35thstreetswarm

I think it's probably fine, too. We're stuck in a bad situation facing an innings limit because he sat out last year. This seems like a reasonable way to deal with that while maximizing the chance that he can help us down the stretch. Maybe stretching him out as a starter and shutting him down in August, ala Strasburg a few years back, would be best for his development (though I have my doubts,) but *nobody* would be happy with that if he has a solid year and we're in contention.

I predict Ricketts will become public enemy #1 over the next few years (though probably not for this ^) as the Cubs continue to bleed members of their core and the team slides. An already unlikeable owner shielded for the last few years by the team's success is going to be thrust into the harsh light of post-"dynasty" media scrutiny.

Clearly it was antifa.

Damn that's a pretty good back end of a batting order.

This is a really good point and post. But I think the fans who care about this kind of thing are a minority of the fanbase: a smaller one than folks like us who post on baseball message boards realize. Moneyball heroics doesn't put butts in seats - to the contrary.

Call him in to DraftKings

Down to +2000 now. You jumped on it at the right time!

Really going out on a limb there. ? He’s really one of only a handful of athletes I’ve ever watched who commands instant double takes, who just seems “built different.” If he can avoid injury and keep his head in the game I am giddy to see what he can turn into.

I’ve long had a weird feeling Adolfo would break out in a huge way when we least expect it. Hopefully it’s this year.

Anybody have any insight into when the tickets might go on sale?

But it is a certainty! Why can't you see it? Are you unable to see, or just insane? Either way, you are avoiding the point. And proving his argument. Which means you can't have an intelligent argument without avoiding the point or proving his argument. Which proves he's right. Why can't you see it? Why why why? Well, congratulations on proving his point. He's done with you, he has other, more serious arguments to attend to. That about does it, right? Saved you (and us) four or five repetitive posts of steadily increasing length and vitriol (all *Edited* -- because damnit, that last one could've been *more* off-putting). Back to baseball, yes?

Well, if the Sox succeed this season you can add them to this list. Let’s hold off on writing our epitaphs for this team as their window is just opening. Perhaps we let it play out.

Yeah, I think he specializes in that painting-on-a-grain-of-rice trick. And I hear he can build a ship in a bottle...from the inside.

I do wish RH would fly above this kind of stuff. Leave the puzzling, gratuitous anti-fan aggression to Stone, Jerry and Co.

Imagine that - using 2021 rosters to predict 2021 results! This is the point I was making when I mentioned the Padres in the thread above. For reasons too obvious to require explanation, it's absurd to penalize this year's roster for the performance of different White Sox rosters of the past (many of which were designed to lose during recent tank seasons). It's especially ridiculous when you're willing to judge teams like the Padres solely by their current roster and ignore their even more established history of futility.

You're talking about a completely different point.

That's got some interesting stuff, hadn't read that before. It's heavy on the post-trade period, and I take it all with a grain of salt given that it's from the mouths of Padres scouts who have a vested interest in making themselves sound good. But still, sounds like despite not pursuing him hard in 2015, the Padres did target him specifically in '16.

I think the bottom line is we'd have to know more about the Padres' scouting of Tatis, and their decisionmaking process in that trade, to be able to evaluate how much was scouting and how much was luck. It's possible they had him pegged as a star and couldn't believe their luck when we were stupid enough to trade him. It's possible they basically picked his name out of a hat, thought no more of him than we did, and were as shocked as we were when they saw what they had. It's possible they were at any number of points on the spectrum between those extremes. I don't know enough to know, but I think it's fair to say there was a substantial element of "surprise" in Tatis's outperformance of his perceived value as of 2016.

I think they thought he was BPA. Lots of folks at the time hyped him as the best/smartest college player they'd ever seen. I don't think they drafted based on need - IIRC Moncada was still thought of as our primary 2b at the time, and it's not like our outfield was "full." He was above Kelenic in every mock I saw.

Then again, how does having Tatis impact other moves the FO has made since? I play this game all the time with Tatis, with the hypothetical world where we signed Machado, etc. For example, does this frugal front office "splurge" on Robert if it has Tatis in the fold? Would they have set their sights on some other free agent rather than Machado given the crowded future infield? Maybe they'd have entertained trade proposals for Anderson? I'm not saying the Tatis move wasn't a huge error, but you can't just plug him into the current lineup like nothing else would've changed - anybody who's watched the "Back to the Future" trilogy knows that.

Who knows, but I don't think we need to expect that outcome necessarily -- from my understanding long-lasting symptoms were the exception, not the rule, for someone his age. Multiple young people in my family have now had COVID and none had any symptoms that lasted more than a few days.

I love it, actually. Too lazy to do the math on the innings, but with the number of times the fifth starter is skipped I suspect it would work out.

Come on, Beebs fans are in their 20s and 30s now, boomer ?

Sounds good to me. Plus, Where Would [Anderson] Play? ?

Yes. Who knows, Cease may be too before too long.