bmags

Getting past Ramirez on 3-1 was huge. Can’t believe hard Carl is doin it

That package was from an even more unreliable place than the foodies, and if you care what they had to say, it was not Kelley that was the part that broke down it was over Vaughn

I think mid-round TEs are good value and it's a very versatile position. I also thought they had cut Graham and I'm kinda floored they hadn't but regardless tremble has some similarities to the TEs that have broken out.

I would say the soxtalk posters evaluating pitchers based on peripherals, stuff and improvement did a better job than the “if you remove their best starts they aren’t that good” evaluators

I did one after this and ended up with a very similar board except I got greedy and missed out on Moore CHI 32. Teven Jenkins OT Oklahoma State CHI 62. Landon Dickerson OC Alabama CHI 72. Davis Mills QB Stanford CHI 83. Zech McPhearson CB Texas Tech CHI 96. Tommy Tremble TE Notre Dame CHI 164. Chauncey Golston EDGE Iowa 2022 GB 3rd

We don't need him to improve? He has been a near .400 obp player since 2019 now and he hits RHP better than LHP. Seems good. Pretty sure he's a positive defender over Vaughn/Eloy He's not a platoon player on the As. He's their starting OFer. And he's a free agent at the end of the year, stop me if you've heard of the A's trading pending FAs before. But this is incredible analysis otherwise. It's easy for you to look up names, harder for you to know why you include them.

He was in decline in 2019 with a 147 wRC+? He was 15% better than average hitter in 2018, 50% better in 2019 and 30% better in 2020. Seems better than “yuck”

Why is canha yuck?

Telling Mish they made “aggressive” offers for our 28 year old AAA catcher is ?

*worlds biggest stroke off motion* https://amp.miamiherald.com/sports/spt-columns-blogs/barry-jackson/article249320890.html?__twitter_impression=true

Poll: if Giolito throws a perfect 9 innings, do the white Sox win?

Me trying to believe the sensible "lineup construction isn't that important" in the face of the worst lineup combos possible

True sorry mainly meant pay much more than you'd expect Canha to get (given pending FA status) so that we can pry him away earlier in season and due to our desperation. I like Canha too, but spending capital to plug a single-year hole sucks. But he's good!

I feel like we're going to pay a boatload for like mark canha

I keep looking at this lineup thinking there aren't enough positions for the number of bad offensive players he found time for but damn it he made it fit somehow.

I mean this would have been bad in 2008. This is like "mark kotsay should be our leadoff hitter" territory.

glad we are already at the point where we need to set the roster against the managers common tendencies.

I actually think that is the least compelling case to not do this. The best case to me to not pause is you delay potentially hundreds of thousands of doses and increase exposure for that population to a disease with worse effects. But the cdc also isn't you know, per se, shooting REAL covid into people and can't control that outcome as much. They can control the vaccine rollout and if they believe they can prevent serious outcomes for some X of people that is not an easy decision to weigh. There was a kneejerk "SIX OUT OF 7 MIlLION" but it really isn't clear what the numerator is. Because of the similiarities between AZ, I'd certainly put my chips in it being similarly low, but UK has recommended under 30s to try to get a different vaccine. They did not pause to get there, and that may be the better approach, but this also may be a worse or or much worse for a specific demo with J&J than it was for AZ, we don't know yet. But for the vaccine hesitant, I don't know that getting vaccines in 2 weeks of "Up to 75 cases of blood clotting reported, CDC says vaccine is still safe" is like a silver bullet here either, even if all of twitter shouts at them to learn statistics.

I figured that the group we are actually worried about would be the vaccine hesitant not full anti-vaxxers. And as this thread has posted over the year every single poll showing vaccine hesitancy from when it was good ("people don't trust trump!") to now when its bad ("trump voters won't get the vaccine!") and the numbers have continued to go down slowly but consistently. The EU handled the AZ blood clotting situation differently, but the biggest difference causing a schism is many many people in the UK knew many many people who got the AZ vaccine and were fine, whereas EU rollout had been slow and stirring anger at the company for how it handled low supply and its UK contract. The US could have decided not to pause, but I get their worry that most of the J&J vaccine was given very recently, and this side effect is reported one-three weeks after the shot is given. It is likely this continues to be a rare phenomenon and the numerator is as low as they thought, and the pausing was unneccessary. But it's also a possibility that the numerator is decently higher and the pause allowed them to better target the vaccine to the right groups as well as signal to the health care providers the correct way to treat this particular blood clot. If the US did not have 2 other vaccines currently that were alread much better at producing high volumes, maybe the US just presses on like the UK did with AZ, but when it's all factored in I think it is a difficult call on its face - and I think "don't say stuff because the worst people may use it against you" isn't a very compelling part of the reasoning. I'd be more on board with CDC/FDA at least meeting with some key health provider groups + medical journals + select journalists that cover health for a quick conference call before the press release and an immediate press conference, but the actual decision is harder than this thread makes it out to be.

I know this is jest but from the replay it did look like madrigal and stopped and re-set at third before starting when it was clear ball deflected.

This is just punditry. Unlike the EU pause, they didn't just pause due to an uncertain correlation. They are providing actionable guidance of a specific kind of bloodclot appearing in a demographic, and calling it a pause while they provide more guidance on treatment and look for more info on what traits might create this reaction. Now if Biden starts pulling a macron or other EU heads of state and start saying completely innaccurate things about the vaccine then we may have to worry, but I don't think the AZ situation with EU will be directly comparable.

Really hoped you were going to say he was related to bachman turner overdrive/tal bachman family.

This has been really miserable but this schedule has been rough. Not sure how but they need to get a serious PG upgrade, this is just ridiculous how trash that position is. Sato is a fine 2nd unit player.

Isn't steverson back with our org in some capacity? Maybe we could give moncada some 1-on-1 time with him again to get him on track.

the decision seems correct as the demographic affected is more likely to have a higher than the 6 in 7 million number (women 18-49 have likely received far fewer than that), and the fact that it's a rare kind and will help to spread communications to hospitals and doctors on warning signs/treatment. The communication is annoying but not sure there is anyway to avoid "J&J causes bloodclots, pulled from shelves!" type headlines with twitter/social media.