 4-1 LP Rafael Betancourt 0-1 Sv Tom Gordon (3) Tony G player of the game

HE GAWN!!!!!!!!!

I want to say He Gawn, but this one isn't in the bag yet.

Now Gordon's looking to blow a safe come on.

Leadoff single for Phillips, oh boy.

top of 9 -Ordonez flies out to Gerut -Lee Ks -Harris flies out to left field foul territory Gordon in for the Save

Actually I was looking for a hip check from Olivo.

Good point southsider but it's not like most players swings are ruined after the homerun derby.