Steff

He was 19 at the time. An adult.

if you know his son personally, are they that type that steals and breaks in? what is the take on them. Jr was around the neighborhood a lot and mostly minds his own business. Before he was able to drive he played a lot with the other teens on the lake. KW has a small gas boat and him and several others used to ride around the lake in it. I never heard any isses. He was/is a pretty timid kid. The older one.. had a few parties when mom and dad were away 2 summers ago and got busted for that. There was some minor damage done to a few neighborhood houses and one dock was messed up. Maybe this was big brother's prodding..? That's my opinion anyway. Also, I have no idea what kind of father KW is. I'm sure he's strict.. but any more than anyone else I do not know. I know that he isn't around a lot and his wife spends a lot of time with her mom who lives with them. Maybe it's the lack of supervision that contributed to this...? Remember the Mendendez brothers were into petty crime in the begining. And NO, I am NOT comparing this incident to the Mendendez brothers killing their parents.. ONLY their early crimes.

I read that garbage once, not going to bother again... and I'm done with this exchange. Yes...since my comments in this thread did not involve you in any way, shape or form, maybe it's best if you STFU. I agree. And my comments to HSC had nothing to do with you either, yet you felt obligated not to "STFU" about it...? Touche clujer... eh?

The "KW news" isn't news. It's rumor/speculation. Until something actually happens, it's nothing more than that. And I don't expect you to name names when it comes to your "source(s)". All I ask is that when you "know something", you give specific details, and perhaps the qualifications of the source -- not specifics about the source him/herself. There is a difference between the two. "Stunk up the joint"? I've noticed that since I've joined this board, I've brought a little bit of life and added a different perspective to quite a few threads. Maybe I'm missing something, but is that a bad thing? Loyalty is one thing -- vagueness for the sake of being vague is a complete other. Clujer.. There was nothing more to be specific about. Michelle laid out the facts she was given and I simply stated that I had been told the same information. The facts were laid out there (KW messing with players, making lineups, the issue with Carlos, the cell phone calls, etc, etc..) What more did you want? As far as my stinking up the joint comment.. it was in regards specifically to THIS issue. You said you don't care yet you keep going on starting s*** with us...? I can't recall ever being vague about this matter. Mainly because I had nothing to do with it's birth and only posted to agree that I had heard the same things Michelle posted. I guess I don't understand where your beef is. You're saying one thing one minute and another the next.

Clujer.. I'd just like to take a minute to address your claim here, maybe explain it a bit. First of all.. I did NOT break the KW news here for this exact reason. Some people on here are f***ING ASSHOLES (feel free to include yourself in that group... or not). Michelle did, and bless her brass balls for doing so. So first.. get the facts straight BEFORE you make stupid ass ASSumptions and post bull s***. Second, I would never EVER in a million years tell anyone but my husband who tells me thing about the Sox. Most of the time he's either there with me anyway, or reading my emails. There's a little thing called integrity that I hold high when it relates to such matters. Perhaps you don't have the same type of relationship with your friends, but it's something that I value. So no.. you'll never get a source out of me (and likely not Michelle either). I'm sorry if you don't like it, but that's the way it is. If you don't like the things we post, then don't respond to them. You said you could care less... but you sure did stink up the joint with this thread. If you can't respect my loyalty to my friends then don't bother reading or posting to or about me. It's pretty simple. Oh.. Happy Mother's Day everyone.

Well gosh darn... had I know this was going on, I'd have jumped back in this thread

I got off just in time last night.. just as the puter went off.. so did the power. Up till then, great show! The chat was great. I was LMAO!! Thanks for working so hard on the broadcast guys. It's appreciated!

The link is in the thread above!

RDW.. PLEASE call R and tell him I am soooo in love with him this week !! I picked him up on my fantasy team and he's gotten me 47 points already!!!

4 years now...finishing school. lol...this is DEFINITELY not my profession of choice. just pays the bills pretty well. ATM deposits can be a pain, if the depositor can't punch in the numbers correctly. I think my major problem are the middle aged women...If you worked at a bank for 2 years, you know EXACTLY what I mean. Personally I found the social security folks to be the worst. And men more than woman. Usually the woman would cash the check and take it home (under the mattress or whatever) but the men would fight about every little fee. They were quite comical that I remember. But I couldn't blame them. That's all most of them have and they just want to make sure it's safe. I did it in high school. The money was really good. $5.35 an hour back then

I was a bank teller for 2 years during high school and I have to say... some folks just don't like the direct deposit. Personally I would never use the ATM deposit (I used to reconcille it and it was ALWAYS wrong). A lot of companies DON'T offer DD so it isn't the employees fault. I do have DD, but when I need cash I do go directly to the teller to cash a check. Sometimes the ATM is down, others are in line, etc, etc.. Perhaps a change in profession is in order?

Doh! I never read all of the thread before responding

I find it interesting that they met over 3 days.. must have been phone meetings.

LOL.. No worries CK. It defeats the purpose to respond to the idiots.

I was told end of this week. When I asked "Friday? Saturday? Sunday..?" I was told "before Monday".

I was told end of the week.

Zach.. no offense to you at all.. but I kinda have to lean towards the "kids" taking the responsibility for themselves on this one. I'm hearing that 35+ of the 50 they identified so far are over 18. That in itself means if they are charged, they are going to be charged as adults. I remember the good old days of telling my grama & grampa I was going over to a friends house to "study" only to meet up at church hill for a few brews with the gang. Had I gotten caught for underage drinking I definitely wouldn't have thought of blaming them. And they were VERY strict with me. Especially in this day and age... I think a 17 or 18 year old is MORE than capable of being liable for their actions. 13 year olds are having sex for Pete's sake!! It's a different world out there. If they can handle jobs, and cars, and bills (credit card, cell phones, etc, etc..), which are adult things.. then they can handle this. JMO.

Slander...??

I saw a draft copy of his book.. and it was sweet. A lot of facts in it (you know what I mean HSC). A lot of unhappy people that's for sure.

With HSC being there .. and her expected "rant" can you guys tape the show for me? I really don't want to miss it and I have plans I can not alter to listen.

I did.. and no way am I giving up any tickets!!

Guys.. I can't keep up cause I have auditors here... they keep coming in my office. Geezus.. can't they see I am busy!

Paul up Strike hit 2 out double

Sox lead 2-0

Maggs up foul ball hit HR!!