Jake

The truth is that teams have no issues taking on contracts in the offseason when they have a clean slate, but they never like to take on money in mid-season deals

Mark Gonzales ‏@MDGonzales 1m Rios in clubhouse, no lineup posted

Approach at the plate is supposedly the main issue with Avisail. I think this is one of the things Manto is best at teaching.

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Jul 31, 2013 -> 02:33 PM) We can shed his money by doing a waiver wire trade or just putting him on waivers if it's that important. Which it is not

Doug Padilla ‏@ESPNChiSox 2m White Sox pitchers gathering in the OF to work out. The entire gang appears to be there.

The truth is that Peavy would be making much more if he was a free agent right now

We have yet to post a lineup http://www.baseballpress.com/lineup.php

QUOTE (Buehrle>Wood @ Jul 31, 2013 -> 02:22 PM) We will find out in 40 minutes but always felt that was the plan. It is nice that we are swimming in money and our rotation will cost less than 20 million next year. I'm guessing we add a bunch of midlevel free agents. Sounds like 2005 Good, young rotation with an underperforming offense

QUOTE (chunk23 @ Jul 31, 2013 -> 02:19 PM) They pay him to play for another team so they can get good prospects so they can rebuild. Right now they're just dumping salary and will be fielding an even worse team next year. You're assuming we could get good prospects for Rios -- so far, the evidence suggests that we could not.

As much as I'd like to see Avisail up here, I'm not giving up Rios for nothing. Avisail could use some refinement as it is. He's hardly played a season's worth of games above A-ball

QUOTE (iamshack @ Jul 31, 2013 -> 02:15 PM) What does that term mean, btw? Just filler? Yeah typically these are players that aren't expected be major leaguers, and if so don't have ceilings much higher than bench players

What we don't know is what exactly eating money gets us. If we eat money just to get a s***ty return, then no, I wouldn't eat any money

JIM BOWDEN ‏@JimBowdenESPNxm 15s Angels had no interest in a Trumbo deal with Pittsburgh...NO INTEREST lol NO INTEREST

I can sense it...people are going to start believing they know what all the offers were

QUOTE (fathom @ Jul 31, 2013 -> 02:03 PM) Sounds like they're trying to talk Cruz into appealing Even if he stays, their offense hasn't been good enough

It will shock me if Rangers don't do anything.

Come on stealth Hahn!

QUOTE (Rowand44 @ Jul 31, 2013 -> 12:19 PM) Gillaspie shouldn't be starting on this team after this year. He's not very good. Of course he should be on the team. And, for now, he should be the starting 3B. The emergence of just about anyone as a 3B prospect would certainly relegate him to a bench role. There's no reason for him to not be on the team.

If Dunn went to Texas, he'd be beloved and their GM would be hailed as brilliant. He'd continue to knock in runs for a team that really needs it and they wouldn't have to give up anybody that the fans are familiar with to get him

Baseball America made the perfect comparison for Iglesias - Rey Ordonez. Rey was a f***ing amazing fielder, but just an abysmal hitter with no silver lining at the plate. While he has some of the best UZR numbers I've ever seen, he only exceeded 1.1 WAR once in his career.

No one considers it a bad one, but in mid-season there aren't many clubs that have budgeted for it.

I would feel that way if bucket hadn't made it seem like a deal was, in fact, likely Could be misreading that enigma though

I would feel that way if bucket hadn't made it seem like a deal was, in fact, likely Could be misreading that enigma though

Make a FutureSox.com banner and put it up there

QUOTE (fathom @ Jul 31, 2013 -> 10:05 AM) If you trade Alexei today, it wouldn't hurt to give Beckham a tryout at SS the rest of the way. I still would be interested in bringing Semien up. Can't argue with having Beckham slide over, though. Wouldn't mind seeing Sanchez up, but it would be like Jose Iglesias in that you know he's not going to hit