Texsox

Pena isn't, but sometimes you have to make a sacrifice for your team

6 for Mark

I'm spoiled

from a KC board They do have smart fans

Quiet game. Where are our bats?

When will they move Dontrell up in the order? maybe have him bat 7th?

Dammit my kid wants that 14 jersey

I just heard that Bush paid $40,000 less in 2003 than in 2002. I guess his tax cuts are working

How will you celebrate the 25th Aniversary?

Be happy with Brian

Not after you started posting

Beer Warning

Wouldn't you have 101 wins After last season's start, I am giddy and dancing. Something I didn't do until July last year.

Oh, Yeah. The season started and we are winning!

Exit: Colon, Gordon, Everett, Alomar, Graffy, Daubach Disappointing 2003: Kong, Koch, Mark (1st half) Question Marks: Ozzie, Lead off, closer, defense up the middle Additions: Zero!?, Uribe History. Gee, I have no idea why I was pessimistic.

Would this be alcohol induced to sober?

A couple key questions we had at the start of the season. CF - I like A-Row's Defense, miss Carl's bat. Overall this has been good. 2nd base - Despite the 2 errors the Harris - Uribe combo has been fine. Kong - Wow! Starting Pitching - Colon vs. Wright is a no brainer. Still too early to tell if the rest of the staff will pick up the pace. Bull Pen - No closer has emerged. Still a problem. Frank - Signs of age? Slow start? Adjustment to #4 spot? Hope he comes around. Ozzie - After a mistake opening day, seems solid. I like the running and attitude. No new questions except possibly Jose's errors. Overall, I'm really happy with what I have seen so far.

You speak the truth. Once American's remember we have a representative government, that these people are elected to represent us, and we need to bombard them with our opinions, we will continue to have this partisan b.s.

The fans have the Cubs 8 and Sox 12. So we move up a little bit there.

Link A couple great quotes: Go Kong Go! I would love to know what Frank's SB goal is

You are joking. An unbiased source?

I think you can. It isn't an all or nothing situation. An easy to understand example would be this; since the terrorists all entered through Canada, we should shut down the Candian border and toss a few bombs their way. That would be over doing the response and I think most Americans would protest. Using your logic, if Bush decided to nuke the world, since we can't seem to find those WMD or Bin Laden, we shouldn't complain because we wanted a response. I use those extreme examples (at least extreme in my book) to show it is a matter of degrees of what each person decides is correct. Some Americans believe sending soldiers to die in Iraq was too much. Others may believe bombing mosques is too much, still others may believe nuclear (no matter how it is pronounced) is too much, still others believe any response is ok. Each American wanted an appropriate response.

I guess this proves the media isn't liberal, despite what Rush says.