AddisonStSox

QUOTE(Dam8610 @ Jan 26, 2006 -> 05:17 PM) I've been saying for months the Bears should draft Leonard Pope. He's the best overall TE in the draft IMO. I'm as big a Lenoard Pope fan as the next guy, but, Vernon Davis is simply the best pro prospect at his position. He's as close to a consensus #1 as there is. A case can be made for Pope, but, if he's the second TE to go, he'll have nothing to hang his head about. He would be devestating in a Bears uniform.

I've always loved this guy. If any of you ever have the opportunity to watch this guy take a little bp, do yourself the favor and watch. He hits moon-shots. Absolute bombs.

QUOTE(DukeNukeEm @ Jan 25, 2006 -> 07:48 PM) Hes a pussy. We'll see if he pulls a Freddy Smoot and doesnt manage to bench 225. Stop. Quit while you're ahead.

There. 2005 Road Grey "Members Only" Dugout Jacket. I'll be with this group of schmos...we'll be hard to miss. Looking forward to seeing everyone. Should be a blast.

QUOTE(DBAH0 @ Jan 25, 2006 -> 06:58 PM) It could depend on whether Chad Greenway is still on the board. At the moment I'd say our picks for the 1st round would be Greenway, Carpenter, Michael Huff or one of the RT's like Winston Justice in that order. You're probably spot-on in your assessment. The 18th selection seems a bit far for Greenway to fall, but, you never know. You can never rule anything out. I'm not so sure Michael Huff will be there as well. I see Winston Justice falling a bit and he may end up somewhere around the 18th selection. There are just so many variables that still need to be worked out.

QUOTE(DBAH0 @ Jan 25, 2006 -> 06:37 PM) FWIW, the Cowboys have a need at LB, and if Carpenter is available at #18, I definitely think they could take him. Although knowing Parcells and Jones, we could easily trade up or down depending on the situation. According to doc, the Carpenter family already has a relationship with Parcells and we all know how big Parcells is on relationships, stand-up guys, hustle players, etc. The Cowboys are a definite possibility. No, not these Carpenters.

QUOTE(kyyle23 @ Jan 25, 2006 -> 01:13 PM) I wonder who is going to be the next converted-from-QB 1st rounder. It always happens to someone, last year it was Matt Jones. There ain't one in the bunch. If I had to guess right here, right now, I'd say you'll see Penn State's Michael Robinson, Texas A&M's Reggie McNeal, and Georgia's DJ Shockley make position changes at the next level. QUOTE(thedoctor @ Jan 25, 2006 -> 01:13 PM) thanks for your meaningful contribution to this thread. it will actually change after the senior bowl, after the combine and after the individual workouts. so i guess we should just quit talking about the draft until then. What he said. QUOTE(thedoctor @ Jan 25, 2006 -> 01:21 PM) no doubt. i am biased because i know him and his family, but he is really one of the most versatile linebackers i've seen. i actually think he might not be around when the bears pick. once he works out he is really going to move up, imo. he ran a 4.59 at 6.3, 265 pounds last year and that is just getting it done. You guys know how I feel about Carpenter at this point. I, too, am crazy about him and I think his game is going to translate very, very well; I expect him to be a household name in the not too distant future. I mean, I really think he is going to be special. That said, it'd be foolish to take him in the first round if there is an offensive playmaker available. If there isn't an offensive playemaker avail, albeit at the TE position (i.e. Pope), then I could see the Bears going BPA. If that is the case, I'd be comfortable with his selecion in the first round. If not the Bears, some teams I'd look for would be Seattle, New England, New York Giants, and maybe even Jacksonville.

First ballot. Best player to ever don a White Sox uniform. Now, what are we setting the over/under at for next season's games played? Seriously. Best of luck to Big Frank, but, baseball is a business and I won't believe he can play another full season until I see it.

Little do they know, Jeff Bajenaru is honored each and every day here at Soxtalk. Soxtalk: We Celebrate Mediocrity.

How deeply did it pain you when composing that list? Can the organization mend the loss of a trio I assume would make out at least the top five or six in Young-Gonzalez-Haigwood? Despite coming from near-obscurity in 2005 would Haigwood have competed for that final lefty spot on the Sox ML roster?

There is some "everything is bigger in Texas" joke here; I just can't seem to find it.

