caulfield12

Perhaps not being 3rd in the majors in errors and 5th in unearned runs would help as well. I can't remember where I saw something recently about how the White Sox are infamous for making it easier for their hitters to bunt down the lines (since we haven't had any really good bunters since Guillen and Karkovice)...just thought it was funny in this day and age for someone to bring it up like it actually gave the Sox an advantage over the last 20 years or so. For groundskeeper Gene Bossard, lending the Chicago White Sox an underhanded hand was the family business. Gene managed the turf at Comiskey Park from 1940 to 1983, and when he stepped down, his son Roger took over operations. Together, the Bossards were known for doctoring and dampening the diamond to give the Sox a true home field advantage. In fact, opposing teams took to calling the infield "Bossard's Swamp," because Gene kept it watered down to benefit the Sox's sinkerball pitchers and to slow opposing baserunners. Bossard's most infamous trick, however, seems to be inventing the "frozen baseball." Perhaps Roger Bossard explained the phenomenon best: "In the bowels of the old stadium my dad had an old room where the humidifier was constantly going. By leaving the balls in that room for 10 to 14 days, they became a quarter- to a half-ounce heavier." The Sox manager during the frozen ball era in the late 1960s? Number 7 on this list, Eddie Stanky. neatorama.com

White Sox 3rd in the majors in errors and 5th in unearned runs surrendered.

It would also help if Adam Eaton looked like the 2012 version and not the 2013/14 one.

QUOTE (Buehrle>Wood @ Jun 2, 2014 -> 10:21 PM) Well let's hope he didn't catch the yips Between DeAza, Beckham and Lindstrom's injury, our pre-season trade targets aren't doing so hot at the moment. Then you have Belisario not exactly locking down the closer's role, which shouldn't be a surprise, but it's certainly not helping his trade value, either. Beckham's worth SOMETHING still, but it was supposed to be for his defense.

QUOTE (onedude @ Jun 2, 2014 -> 10:19 PM) Has a position player been benched in the middle of an inning before? Wtf Beckham? ? I'm trying to remember if that happened with either Lillibridge or Rios. Maybe...once?

QUOTE (flavum @ Jun 2, 2014 -> 10:17 PM) This game has the potential of being a "beginning of the end" game. I hope it's not. Thought that would be the Danks/Belisario Yankees game. Surprised they've hung so tough without Abreu...up until that inning at least.

Beckham made ANOTHER ERROR? You're kidding, right? He has essentially made 3 errors in one plus inning now. Shades of Steve Sax/Chuck Knoblauch here.

At least Ventura had the sense to remove Quintana after that disastrous inning and not make him go out there again.

White Sox now have the 3rd most errors in MLB after CLE and Washington. Except for Alexei Ramirez and Eaton, not much of an improvement at all on last year's terrible season...and Eaton can't throw consistently.

QUOTE (chitownsportsfan @ Jun 2, 2014 -> 07:25 PM) I think it means the Sox see Semien as a super sub with a bat (say: 270/330/400) that you could squint hard and say "ok, if someone gets injured 30 games of this guy in left won't kill us". I dunno, it's arguable that he has 3 more talented players ahead of him already on the 25 man (Conor, Alexei, Gordo) and 2 players more talented than him (Micah and Sanchez) in AAA and the Sox see his future as a super sub. 300 PA a year as a guy that can cover 2B,3B and the Corners is a nice piece, especially at min salary. edit: not to jinx it, but this is the first time in recent memory the Sox actually have enough talented position infield players to where you actually have to feel a bit bad about someone getting sent down. I think it's way too premature to make any observations or comparisons with the latter two...let alone Gillaspie and Beckham, based mostly on the last 2 months.

However, if you put Beane in Chicago, where he would have significant revenue advantages, getting to the playoffs more often would provide him a significant amount of payroll leeway to fix whatever holes they have. Same with Friedman of the Rays. We'll probably never know the answer to how he/they would do with the White Sox. We do, on the other hand, have a pretty good idea what will happen when you have PEDs testing and the inability to spend $175 million or so every season like the Red Sox/Epstein. Mistakes like JD Drew, Julio Lugo, Edgar Renteria, Carl Crawford, Dice-K, Beckett or Lackey weren't automatic death sentences like the Edwin Jackson one. The Red Sox won two World Series during his tenure, but those are achievements that will largely be associated with those year's players and the now departed Terry Francona. Epstein's legacy is far more mixed. He's leaving a mess behind him as he leaves Fenway for Wrigley. Theo will be remembered for his gutsy trading of Nomar and his wooing of Curt Schilling. He'll be remembered as the guy who drafted Dustin Pedroia and Jacoby Ellsbury. But he'll also be the guy linked to a litany of poor free-agency decisions. Did any one tell Theo that the Cubs are plain terrible? He's going to have his work cut out for him in Chicago. If the local boy really wanted to do good, he would not have left. And certainly not now. As it is, few are complaining that he's gone. bleacherreport.com

