Everything posted by Chisoxfn
-
Official 2009-2010 NFL Thread
Huh...a tight end, what the f***.
-
Official 2009-2010 NFL Thread
5-11 and a forty in the 4.6 range. I assume Browns will take Beanie Wells at 21.
-
Official 2009-2010 NFL Thread
Browns have a ton of ammo to move up in the 4th and 5th rounds which could be really beneficialy, imo. I agree with you Murcie, however, I also think Nicks might be the best player in the draft. He plays so physical and I would love for the Bears to have a guy like him. I'm assuming Eagles moved up because they were concerned other teams were calling to move up to nab Maclin. I figured they would take Wells, but I'm now going to assume the Lions take Oher right here. I assume they don't go Wells, unless they aren't sold on Smith.
-
Official 2009-2010 NFL Thread
Reports on the score indicate that the Bears want Derrick Williams @ 49.
-
Official 2009-2010 NFL Thread
QUOTE (danman31 @ Apr 25, 2009 -> 02:38 PM) Great f***ing pick Philly. I'm now an Eagles fan. Whoop ass Jeremy! What about your Falcons.
-
Official 2009-2010 NFL Thread
Wow, Maclin is pretty similar to Desean Jackson so they are going with a smaller WR corps that is fast as f***.
-
Official 2009-2010 NFL Thread
I wish I had tv for this draft. Hopefully I'll have DirectTV soon enough. Browns move down again. I assume they are going to have quite a few more cuts. Whose Philly take? I'm surprised Maclin is falling this far, the guy is a f***in stud.
-
Official 2009-2010 NFL Thread
A 6th round pick isn't a ton to give up. I assume Denver was going to take Freeman or at least thought they were. A 6th rounder isn't a lot for Cleveland but its something and isn't bad as long as the guy they target doesn't go off the board in the next 2 picks.
-
Official 2009-2010 NFL Thread
What did the Browns get here?
-
Official 2009-2010 NFL Thread
QUOTE (fathom @ Apr 25, 2009 -> 02:13 PM) Gotcha...couldn't get a good look at her. I can see why, she has an appearance from far away that she's cute and than when you see her up close she's just really unique and oddly shaped. Not horrible or anything but I'll take my girl over his and I don't have millions, haha. BUt I do have Soxtalk, lol
-
Official 2009-2010 NFL Thread
His girlfriend isn't attractive. Me and my girlfriend saw them and my girlfriends first comment was on how odd she looked and I concurred.
-
Official 2009-2010 NFL Thread
You know what I want now, Freeman to Denver. I'd laugh hysterically.
-
Official 2009-2010 NFL Thread
I love it, Washington didn't dick around. They strolled right out there and made the pick. Great pick for the SKins, imo. HOw long were the Skins even on the clock?
-
Minor League Catch-All thread 2009 edition
Rodriguez has one of the best pen arms in the system.
-
Official 2009-2010 NFL Thread
I highly doubt Hester is dealt, unless they get a 1st rounder and even than I question how the Bears will benefit from the move unless they want to save money. Hester can make it as a WR or at least has a better shot than most of the WR's available. Now if there is a defensive player or something else they really love than I'd be okay .
-
Official 2009-2010 NFL Thread
QUOTE (MurcieOne @ Apr 25, 2009 -> 01:26 PM) the bears would lose his bloated salary too... i don't know how much money was given to him as a signing bonus, but if they could get rid of guaranteed money, and give it to Boldin -- it might make sense. Still... we'd still only have 1 receiver I dunno, and trading Hester seems odd to me for some reason. It is tough to do that in the NFL though. I'd liek the deal a lot more if you could just clear a ton of salary like it works in baseball, but I don't think you'd get much benefit for moving Hester financially speaking. Could be wrong though.
-
Official 2009-2010 NFL Thread
QUOTE (EvilJester99 @ Apr 25, 2009 -> 01:23 PM) If the Bears can get Boldin for a second and Hester... they better do it like RIGHT NOW!! I think its too much to give up. If you get a 3rd back in the deal than I'd consider it, but Boldin has too many health risks to me. Plus wouldn't there be some serious cap implications with the trade or would it be easy to actually move Hesters contract (I assume he got a big signing bonus though and all of that would hit the cap this year which I guess the Bears could afford but they'd also have a lot of guaranteed money going to Boldin for his new contract as well as the money probably going to CUtler if he does a good job this year). Oh I would trade Hester for a more proven WR, but than again, I'd rather have Braylon than Boldin. Braylon has had less production but overall I like him more for some reason, mainly because I think the price is less.
-
Official 2009-2010 NFL Thread
Crabtree goes right here. Damn, talk about upgrading your WR corps. From Matt Jones/Jerry Porter/Reggie Willams to Crabtree/Holt. I'm shocked the Raiders do this though. They love speed.
-
Official 2009-2010 NFL Thread
QUOTE (fathom @ Apr 25, 2009 -> 01:21 PM) Where you see this? http://www.nbcchicago.com/sports/football/...-the-Block.html
-
Official 2009-2010 NFL Thread
Ya, I think thats exactly it. BUt I got to give the Jets credit. Good move.
-
Official 2009-2010 NFL Thread
Wow, Jets didn't give up much. Just a 2nd rounder. Thats a steal.
-
Official 2009-2010 NFL Thread
Some rumors swirling that Hester is on the block. Quite interesting.
-
Official 2009-2010 NFL Thread
QUOTE (Soxbadger @ Apr 25, 2009 -> 07:59 AM) http://www.draftcountdown.com/sub/Mock-Draft-A.php Bears getting Nicks in the second, thats what ive been wanting forever. Nicks is built like Boldin and from what ive seen Nicks is going to be a good NFL player. Nicks is the guy I want too. He's strong, physical and will go out and get the football. I think he has a chance to be one of those guys that isn't amazingly quick but finds ways to make plays. Much like TO and Boldin do. I don't know if he can or will but thats who I want. I'll get excited over almost any WR, but Nicks is the guy that excites me the most and otherwise I have no problem moving down and taking Mike Wallace later on purely because of his measurables.
-
Official 2009-2010 NFL Thread
QUOTE (T R U @ Apr 24, 2009 -> 01:49 PM) Except its on a Saturday, so it doesn't need to be in prime time as most people will be able to watch whenever. Add in the fact that starting it at noon still takes it into primetime anyways. Plus if they did that, they'd want to start the 1st round in prime time and than just do all the remaining rounds on day 2. That would be the smart way to do it cause everyone tunes in for the first few picks but a lot of people zone in and out after that.
-
Official 2009-2010 NFL Thread
I don't like the idea of giving up another pick and I do think Boldin has a lot of injury concerns, but I wouldn't be opposed to giving up a 2nd round pick for Boldin.