Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Soxtalk.com

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Jake

Members

Everything posted by Jake

  1. Because everyone knows that Veal has a much better chance getting a lefty out, regardless of what 13 innings of splits say. Jesus, have some common sense
  2. QUOTE (GreenSox @ Jul 30, 2013 -> 08:41 PM) The "haul" from the Angels will be B and C prospects. That's what Kennedy is worth. Also note that Angels farm is not strong. The haul from Arizona will be reduced by the value they lost because they lost Kennedy. Maybe they send us only 1 top prospect and the rest of the return will be from the Angels, but I'll believe it when I see it, because the net result of this is that we are paying no money, which also would mean lesser prospects. I don't think the Kennedy trade affects the total value going to us other than it enables the trade to happen in the first place. I do assume that these lesser prospect(s) from Angels will go to us though
  3. Phil Rogers ‏@ChiTribRogers 2m Reports of 3-tm White Sox-AZ-LAA trade are intriguing. Diamondbacks' Adam Eaton, Angels' Peter Bourjos among good targets for Rick Hahn. If the D'Backs/Sox could turn Ian Kennedy into Peter Bourjos, that would be highway robbery
  4. Semien 3-3, 2B, HR unreal
  5. QUOTE (GreenSox @ Jul 30, 2013 -> 08:28 PM) But he won't bring the value of prospects we want. And then Arizona is unlikely to send us the prospects we want, because their cost is reduced by the value of Kennedy. So this three way trade sounds like we'll get mediocre prospects from the Angels and Arizona. I'm not following your logic at all. 1. Moving Kennedy frees up the money to get Peavy 2. We weren't going to allow Kennedy to make up any part of the deal except a throw-in. 3. They knew he had value that is higher than zero. 4. They bring in Angels who will give them this greater than zero value. 5. Since it is a three-way trade, they are apparently going to send all or part of the haul from the Angels to us 6. We also get what we wanted in the first place (Owings, Davidson, Holmberg, whomever)
  6. Bowden also later added that Cards were unwilling to consider CMart or Wacha
  7. Beat writers and I think that was the top of his foot
  8. That could easily be a broken foot.
  9. Rios with apparent foot injury
  10. Jake replied to flavum's topic in FutureSox Board
    No reason to freak out about Anderson. He's been fine. Sample was small. He was batting .320 a week ago
  11. QUOTE (fathom @ Jul 30, 2013 -> 08:14 PM) Nope Though I'd easily be joining the Rick Hahn fan club if it were
  12. I like him! You can see where he can be rough around the edges, but you can also see why he's been so dominant lately. Looks like a MLB starter to me.
  13. Dayan's conventional (AVG/OBP/SLG) and advanced (wRC+/UZR/UBR/WAR) almost a mirror of last year now.
  14. QUOTE (Wanne @ Jul 30, 2013 -> 07:56 PM) that's not the point...it's a plus add-in. why do you think they're trying to move him...peavy's spot + money. Watching him pitch right now saying "i'd take him...." I think what we're seeing is that Kennedy can turn into some caliber of prospect(s) for the D'Backs so they don't want to just throw him into a deal for us when they can get actual value for him from someone else. In this case, they're going to turn that value into something we want (prospects)
  15. Davidson has demonstrated a far more impressive capacity for plate discipline
  16. QUOTE (Wanne @ Jul 30, 2013 -> 07:53 PM) Honestly don't know why they wouldn't just include Kennedy in the Peavy deal and toss back Lindy... We probably don't want Kennedy at the expense of prospects
  17. Thatta boy Tank! Been looking so good there.
  18. Owings or Davidson PLUS Holmberg would be fine. Throw in another decent prospect and call it a deal.
  19. They spent several minutes talking about how a throw to second would have allowed Bourn to score. The entire defense set up to have throw cut to home because Bourn could have given it a go.
  20. QUOTE (caulfield12 @ Jul 30, 2013 -> 07:35 PM) Another runner advancing to 2nd base that shouldn't have been there due to Viciedo. Jesus, he needs to be either a 1B/DH or traded to another organization. That's two bad plays in consecutive games when he was called out for the exact same thing by Ventura in the game story last night. Just no excuse for that. He might love to show off his arm in left, but he's so often been irresponsible with his lack of fundamental play (not that we haven't seen it from Rios and DeAza, either, it's endemic). They were calling for it to third to prevent the run scoring. What the hell are you talking about?
  21. QUOTE (elrockinMT @ Jul 30, 2013 -> 07:35 PM) I thought it was a strike Was pretty much center-cut
  22. Rienzo has had unbelievably bad luck today
  23. I have to assume he's just talking out of his ass
  24. Missed a call to Swisher there. Horrible.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.