kapkomet

QUOTE(iamshack @ Jul 8, 2007 -> 06:11 AM) He will be signed. You're a f***ing fool. Note: Was that sarcasm?

QUOTE(southsider2k5 @ Jul 8, 2007 -> 03:14 AM) So are you honestly telling me the next Democratic President will not have his her backers talking about how bad the Bush administration was? Not a chance. They'll throw that out there every chance they get. Fixed that for you.

QUOTE(sox4lifeinPA @ Jul 7, 2007 -> 08:32 PM) what the crap.... you come to PA and don't call? You stupid dork ass... it only took you two weeks to figure it out.

One more note, thanks for the understanding on this. I think that now's the best time to (re)launch, and I don't think we will have the issues that we had again. Let's get this thing going again!

QUOTE(Mplssoxfan @ Jul 6, 2007 -> 01:56 PM) Kap, make sure you head for high ground. This is ridiculous! It has been absolutely crazy here. My yard is a lake and a jungle at the same time.

QUOTE(Rex Kicka** @ Jul 6, 2007 -> 04:24 PM) Honestly, for all the whining liberals do about the Bush administration - at least its a current administration. The amount of time Bill Clinton's presidency still comes up around here, you'd think he'd still be schtupping Monica in the Oval Office right now. You're wrong. I could care less about Monica and Bill. But for all the darts that you all want to throw, just 6-7 years ago, it was all fine. That's the only reason it gets brought up, well that and Hillary wants to be president again.

Nice. Now if I could just get that monkey off the site...

QUOTE(southsider2k5 @ Jul 5, 2007 -> 11:00 PM) Quick fact, a Prius at 100 mph gets about 20 miles to the gallon. My Impala at 80 got about 32 , yeah me the enviormentalist! Now that's priceless.

OK, so wait... We have these blowhards like Rush, Hannity, et. al... who discuss "right wing" values. Of course, two things come to mind right away. First, it's entertainment, if that's what floats your boat. Second, "liberals" (sorry, but I have to differentiate) could get whatever time they wanted (you say 3AM in your example), but what if they sold? If they sold, they would be on during the days in place of the right wingers, right? So why is this a big deal? In my mind, it's because the "right wingers" dominate, because they have found a message that resounds to more people then the "liberals". By the way, I do say "right wingers" as opposed to "conservatives", because they are WAY different people.

QUOTE(Rex Kicka** @ Jul 5, 2007 -> 07:54 PM) The Fairness Doctrine and the Equal Time Doctrine are two completely different things. How so? Edumacate me.

QUOTE(Soxy @ Jul 5, 2007 -> 02:08 PM) Kap, even if you make make valid points cloaked in the rhetoric you use, no one will take you seriously or try to have an intelligent thought out debate with you. Do both sides do it? Yep. But if you take the tactics that you're always complaining about and calling horrible--why should anyone take you seriously? You're smarter than the rhetoric you use in here. Well, most of the time, I'm providing the "anti-hyperbole" of the same things I see in the press from Chuck Schumer, Hillary Clinton, et. al. You know my favorite Democrat? Dennis Kusenich (sp.) - you know why? Because this guy is a straight shooter, and he has NEVER waivered from those views. I can at least respect that. To your main point above, yes I understand what you're getting at.

I got a Nikon D40. It's light years ahead of the Kodaks. I can see why everyone raves about the Digital SLR's now. The pictures just when we were messing around with it out of the box last nigh are amazing when compared to the Kodaks we have. No, it's not the top of the line in the market place right now, but this is a damn good camera.

QUOTE(Soxy @ Jul 4, 2007 -> 07:13 PM) Nope. Why make a reasoned argument when you can just scream hyberboles at people who disagree? You know what? If you took the time to read beyond some of the "hyperbole", there actually is some substance behind what I'm saying in this case. Since it's defending anyone with an ® behind their name, it's always "hyperbole". Yes, the first sentance most of the time is that, because most of the time, the hypocracy offered by the left screams the same hyperbole that I'm throwing out. Mplssoxfan, yes... Berger did destroy the same evidence that would have convicted him. It's kind of hard to prosecute that, but then again, since he's a Democratic Angel protecting his former bosses, it's all ok. Since Berger destroyed the only thing that could convict him, he got a slap on the wrist based on circumstance. As far as the "Paris Hilton" thing, hah. That's funny. Then you all keep going back to the "as governor of Texas" stuff... please. It's a lot different. I would argue that Bush is now claiming executive priviledge on things that he shouldn't be, only because it's going to end up in the same s*** that "caught" Scooter Libby. They are LOOKING for a perjury trap on anyone they can get it on with this administration in any way, shape or form. Beyond that, it's funny how you all simply keep ignoring the fact that he wasn't even the leaker in the case, and he wasn't ever convicted of that. That's what you all wanted. He got convicted on the same thing Bill Clinton should have, and would have, in a court. However, because it was Congress in an impeachment setting, of course he didn't get "convicted". Truthfully, that whole thing was crap - and this whole thing is crap. He perjured himself on something that wasn't even about what he was brought in for questioning about, much like Clinton. That's the only reason I bring it up. Did Libby break the law? Absolutely. Should he get punished? Yep. The only reason that you all are upset is because as I said in another post is you want undeniable blood on the current administration, and you didn't get it. Now, you all think he's simply covering everything up - what is there to cover up? *Yawn* Bush lied, people died. *Yawn* Am I making light of people's sacrifice? Nope. But with what was on the table at the time, he went with it, and I don't think for a minute it was fabricated. But that's just too simple for everyone who hates this man's guts anyway.

