Texsox

http://www.snopes.com/photos/signs/austria.asp worth the click

QUOTE(IlliniKrush @ Feb 1, 2007 -> 02:06 PM) That's fine with me. I thought i could throw that in there in case some little toddler ends up with pink sox gear. I'd never buy it, but let's say you go to take your niece and she's sporting it. However if Tex says no exceptions, then no exceptions damn it! Well, a toddler may be excused, but her uncle should fix that ASAP. I was thinking if YASNY showed up in a pink cap and jersey, he shouldn't be allowed either, not just chicks. I kid, because I care™

QUOTE(southsider2k5 @ Feb 2, 2007 -> 06:33 AM) A Cubs fan. It figures. And Mark took a photo with him??! That proves he isn't a true member of the SOX community. If he really was a true member of the Sox community, he would have smashed the guy's cell phone and screamed Sox Rulzzzz!

Birthdays Today! Ten of Them and I do not reecognize any of the names. But hey, Happy Birthday!

QUOTE(southsideirish71 @ Feb 1, 2007 -> 08:20 PM) The only thing holding Apple back is being locked into proprietary hardware. If Jobs takes the gloves off and has Leopard ready for all intel based systems then we would be ready for a fight. This had me thinking. Who/What is Apple? Hardware? Software? OS? Balance of the three? It's not Motorola chips anymore. Would Apple be Apple if Dell started making computers that ran on the Mac OS? Would Apple be Apple if they offered a choice of Mac OS or Windows on their hardware? Would Apple exist if everyone was smart enough to use a PC?

QUOTE(soxwon @ Feb 1, 2007 -> 05:10 PM) Right now ill rank the contenders 1 Obama 2 Hillary 3 Edwards 4 Biden GOP 1 Mccain 2 guliani 3 romney 4 huckabee 5 brownback just my opinion, who differs? Edwards (most electable in the general) Clinton Obama Biden (his comments dropped him) GOP

QUOTE(Soxy @ Feb 1, 2007 -> 03:13 PM) Weird science. It was weird, my senior year I lived with 3 other girls and 3 of us had the same personality type. The other girl was an ENPJ. She was faaaaaaaaaar less cool than us ISTJ girls (although getting that many emotionally reserved perfectionists in one place was, uh, special). I'm ta-ing Psych of personality and we're doing Jung, so I thought I would brush up on his personality types. Personality was one of my favorites. My favorite was Abnormal and watching the hypochondriacs self diagnose all their problems. How are you studies going? Are you achieving a good balance between TA and student? Your Type is ENFPExtrovertedIntuitiveFeelingPerceiving Strength of the preferences % 22756222

QUOTE(danman31 @ Feb 1, 2007 -> 02:47 PM) This is reason enough to hate the city of Boston forever... Men accused of hoax plead not guilty CNN Video of coverage Wow people are dumb. I don't know how no one recognized them, but I'm ashamed to be a human being right now. F*cking idiots. Also, it was supposedly done in 7 other cities as a marketing campaign, but didn't cause a scare anywhere else. OMG! They have "circuit boards"! If you are Turner Broadcasting you have to be LOVING this to no end. They could never have afforded this much publicity. We are at Terror alert Yellow. These people take that stuff seriously and knew what to do. In case you don't regularly visit http://www.dhs.gov/xinfoshare/reportincidents/ here's the scoop

QUOTE(Balta1701 @ Feb 1, 2007 -> 02:54 PM) Interestingly enough, that has not been the strategy of Karl Rove in the last 2 Presidential elections at all, in fact, Mr. Rove's strategy has been to specifically state that the strategy you outline is wrong. Rove's strategy was to turn out the base and try to get 50%+1 voters out of the base, and it succeeded in electing GWB 1 time, and came very very close a 2nd. Rove did not care at all that Kerry beat Mr. Bush significantly in so-called "Independent" or swing voters, because he turned out enough of his base to get a win.. Strategist have pointed out that while the GOP didn't fight for the undecided, the Dems did not succeed in getting them to the polls in enough numbers. It's semantics and spin. The other factor is you have to energize your base enough to actually go vote.

