Everything posted by greg775
-
GAME THREAD: 4/8, CLE v CHW, 7:10pm CSN+
True, fathom, but Cleveland got a runner on first and didn't hesitate. Immediately bunted the guy to second like ALL managers do in a tie game in extra innings with no outs ... unless the batter is some big horse who simply CANNOT bunt.
-
GAME THREAD: 4/8, CLE v CHW, 7:10pm CSN+
The strategy worked. It's the same strategy we used in the bottom of the ninth. We get a single ... we win the game. We had 2 outs to do it. Players failed. We lose. Case closed. It was not a bad managerial decision. I agree the OTHER call woulda been have Juan steal second, then bunt. Would that have worked? We'll never know. Hit and run with Gordo? Maybe. Would that have worked? We'll never know.
-
GAME THREAD: 4/8, CLE v CHW, 7:10pm CSN+
So can Cleveland. It won them the game.
-
GAME THREAD: 4/8, CLE v CHW, 7:10pm CSN+
Game One was perfection. Two and Three? Wow. Can't win a series at home vs. the Tribe.
-
GAME THREAD: 4/8, CLE v CHW, 7:10pm CSN+
LOL at how shallow they play Pierre. Wow.
-
GAME THREAD: 4/8, CLE v CHW, 7:10pm CSN+
Well, the bunt worked perfectly for Cleveland cause they have some professional hitters who CAME THROUGH in the clutch. Put the blame where it lies: Paulie and Jones couldn't get a f***ing bloop hit to win it.
-
GAME THREAD: 4/8, CLE v CHW, 7:10pm CSN+
To me, it was the exact same situation. Gordon Beckham isn't Mickey Mantle (yet) and Juan Pierre isn't Rickey Henderson.
-
GAME THREAD: 4/8, CLE v CHW, 7:10pm CSN+
Somebody said Manny Acta wouldn't bunt. The exact f***ing same thing. All managers bunt in that situation. Believe it.
-
GAME THREAD: 4/8, CLE v CHW, 7:10pm CSN+
It might have been a silly call, but what manager would not have bunted there? I guess maybe somebody would have sent Juan on the first pitch, then bunted if he was successful on the first pitch steal.
-
GAME THREAD: 4/8, CLE v CHW, 7:10pm CSN+
He may not be a finesse hitter, but is he capable of drilling a game winning single?
-
GAME THREAD: 4/8, CLE v CHW, 7:10pm CSN+
Glad Randy got the first batter.
-
GAME THREAD: 4/8, CLE v CHW, 7:10pm CSN+
Jones could have picked everybody up and been a hero with a single there. What's with the fly ball? Didn't he used to play in the NL?
-
GAME THREAD: 4/8, CLE v CHW, 7:10pm CSN+
It didn't work, so it's the wrong move. I still think it's on the players more than Oz but since it didn't work, Oz gets an F for the move.
-
GAME THREAD: 4/8, CLE v CHW, 7:10pm CSN+
Those are hittable pitches, Mr. Jones.
-
GAME THREAD: 4/8, CLE v CHW, 7:10pm CSN+
I'm surprised you guys don't realize it's up to our players. Man on second, one out ain't bad odds. A good team gets the single and wins it.
-
GAME THREAD: 4/8, CLE v CHW, 7:10pm CSN+
We're still one hit from a victory. A GOOD team wraps it up here, even in game three of the season.
-
GAME THREAD: 4/8, CLE v CHW, 7:10pm CSN+
We are still one single from a victory with 2 outs to go. It's a good call especially at home against CLEVELAND. I can agree a stolen base mighta also been in order.
-
GAME THREAD: 4/8, CLE v CHW, 7:10pm CSN+
I think almost every manager in baseball would bunt there. It's the bottom of the ninth. We need one run. It may not work but we're one f***ing single from a victory right now.
-
GAME THREAD: 4/8, CLE v CHW, 7:10pm CSN+
Calm down and tell me why a bunt is so bad there. We need one f***ing run. Get serious people. It's a decent call.
-
GAME THREAD: 4/8, CLE v CHW, 7:10pm CSN+
Well, this works so far. Nice job Juan and Gordo.
-
GAME THREAD: 4/8, CLE v CHW, 7:10pm CSN+
A stud leadoff man gets on base here.
-
GAME THREAD: 4/8, CLE v CHW, 7:10pm CSN+
Credit where it's deserved: Nice job Bobby. I missed the Konerko play so my bad on the Thornton criticism.
-
GAME THREAD: 4/8, CLE v CHW, 7:10pm CSN+
I didn't see it all, but that shot to the gap wasn't all on the defense. Cmon Bobby!
-
GAME THREAD: 4/8, CLE v CHW, 7:10pm CSN+
Did AJ not see it? What happened? He's usually not terrible.
-
GAME THREAD: 4/8, CLE v CHW, 7:10pm CSN+
I love Thornton, but Cleveland scored off him. And now Bobby may be imploding. Sucko.