QUOTE(Balance @ Jul 4, 2007 -> 04:07 PM) Kap- I am extremely disappointed in you, and in the rest of the Fox News junkies who somehow find themselves capable of thinking the way you do. That's the only polite thing I can say. LMAO. I have only watched Fox News about 30 minutes in my lifetime. I'm not kidding. I never watch it. Contrary to some people's opinion, it is possible to not believe every single talking point the New York Times (and therefore by extention, AP, Reuters, etc), ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, and NPR spot out. I personally think that O'Rielly is a tool. But I'm just fodder for the "neo-con right wingists". But you know, everything BushCo is evil, and everything the Dems do is s*** rose smelled poop, so I guess it doesn't matter in the scheme of things, now does it?

QUOTE(Rex Kicka** @ Jul 3, 2007 -> 10:46 PM) Could you tell me exactly where in a court of law Bill Clinton was convicted of perjury and had his sentence commuted? If he could have been tried in a COURT OF LAW, he would have been convicted. But since it was a political process and turned into an impeachment trial, of course he wasn't "convicted", but he later admitted lying under oath, which is a felony. But of course, that depends on your definition of what "is" is. Whatever... let's not rehash this crap again. I've said it before, I'll say it again. Scooter's problem was he was too honest. All he had to do was say he didn't remember the details. What he went to testify about was eventually proven false (that he was the leaker). So, he got nailed on something else unrelated that was inconsistent in his testimony. But again, whatever. You all smell blood, you want blood, so have at it.

QUOTE(CanOfCorn @ Jul 3, 2007 -> 09:15 PM) *shakes kap* "Kaaaaa-aaaaap...Kaaaaaa-aaaaaaap.......it's not over yet. Go back to sleep." So how are you faring down there in Austin with all the rain? We have our Noah the Ark built in back of our house.

QUOTE(Soxfest @ Jul 3, 2007 -> 09:10 PM) I agree................JR still acting like a small market team If he has such a problem it really is time for him to sell. Proof, if you agree?

*Yawn* Wake me up when this is over.

Cool, thanks for that. I need to set up a "server hotline" IM...

I am in the process of trying to figure out the IM thing. It looks like you're right on that, Rex, and that sucks. But I'll know after I can check it out in a couple of days.

QUOTE(fathom @ Jul 3, 2007 -> 08:24 PM) There's just no reason for him to even comment on that. It was a great site last night seeing people support Buehrle like they did. Buehrle would probably be the first person to admit that he deserved to get that treatment from the fans during the 2nd half of last year. The funny thing is I really don't remember Buehrle getting booed that much last year. Well I wasn't THERE to see it, but I certainly saw enough on this very site to make me sick from most of you so-called "fans" (no, not YOU, fathom, but a hell of a lot of you that read this stuff). I also remember a game or two on TV that you could hear the boobirds clear as day, and in fact, I seem to remember a lot of people relishing (on this site, again) about booing the players. Should Ozzie have said it? Meh, I'm indifferent, but it's spot on. How soon we all forget things, good and bad.

QUOTE(fathom @ Jul 3, 2007 -> 08:06 PM) Ozzie's comments about how the same people cheering for Buehrle were the ones booing him last year were pathetic. Oh come on... you don't have to go any further then this site to know that Ozzie was RIGHT ON with that comment, and this is supposed to be the hard core fan's site (or sites). It's absolutely a spot on quote.

QUOTE(The Ginger Kid @ Jul 3, 2007 -> 07:42 PM) It's a shame any American would not be outraged over this, or the fact that Libby's actions were tied to revealing the identity of a CIA agent, all part of an orchestrated effort to mislead the American public into war. *yawn*

Actually, at the heart of it all, I agree with you all as well. However, it is EXPRESSLY in the Constitution, so there are reasons that this was put in. I'll see if I can come up with some research to see why, because now I'm curious.

QUOTE(StrangeSox @ Jul 3, 2007 -> 05:13 PM) Kinda like how Republicans keep b****ing about Clinton's BJ and pardons for the last 6-8 years? It's not brought up much at all until this happened... because again, at the heart of it all, the hypocracy is quite enormous here. Now, if you want to talk about someone who lied under oath... now that is a story no one wants to even remotely touch... because it was about "private" stuff. /rollseyes I just saw your edit... now I do agree with that.