Dear ONE Member, Yesterday, the House of Representatives voted not only to protect the $1 billion that was in jeopardy, but went even one step further and allocated an additional $450 million to fighting global poverty in 2007. This is the largest amount ever committed by the United States to fight AIDS, TB, and Malaria, three of the world's most devastating diseases. This is the first step in an almost unbelievable turn of events that wouldn't have been possible without you. Literally hundreds of thousands of lives will be saved because of ONE members' advocacy. You sent over 200,000 letters in January alone - and 142 members of Congress signed on to the Durbin-Brownback and Lee-Shays "Dear Colleague" letters. Here is what Congresswoman Barbara Lee and Congressman Christopher Shays had to say about your efforts: I want to than k the ONE Campaign and all of it s member s for adding their energy and their voice s to the global s truggle again s t HIV/AID S and extreme poverty. The letter s and call s made by ONE campaign member s epitomize the power of what i s po s s ible when one per s on ta k e s a s tand for what i s right. Each of you ha s s tood up to be counted becau s e you k now that s topping the s pread of the global HIV/AID S pandemic i s po s s ible, and that together we can turn that po s s ibility into a reality. - Repre s entative Barbara Lee (Democrat, CA-9) Although there have been remar k able achievement s in combating HIV/AID S in Africa and around the world, the truth i s we've not yet been able to k eep pace with it s s pread. I am grateful for the a s s i s tance of the ONE Campaign in s upport of the Lee- S hay s letter reque s ting additional funding for program s to combat HIV/AID S , tuberculo s i s , and malaria. 92 member s of congre s s s igned the letter and we couldn't have done it without the ONE Campaign. - Repre s entative Chri s topher S hay s (Republican, CT-4) Thank your member of Congress for co-signing the Lee-Shays letter. You sent a clear message to Congress about how critical this funding was to you and your representative listened. Now we need to send them your thanks for stepping up their efforts against global poverty. We want our allies in this battle to remember your support as they begin the 2008 budget process and decide future funding for the fight against extreme poverty. We are building a movement, and this victory is just more evidence of what's possible. We fought off what would have been a devastating billion dollar blow and improved our lot in the process. And we did all of it while Congress was making some very tough choices. Working together in the years to come, we'll have the opportunity to redefine what's possible again and again. Congratulations on your part in this. The battle isn't over yet as the resolution still has to clear the Senate, but this is a huge first step and the members of the House who represented us deserve our enormous thanks for making it happen. Send a thank you to your representative for fighting global poverty. Thank you for your voice, Josh Peck, ONE.org

We probably should define center. Generally, candidates can view an election as having three groups. The first are their strongest supporters who will vote for them regardless. There are a bunch of them here, even though they won't admit it, but they will vote for the candidate from their party regardless. So those two groups are spoken for, they are either voting for or against you and there is very little you can do to win/lose those votes. The fight becomes for the "undecided" or "middle" group. Who can sway the most out of that group. Substitute policies, sports teams in the two team city, or Coke vs. Pepsi. The concept is accurate. Getting back to the topic title, of al;l the issues facing America and the World today, isn't the Iraq War the most obvious place we need new decisions? Remember Iraq was going to kill us all with their WMD, the Government was torturing civilians. Mission Accomplished in solving those two issues. We didn't find any WMD and we have forced a regime change. Right or wrong, we achieved those goals.

http://www.votevets.org/ Interesting stuff. I am going to hell, but they did it on purpose. When the speaker said on the other hand, I thought of Forrest Gump and laughed. "But you ain't got no hand?!" Probably not the reaction they were looking for. With one of two exceptions above, I agree with this 100%. A couple are unmeasurable and too vague for my taste.

QUOTE(IlliniKrush @ Jan 30, 2007 -> 03:10 PM) No man will go to a game with a chick anyone wearing pink sox gear. *Unless she is 8 or younger. fixed

Reminds me of 1959 when the air raid sirens were turned on to celebrate the AL Pennant. Baseball fans, and especially Sox fans, knew what it was, others were panicking.

QUOTE(southsider2k5 @ Feb 1, 2007 -> 01:36 PM) It bothers me when the change in thinking is done simply because they other side changed their minds. I agree and would add, or for political gain. But we are getting to the point that as soon as someone can tag a flip flop label on someone, deserved or not, it is labeled as a negative, especially if you don't agree with the second decision. That's what concerns me.