QUOTE(Fotop @ Jan 24, 2006 -> 04:52 PM) Gotta be Maurice Stovall (WR ND) for obvious reasons . It was wonderful to see him turn into the receiver everyone thought he could be this year. If Stovall had an extra year of Weis, we'd probably be talking about him as a solid first round pick. Sure, he won't burn you with his speed but he's got all the physical tools and great hands. I'd love to see the Bears grab him in the 2nd round, but I doubt he lasts that long. You and me both. If the Bears aren't considering a Terrell Owens--yes, I am being serious--or a Reggie Wayne, they need to at least take a long, hard look at a guy like Stovall in the early rounds. As far as I'm concerned, Muhsin Muhammad is worthless. He might be some sort of big-play threat, but, the guy can't catch the f***ing ball on a simple out or slant route. Are you kidding me!? Bradley showed some flashes before going down to injury, but, you never know with a guy like that. If the Bears HAD to go into next season with a trio of Muhammad, Stovall, and Berrian, I could live with it. What I'd like to see is something along the lines of Owens/Wayne, Muhammad, Stovall, Berrian/Randel-El. Fotop, watch your boy at the Senior Bowl, he's already generating a lot of buzz in only the first couple of days. If he has a day at the Senior Bowl, he will go in the early-mid second round; if he doesn't product, he may slide to the Bears in the second round. I just question Angelo's willingness to take a WR in the second round after Bradley's early success.

How about a former Sox: Jose Valentin = Freddie Mercury plus The Frito Bandito = +

QUOTE(3E8 @ Jan 23, 2006 -> 09:43 PM) This literally had me laughing out loud. Cheat's still takes the cake. A Greatest American Hero reference? Are you kidding me? Absolutely brilliant.

I'm officially in, gang. I'm even going to attempt to get in on the after-party party. Gonna be fun.

QUOTE(redandwhite @ Jan 23, 2006 -> 06:31 PM) red sox apologist? perhaps im missing the humor. Rest assured you aren't missing any humor. Can't sneak anything past you.

QUOTE(redandwhite @ Jan 23, 2006 -> 06:09 PM) there is no relevance to that tag. Don't make me do a show of hands.

Define homo-eroticism.

QUOTE(3E8 @ Jan 23, 2006 -> 05:02 PM) Hard to knock this move at just $1 million. It becomes a lot easier when you realize there is no option on a 2007 season and he'll be pretty much shelfed for the majority of 2006.

QUOTE(IlliniKrush @ Jan 23, 2006 -> 04:59 PM) Can i puke in your toilet? Make sure to check your PMs over the next couple days.

s***. If simulated games ever count, the National League is in a heap of trouble.

Is there anyway we can change Red's tag to be "Red Sox Apologist" without his permission? ...just so new-comers know what they're getting themselves into.

Looks like somebody might be in attendance. Stay tuned.

QUOTE(Flash Tizzle @ Jan 22, 2006 -> 12:54 PM) I knew this comparison was coming the minute I typed my post. Now I'll humor you: yes, they envy our rings. Point is, I wouldn't mind Williams creating trade scenarios which don't necessarily help us immediately, but rather, have the potential of reeping high rewards several years down the line. For example: I wouldn't mind if trading Contreras netted our minor leagues several quality pitching prospects. We're not exactly overloaded in that department. I like we're you're headed with this arguement, Flash, and you're making very valid points. IMHO, the types of moves the Tribe are able to make at this juncture are not the types of moves Williams and company have the liberty to make in 2006. I believe he's gone on record as saying he's looking to compete for another Championship in 2006--hence the Thome and Vazquez moves. After 2006, I expect to see a year or two of re-tooling with the Sox. You'll be seeing guys like Contreras and Crede out of the picture, hoping to land a similar package in return. That said, I'm just as comfortable holding on to Contreras throughout 2006, allowing him to pitch his ass off in a walk year to help our defense of the title. If were weren't primed for another pennant chase in 2006, I'd be calling for the same moves. EDIT: Remember: the White Sox were a very lucky/healthy team in 2005. We're just one blown arm away from needing that sixth starter in 2006. I'm quite happy winning back-to-back Championships and sitting through a year or two of re-tooling.

Happy B-Day, buddy.