moochpuppy

Haha, nice. I might have to check it out. Leisure Suit Larry I only had one of the games. Leisure Suit Larry 3: Passionate Patti in Pursuit of the Pulsating Pectorals.

That whole wave thing looks like the Boston Breakers from the old USFL team.

It's about time!!! Are they going to be strickly back on PC or are they going to make versions for XBox, PS2 and Gamecube?

I think mine must have been placed on backorder.

That's a pretty expensive f***.

With the Sox picking up his option I wonder who they'll now hire to try and piss him off?

I'd love to poke my chop stick around that Asian dish.

Someone's been counterfeiting nickels.

I think it's no. Nash equilibrium means that the players dont wanna get out of their choice because they chose what was the best for them. If they have profitable deviation, they wanna get out of their choice. It's hard to explain in english. This was correct rafa. Thanks to all of you for your help. What was correct? My answer? Yes, if a profile has profitable unilateral deviation then it doesn't contain Nash Equilibria (that we knew) but if it contains profitable bilateral deviation, it's irrelevant, so then it also contains no Nash Equilibria.

All God's beers are equal in His eye.

Wow, been here just over a week? You're a quick learner.

It could have been worse:

I think it's no. Nash equilibrium means that the players dont wanna get out of their choice because they chose what was the best for them. If they have profitable deviation, they wanna get out of their choice. It's hard to explain in english. This was correct rafa. Thanks to all of you for your help.

I can't believe the mods would allow a thread like this that exploits men as sex objects!

Bengals over Texans Steelers over Cardinals Giants over Falcons Chiefs over Browns Colts over Jaguars Titans over Dolphins Buccaneers over Panthers Bears over Lions Redskins over Seahawks Vikings over Chargers Raiders over Jets Cowboys over Bills Rams over Ravens ***Packers over Eagles***

Can we have an occasional porn pic? Nope, this isn't sextalk.com This site does however have plenty of Soxual content.

Nash equilibrium: each player is making the optimal choice, given the other players´ choice. Sounds to me like it would be possible, not extremely likely, but possible, as long as the peoples optimal profits perfectly aligned with what the other party wanted to do. But that is just off of the top of my head. It has been 10 years since I had Micro... Well, on my e-mail to my professor I asked: "So if there is profitable deviation in the profile then it can't be Nash Equilibria?" He responded by adding "unilateral" between profitable and deviation and then typed exactly after my question. This would lead me to believe then that if both players had profitable deviation as opposed to unilateral, then Nash Equilibria is present in the profile.

Principals of Microeconomics.

I thought I remember seeing one or two of you and was wondering if you could answer this question: In game theory, when trying to find Nash Equilibria, it does not exsist if there is unilateral profitable deviation. But does it exsist if both players have profitable deviation? Thanks.

He hasn't done that in 14 seasons. What makes you think he'll change now?

Which is based on past Thomas tantrums.

Yeah, there's already one of those in town.

Maybe we already have our own "Castillo in waiting"? On the Thomas situation, he is the greatest hitter in Sox history but I real feel he is the cancer on this team. It's time for him to move on.

Wouldn't have mattered. :finger