The system needs an overhaul. that is obvious, what isn't obvious is what to do. As soon as you push here something squirts out there that you don't want. I don't know how many kids you have, I suspect none, but the small increases in assistance for each child doesn't come close to meeting their demands. Having more kids isn't a ticket to wealth in this system. Plus, the money in theory is to help the children, do you really think the American taxpayer is going to deny food and shelter to an infant or child? It's easy to fall into the "we're not going to give the adult more money for having that child, but that just hurts the child and causes more of a drain. It is a very tangled mess we gradually got ourselves into, and it probably will be a gradual fix.

Since when is standing by a bad decision something we covet in a leader? There is a difference in changing your mind on a daily basis and changing your mind when new information becomes available, or if your original idea isn't panning out. Are we treading on dangerous ground when we do not allow elected leaders to adjust the sails? Isn't it a bit of insanity to think we always make the right decision the first time?

I believe was are treading on dangerous ground here when as a general rule, making a new decision with new information, is considered a bad thing. Not specific to anyone person and any specific situation, why is standing behind a bad decision a good thing and willing to admit you made a mistake and changing your position a bad thing?

QUOTE(Jenksismyb**** @ Feb 1, 2007 -> 10:10 AM) Too bad we waste a lot of this money taking care of people who don't deserve it. It sickens me to watch an old withering person who's worked hard their entire life go without adequate health coverage or adequate retirement money (ESPECIALLY veterans) when undeserving people who are too lazy to get a job contine to reep the benefits of our old, out-dated and entirely too socialistic welfare system. Perhaps I should change my sig from 'Work harder, millions of Americans on welfare depend on you,' to ' Work harder, millions of Americans on welfare depend on you while the old deserving Americans are left out.' I know, doesn't really have anything to do with the thread topic, but this sentence got me thinking. I basicaly agree with you. But, just like much of the foreign aid we dish out, these programs also keep desperate people from stealing and other socially unacceptable actions. At some point it becomes a cost/benefit analysis. Keeping them in prison is more costly, and probably more "fair", than having them on public assistance programs.

QUOTE(Sonik22 @ Jan 31, 2007 -> 06:26 PM) I borrowed a friends Rush cd and now im really into them! Its basically all i've been listening to since i got it! What are everybody's feelings towards Rush? We had a long discussion about why they aren't in the R&R HoF.

QUOTE(BobDylan @ Feb 1, 2007 -> 02:33 AM) I voted no way, but I can't remember the last time I paid for MSOffice or any software whatsoever. In other words, I like pirates. And am I delirous, or did there used to be a day when Microsoft Word came free on Windows machines? QUOTE(vandy125 @ Feb 1, 2007 -> 07:58 AM) I think that it was Microsoft Works that came for free. Old people will remember when there wasn't a Works program. Word was bundled with most new Windows machines. Then Works came out as a home version of Office and now that gets bundled. That was also in the days before "suites" when you would buy a word processor (Word, AmiPro, Word Perfect, Word Star, etc.) a spread sheet (Lotus 1,2,3, or Excel), perhaps a data base program (D-Base). This was also the dark ages when Macs and PCs didn't talk to each other. When you couldn't always open an AmiPro document in Word and vice versa.

I bought Logitech's MX3200 keyboard and mouse yesterday. I had been using an aged keyboard on my old laptop, and a small travel mouse, this is sooooo much better. With this setup, I think I can chase Southsider for the coveted 100,000 post mark. I really can't believe the difference. I was thinking of getting Microsoft's bluetooth version, but decided on this one instead. One small set up issue, it won't work through my USB hub, it has to be plugged in direct.

QUOTE(NUKE @ Jan 31, 2007 -> 10:08 PM) http://www.courierpostonline.com/apps/pbcs.../701310347/1003 If U.S. Airways can afford to buy Delta Airlines for 10 billion........including 5 billion in cash........then how is it that they can get dump their pension liability ( worth 3 billion ) on the taxpayers? What a rip off. Side Note: Which is one reason why privatizing social security worries me. As a society we will not step over a senior citizen who has worked hard all their life and is now destitute because the company he invested in made poor decisions. So the tax payer will wind up picking up the tab. And I've always kind of thought that Social Security was basically unemployment insurance and public aid with a better marketing plan. And we should be happy that we live in a country that is so blessed we can take care of people. The vast majority of countries on the planet would have to stand by and watch people starve.

not bad

Thank you, that one is cool. I also just thought to check the Pawn shops in the area.