LDF

http://www.sportsline.com/mlb/teams/preview/CHW an interesting read and one that i agree with.

If that's the case, don't leave out Todd Ritchie. i was going with attitude. ritchie was still a nice guy considering his play last yr.

you are right, i remember we address this before about the word was that he was a clubhouse cancer. i hope that is wrong, b/c we really don't need another clayton

navarro, belle, royce clayton = tie. i am going with the worst regardless if sign as fa or what ever.

He left the boards by his own decision? That's a switch from the past. While Bmr was humorous at times, he was nothing but an instigator. Yup, and i admitted that myself. So whats your point? I f***ed with daver and voodoo because theyre losers and i wont let a loser, or anyone control what i say or do. No i did not leave by my decision, but basically forced them to ban me the first time. The second time? I got banned for basically nothing. Oh well lol. I would like to add that as long as noone tries to control me, I am the nicest person you will ever meet. The person any of you saw over at WSI was not the real me. I was having fun f***ing with those losers. As far as this site goes, as long as noone tries to control what i say, they wont ever have a problem with me. If you check the Hitler thread, youll see voodoo attacking over and over and over, with minimal concern by me. look into my eyes, you are feeling sleepy, you will repeat after me, i am not in control......

what????? do ya think that she doesn't like to see the truth according to me?

well said Thank you. I didn't want to bash anybody. If fact, I occasionally "lurk" over there as a non-member. ever since they took the ability of not been seen, i been lurking as well. when i see something that i want to respond to, then i log in. i still like the site but not as much as this one. i guess ever since the blow up, i can't give them any loyality as i do here. however, some of the excuses that are being use is not valid. ok some of us bashed the mod, not the site and only sometimes. its not like we do it on a daily basis. except for this thread. well wsi will never have the services of knowing anything first hand ever again...........espically if you get bashed for knowing something they dont........i say :fyou them...............arrogant bastards......... tsk tsk, this love affair you have for daver and his spurning you must really hurt.

I don't suppose the video dealt with the corruption and tyranny of Saddam Hussein though, did it? I wonder what it's like living in the world with such a warped view? Sure, Bush has his skeletons..... ALL politicians do. But, as I stated in previous threads, this War is more anti-Bush than it is anti-War..... at least in most of the anti-War protestors minds. system is a band i really like. in their vid, one thing that they brought up was the oil contract that went to halibuton(sp) even before the US started the war. however as i said, i am still for this war, b/c i think we needed to get him out. i just thought this vid was interesting.

What's that old saying? You reap what you sew. to put it mildly, yeah. however, if this war was not to make any profits then why should we not let france companies help in the reconstruction?

true, but i think why we post these things is to see where some of the sports writers are coming from. most importantly to keep the discussion of the sox fresh and a way to vent our anger at these writers.

Apu more than holds his own. I guess I can cease posting since evidently my poists have been unread. I thought I held my own too but I guess not, evidently not even been read. So - see ya. did you mean just posting in general or on this subject concerning the war.

well said Thank you. I didn't want to bash anybody. If fact, I occasionally "lurk" over there as a non-member. ever since they took the ability of not been seen, i been lurking as well. when i see something that i want to respond to, then i log in. i still like the site but not as much as this one. i guess ever since the blow up, i can't give them any loyality as i do here. however, some of the excuses that are being use is not valid. ok some of us bashed the mod, not the site and only sometimes. its not like we do it on a daily basis. except for this thread.

it wasn't indirect but in reallity a correct reasoning of what you wrote.

their new vid, Bomb, is really nice. the message is good and some of the info they added has me thinking on some of the corruption of bush. however i am still for this war. see the vid not which is different than the mp3 song.

al central they have twins first with our sox second. here is what is said about us White Sox Short Take: Bartolo Colon could put this offensive-minded club over the top. Breakout Player: The White Sox put on a clinic last year in how not to handle a prized pitching prospect returning from shoulder surgery. They let Jon Rauch make the big league club, then didn’t use him for two weeks. When he struggled afterward, they seemed surprised. Now that Rauch has recovered, he’s ready to contribute

If you can lower yourself to the level of a slithering snake or a blood-thirsty shark then, by all means, become a lawyer or a politcian

we don't need them, let them sulked.

these is no code of conduct but if you want people to listen to you, dont go off and attack them take in what they say. and use it against them. that is how you get your msg across. you show them there flaws in there opionions. not by cussing them out or insulting them that just gets you into a shouting match with noone wins. you are missing the point son. go and smoke another joint.

can we have a code of conduct post here. i like to know how far i can tell bmr to screw him self, hsc to get laid and etc....

Well, CK, Saddam wouldn't be armed with weapons if we hadn't sold them all to him in the first place, now would he? Who is to say that 1) the plant has made chem weapons, 2) that Blix and Co. (if given adequate time and not pressured by the West Texas moron) would have found more weapons (I personally believe they could have if given time...if there are weapons there) etc. The Bush regime case for war was inadequate and they sent people off to die anyway. Sickening...absolutely sickening. you keep bringing this up that the USA was the one to arm saddam like its a defense for your position that we shouldnt go to war ...but since we did arm the stupid bastard isnt that even more of a reason for us to disarm him??? excellent counter.

The aid is mostly weapons and military tech. I'm just saying that we should shut off the $ faucet to Colombia too if we are serious about stopping human rights violations and we should go in and overthrow every government that is harming people (what about the US and their abuses to prisoners that have been found to be innocent? isn't that harming people) alright you are finally seeing it from my side

Thanks for the insult, 420. I know I must be doing something right when all you have is insults for your arguments. It seems by assuming war is the only answer, you're the one that claims to know all. March 7: Hans Blix quoted as saying that they were finding stuff and they were fine. But Bush wasn't content with that. He needed to bomb the s*** out stuff. The UN inspectors should have been given more time. It's that simple. Or how about the Bush regime telling the truth and not using plagiarized info from 12 years ago? There were various resolutions floating around the UN that were non-military and a vast majority of them called for the inspectors to be given adequate time. How's that for a reason? and how many do you think suddan would have agreed to. Do you deny that suddan hasnt been playing the UN/US for years playing games of hide and seak with his weapons that he should have never had. and to say that the UN would have found all his weapons is just niave its a huge country and we found a huge building used to produce chemical weapons that the un has never seen and had been there for years. The UN was walked though Iraq by suddan himself, those inspectors didnt go anywhere he didnt want them to. war isnt the anwer you say but you yourslef has stated he is a mad man. So why are you against use removing him???? you go 420

i am sure about whom you were saying this too, but i am 39 yrs ols, was a history major when i was in college many many yrs ago and and somewhat informed.

My brain has gone blank who is Pedro Lopez and who is Stewart? Lopez is an infield prospect, very young if I recall. Not sure which Stewart your referring too, Josh? If its Josh he's the starter, but I'm assuming thats not who your talking about, lol. who is lopez.

as long as the person who erase all the stuff in the beginning is kept away from the buttons