Jake

Off the post, f***

QUOTE (mr_genius @ Jun 19, 2013 -> 09:27 PM) OMG WHO WAS THE GUY THAT MISSED THAT SWEET CENTER FEED Bickell, I think

Keep chanting Crawford, guys. Who gave up your four goals, I wonder?

Very deflating

Tie game. We look horrible and rattled

QUOTE (RockRaines @ Jun 19, 2013 -> 09:19 PM) The interference on Crawford was ridiculous. marshand just slashes his stick out of his hands while standing in the crease. "Crawford lost his stick on the play" How? Did it just evaporate?

Irritates me that the NHL is so worried about its image that they won't comment on any of these soft calls/no calls

Jesus Christ were we trying to puke this lead away there

What a flukey goal

Suck it Boston!

QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Jun 19, 2013 -> 08:11 PM) They were in great shape until the two Saad blow ups, then they fell apart. Saad giveth, Saad taketh away

Awful first period. Lucky to be in a tie game, though it could have looked much different had the officials dinged McQuaid for roughing as he punched the s*** out of Stalberg

Terrible officiating and a terrible turnover leads to goal

WHAT THE f***? MCQUAID WAS THROWING f***ING PUNCHES

BOOYAH

My god that interference call

ADA leads off with a bomb.

QUOTE (Eminor3rd @ Jun 19, 2013 -> 04:52 PM) I like the idea of Olt. I think he has been substantially overrated and I think the Rangers know that, so I think he might actually be attainable. A ton of his value comes from his solid defense at third, which would be great for us but is useless to the Rangers as long as Beltre is around. The bat doesn't play at first. Why are you convinced his bat doesn't play at first? He had a 1.000 OPS in AA last season. He certainly isn't likely to do that in the big leagues, but if you get him you're hoping he looks like the guy that was on a 50 HR pace last year.

QUOTE (Soxbadger @ Jun 19, 2013 -> 04:38 PM) What Sony posted should be the same for Xbox. Both companies are always subject to the licensing agreement of the developer. Thus EA can make someone pay $5 for Madden Online if they really want to and Xbox/Sony arent going to get involved. Or EA can make a game that wont work if its not online, and Sony/Xbox wont get involved. Why would they? Its your call whether to buy an EA game, and if people hate this so much, it would probably behoove EA not to put any silly restrictions on it. But yeah, at least Xbox was able to see the terrible train wreck and avoid it. Which is good for us all because now Sony will have to still compete with xbox and Ill get my Ps4 cheaper. The real question is how many people got the old info and never end up getting the revised info? It's always hard to change a story that gets spread around, ask every politician ever.

QUOTE (fathom @ Jun 19, 2013 -> 04:38 PM) In case Peralta gets a 50 game suspension I'm surprised no one has suggested Matt Adams, 1B from the Cardinals That's been discussed, at least by me. That would be the type of player I'd advocate trying to get.

QUOTE (IlliniKrush @ Jun 19, 2013 -> 04:03 PM) Tonight's game doesn't know what happened the past 2 games. Irrelevant. So can I see the Hawks losing one game tonight? Of course. Yep. First rule of statistics Or second. One of the rules!!

Dunn in June - 21.4% K rate. Season - 31.7%, lowest pace as a White Sox

I'd like to see PS4 answer back by re-re-clarifying their DRM policy, because if what is posted is true they become more restrictive. At least they would still let me stream movies, White Sox for free and it costs a hundred less up front.

QUOTE (Steve9347 @ Jun 19, 2013 -> 02:01 PM) So we head back to what was dominating the LA Kings and should have never changed. In the shootaround. Bickell - Toews - Kane Sharp - Handzus - Mayers Hossa Saad - Shaw - Stalberg Kruger - Bolland - Frolik Those top 3 lines are just ridiculous. This is perfect, pretty much how I would have lined them up. To me, Bickell isn't a real first-liner but pairs up with those two really well.

QUOTE (Chicago White Sox @ Jun 19, 2013 -> 01:08 PM) I said his ceiling was a "solid leadoff hitter" which is exactly what you described. I never called him a "franchise changing" anything. I'm not exactly sure what we're arguing here. Sounds like we're debating what "high" means