Jump to content

35thstreetswarm

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    2,373

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

 Content Type 

Everything posted by 35thstreetswarm

  1. 35thstreetswarm
    No he sure isn't. He has one insane 7-WAR season and a handful of 1 WAR seasons. He had a 4.29 ERA in 2019. I get that he's young and cost-controlled and has huge upside, but so does Kopech, and I'm really nervous that one year from now we wouldn't trade Kopech for Snell straight up.
  2. 35thstreetswarm
    I don’t think there’s much to unlock. They’d just walk through the open door into the room full of treasure
  3. 35thstreetswarm
    Joc is perfect for us; really all we need on the offensive side. This team is so dynamic, and with so many realistic paths to improvement through internal development or smart personnel moves down the line. I'd love to keep it that way for as long as possible.
  4. 35thstreetswarm
    Crochet above Kopech already? Seems like similar profile but shorter track record (and obviously no injury...yet...which could be viewed as a negative). I'd have to think that would piss MK off. Hope he comes back strong and dominates this year.
  5. 35thstreetswarm
    Springer is a luxury with this lineup. If you want to preemptively cry about something at this bright moment in the team’s history, at least move it to the Bauer thread.
  6. 35thstreetswarm
    I don't think you'd find many Twins fans who wouldn't trade a bunch of gut-punch playoff losses to the Yankees for our one ring.
  7. 35thstreetswarm
    You know what they say, "don't fight the hypo." The poster cut it off at 2019 to make a rhetorical point about success sans championship being more satisfying than championship with fewer "successful" seasons overall. You might not like the way he set up the argument, but that's kind of a different point.
  8. 35thstreetswarm
    No, I suspect that's why he compared the Cubs run to the Dodgers through 2019, not 2020. The Dodgers didn't win a ring in that window.
  9. 35thstreetswarm
    I suspect the argument is that the cumulative joy of having been "in it" throughout multiple seasons adds up to more than the joy of winning it all one time. Don't agree, but that's it. Nobody would argue that, in a single season, it's more fun to lose early in the playoffs than win it all.
  10. 35thstreetswarm
    ...but the question was backward-looking, not forward looking. The original post said, even in retrospect, he'd take the sustained success with no titles over sporadic success with a ring.
  11. 35thstreetswarm
    Apparently DH'd in 80 out of 130 games last season, his first after a major knee injury. Seems to raise defensive questions similar to the Castellanos's/Ozunas of the world.
  12. 35thstreetswarm
    No way for me - flags fly forever. I take no joy looking back on seasons where my team got close but lost. I can summon pure joy from memories of the 2005 title run now and for the rest of my life. Now if we're talking about approaches going forward, I totally agree that sustained success is the way to go, rather than cashing in all chips for a short window. But that's because I think it's the best way to maximize the chance for a ring.
  13. 35thstreetswarm
    Exactly. This is a Sale-like return. If I trade Vaughn AND Kopech (and I don't want to), PLUS MORE, I better be getting a DeGrom caliber pitcher in return.
  14. 35thstreetswarm
    I think the issue may be that it's f***ing crazy, with all due respect. I'm not worried about how big of a question mark Tampa thinks Kopech is. This would be a massive overpay.
  15. 35thstreetswarm
    Man, Sox Twitter is full of arguments this week in response to that graphic from MLBtv suggesting Vaughn + Kopech + Stiever (yes, that's our #1 hitting prospect, #1 pitching prospect, PLUS another MLB-ready arm) for Snell...with the majority seeming to like it! Makes me happy to spend my time here with you folks.
  16. 35thstreetswarm
    Well that's...good, I guess? But what about the tweet itself? Hoping it's about the coaching staff, but seems a little ominous.
  17. 35thstreetswarm
    What's going on with TA's Twitter? "They shook it up. Kinda wasn't feeling it." Has no White Sox-related images or information at all. Is this TLR-related? Sorry, can't embed tweet from work, someone else can if they care to.
  18. 35thstreetswarm
    Almost certainly.
  19. 35thstreetswarm
    Wtf is the “miracle mile”? ?
  20. 35thstreetswarm
    Even if you accept Lynn as a TOR starter, what number 5 starters are getting 16 mil/year plus? I see guys who teams probably project as 2/3s (Stroman, Morton) getting that much, not 5s.
  21. 35thstreetswarm
    Really only 2 if you believe Vaughn will help this season, as I do.
  22. 35thstreetswarm
    Same. We're in the enviable position of having a complete enough roster to be able to act with "win-now" urgency AND protect our assets -- that's because we a) don't have that many holes to fill; and b) have money to spend on free agents. (And those free agents don't even have to be Bauer and Springer.) Let's not force tough decisions on ourselves when we don't need to.
  23. 35thstreetswarm
    Agreed. Plenty of teams that turn out to be contenders are not obvious, consensus contenders before their first contending season--last year's Rays being the most recent example. I wouldn't bet my house on 2021 being the best year of the Sox window, but it wouldn't shock me if that turned out to be the case. Since we keep talking about the Cubs, it would have seemed ridiculous to suggest in November of 2014 that the Cubs would have a better shot at a title in 2015 than they would in, say, 2018. But they did.
  24. 35thstreetswarm
    See, I take a slightly different lesson from the Cubs. Whether they had their core “locked up” at the time or not, they basically kept it together and still declined faster than most predicted. Hell, they’re talking about non-tendering their MVP centerpiece five years after fighting for an extra season of control. Just because we’ll have our core together in, say, 2024 doesn’t mean we’ll be good then.
  25. 35thstreetswarm
    Precisely. The time for punting whole seasons is long gone. You can’t predict in advance which part of your window will give you the best shot. Every season is precious now. That being said, I’m dead against depleting our hard-won assets to fill holes that could just as easily be filled through free agency, especially when we have plenty to spend. I think that’s where we are this offseason.
×
×
  • Create New...