Texsox

He's in LA., certainly he knew at least one crazy cajun who would have cleaned that problem right out. I gar-on-tee that problem would have been solved and weeeee eee, them's good for ya!

Which female makes you laugh? I always enjoyed Jane Curtain, but for the most part there doesn't seem to be a lot of really funny females. Certainly none in the same category as John Belushi, Robin Williams, Ed Murphy, Richard Pryor, etc.

================================================================== T O P 5 C L A S S I C Absolut Top5 ================================================================== October 21, 2004 (Today's list was originally published on January 24, 2000) The Top 14 Pickup Lines Used by Chefs 14> "Uh, yeah... I invented Spaghetti-O's." 13> "You're twice as sweet as a creme brulee -- and less drippy." 12> "Y'know, this hat and apron would look a lot less silly at the foot of your bed." 11> "Hey good lookin', whatcha got reducing over a low flame until the sauce is creamy, then pouring the reduction over the already sauteed veal, adding in a dash of kirsch and flambeing just before presentation?" 10> "Your eyes are like limpid pools of chicken stock." 9> "Whisk, schmisk. I'll show you how a *real* man fluffs butter." 8> "I know we've just met, but will you marinade me?" 7> "Wanna lick my beater?" 6> "How do you like your eggs? Poached, scrambled, or fertilized?" 5> "Hey, weren't you in my 'Introduction to Melons' class?" 4> "I've made thousands of women cream... of tarragon soup!" 3> "Get the buttah." 2> "One cheeseburger coming up. Would you like a little paradise with that? and Topfive.com's Number 1 Pickup Line Used by Chefs... 1> "Mmmm, you look good enough to filet -- but I think I'd rather bone you." [ The Top 5 List www.topfive.com ] [ Copyright 2000, 2004 by Chris White ] [ To subscribe: Top5Classic-subscribe@topica.com ]

Just for the record, rabbits are great pets, in smaller numbers. Mine is litter box trained and cute as a . . . well cute as a bunny. They chew when young but quickly grow out of that, no worse than a puppy.

Amen to that. I agree with the end result of making the campaign responsible for the ads. I just have a hard time telling you, that you cannot take an ad out in the newspaper supporting your candidate. I feel like I'm restricting your speech. Yet, I really dislike these newest groups.

Was that a car? It looked like a spare tire for a Hummer I was trying to see the person inside, they must have been s***ting a brick.

I'm beginning the think the only winners in a presidential campaign are the tv, radio, and newspaper outlets who are paid in advance for running political campaign ads. $$ = Increased odds of winning or better yet your $$$$ > opponents $$ = Greater Odds of Winning Mr. Smith does not go to Washington in the 21st Century.

LMAO. I think he ruined someone's day there.

That is a l o o o o ng drive. Think they faked the Alzheimers for a free $1200 cab ride? 1/2 through the trip he found out they didn't have the money. Dude, before I passed the El Paso city limits, I'd of had 1/2 the money in my pocket.

I agree. It isn't just money but celebrity that gathers publicity. No one os tuning in to hear what Juan Hinojosa from Wheeling has to say about the issues, but they will to hear Dennis Miller or Barry Bonds.

It's all part of the game. The Swift Boat Vets have received over $13,000,000 to air their commercials. Free speech is a wonderful thing. I love all the GOP groups who have contributed to Nadar's campaign.

I would think he wants publicity, if that comes from a fight, so be it. In that regard, he isn't much different than any other docu-drama producer. The worse thing that could have happened to the Swift Boat guys was to be ignored. And human nature has those that are ignored, upping the hype until they get noticed.

Isn't Israel4ever a lawyer?

As I said, you took the high road and that is commendable and classy I hope if you ever make an error, the other side has the same restraint and class.

I hope they watched how to close a LCS on the road last night. Although without the Evil Empire, no matter who wins the WS, I'll be happy for the winner and sad for the loser so I can only hope for exciting, clean, fair, baseball without controversy.

In defense of attorney's and Title Companies. When I dealt with companies setting up shop in foreign countries something always stuck with me. When you buy some real estate in the US you are 100% assured that the title is clear. That someone isn't going to pound on your door demanding you vacate their property. We have so many attorneys because we have so many rights and freedoms. [/back to lawyer bashing]

First of all congratulations on doing the right thing but . . . I believe the Title Company is normally obligated to cover these types of mistakes. They are the insurance to the buyer and seller. You may wish to contact your attorney, or perhaps a new one.

Well said winodj.

I believe if we judged candidates by their motives to be President, we could not vote for anyone who wants the job. There has to be a tremendous amount of hubris on a candidates part to desire the office of President. To subject yourself, your family, your relations, and your friends, to the scrutiny that political life brings with, is not just for the pure of soul. There has to be a conceited motive, a hunger for power, a thirst for personal accolades driving the candidates. I accept that on both sides of the isle.

From winodj in the SSI thread. It is always nice when someone takes the time to state their opinion with grace and style.

One of the interesting developments in the 20th Century was the explosion of technology in the field of communications. Unlike the 18th Century, for example, the later half of the 20th is documented in a wide variety of medias. Movies, and the sub-genre documentaries are just one of those medias. In a sense, docudramas are a new art form, a mixture of fact, opinion, and fiction. Time will tell how they are judged. I wonder how 23rd Century humankind will judge America 2004 based on the surviving records. Will they look at a DVD and wonder how we could be so primitive? Just like we look at stone tools and wonder how they survived.

As I was reading an opinion piece that pointed out, again, that Kerry has voted against any increases in miltary spending, I got a thought. Why not amend the constitution to stop Congress from voting on military spending? With the war on terror and everything else, shouldn't we just give the military everything they think they need? Why subject the military to the idiots in congress that know nothing about running a military. The rest of the money can be used for the other government programs.

Perhaps saying Bush should act isn't 100% accurate. The US is the alpha-leader in the UN. An all out effort to influnce the UN has not been taken and I believe it has not because we are in an election year. I would hope that this adminstration will take a more active role in this starting in about 2 weeks. I know it is difficult for a lame duck President to make major policy shifts, but he should and he should have the backing of both parties. If he is re-elected, then even more reasons to do the right thing. I was going to write before it is too late, but sadly it already is too late for 70,000 people.

I hope he had some good porn stored on his hard drive, since he wasn't getting any.

By not cutting taxes We are at time quick to help those in other countries and can somehow ignore those around us. A hungary Iraqi receives aid if he stays in Iraq, nothing if he travels 7,000 miles to the aid and moves in next door.