QUOTE (ptatc @ Jun 2, 2014 -> 06:26 PM) The problem with this is that the theory is based on a player using the averages such as OBP to be succeesful. This works in the regular season where you get to face average or below average pitchers. This type of player has less of a chance in the playoffs against good to great pitchers which the playoff teams typically have. This is why they don't do as well in the playoffs. In a 7 game series the talent wins not playing the averages. Of course, going by the averages occasinally they do win. Right. The only way around this fact is simply to be so good at scouting and drafting/development that you can have 4-5 Josh Donaldson's on your team in their cost-controlled years. Those early 2000's A's teams had the pitching (Mulder/Zito/Hudson) but not quite enough clutch hitting, despite the presence of Giambi, Eric Chavez, Damon, Dye and perennial-MVP candidate Miguel Tejada. Nick Swisher, later on. Part of it was freaky bad luck, or just talent, or however you want to describe it...the Jeter/Jeremy Giambi play at the plate, for example. It's also a bit ironic that those A's and Twins teams of that era, the only team they could beat was each other in the playoffs.

QUOTE (Charlie Haeger's Knuckles @ Jun 2, 2014 -> 06:26 PM) f***ing release/fire whoever threw the ball. With the way the White Sox season has gone so far, that would have us releasing Alexei, arguably our co-MVP so far this year.

QUOTE (chitownsportsfan @ Jun 2, 2014 -> 06:04 PM) Oh yea Marte. Also while doing some research for this thread I ran across the name: Mike MacDougal. Also, Nick Massett was a thing for a minute. Coop can't fix'em all -- but overall the Sox have acquired so much low cost above replacement pitching it's kept them afloat and papered over a really bad position player development history. There were actually four guys with differing pedigrees (and potentially-dominant stuff) who "failed" with the White Sox at right around the same time (2007-2008)... Aardsma, MacDougal, Massett and Sisco

QUOTE (chitownsportsfan @ Jun 2, 2014 -> 05:38 PM) Thornton, Sale, Contreras, Hector, Santos, Jenks, Jones, Edwin Jackson off the top of my head. Jackson was actually pretty damn good his season under Cooper then went back to being the exact same guy after he left. Jackson had one really solid season for the Tigers before tapering off and he has been "decent" this year with the Cubs, but he probably owes Cooper about 1/3rd of that deal Epstein gave him. As far as Nate Jones goes, the jury is still out. Another name you could add to the list would be Damaso Marte, FWIW.

QUOTE (chitownsportsfan @ Jun 2, 2014 -> 05:26 PM) I certainly think that you have to have a philosophy as an organization about the type of player you think you can work with and those that you can't. Chicago seemingly just realized they can't take every toolsy football player and teach him baseball. On the flip side, taking hard throwers and turning them into pitchers -- they've had a lot of success there. Agree that you have to give yourself a bunch of lotto tickets and the Sox are doing better with that by signing the latin guys. Only 1 in 20 might pan out but if you strike a superstar on that 1 guy it's totally worth it. In a way, that's what they've been trying to do with all the toolsy outfielders they've drafted but you have to wonder if the Sox are doing something wrong wrt to player development if none of those guys pans out -- certainly Hawkins will be a litmus test. I mean look at the Royals, those guys make the Sox' track record on position player development look downright Bean esque. They had the top rated farm system for seemingly half a decade and hardly any of those guys developed. Examples? I assume you're talking about pitchers we've brought in from other organizations, moreso than the pitchers the White Sox have drafted over the Don Cooper years. Jenks and Santos, Floyd, Danks (pre-surgery), Contreras, Sale? Santiago? (Certainly hasn't worked with Paulino or Cleto). Our biggest success story of the last five years is Quintana, who profiles more like an A's pitching find, even though he does throw 92-93, which is very solid for a lefty.

QUOTE (chitownsportsfan @ Jun 2, 2014 -> 05:15 PM) eh, if it was so easy everyone would do it. Donaldson is like an 7-8 WAR player, that's a pretty f***ing good foundation. Basically it comes down to "find really good players". I mean, giving Donaldson 160 some PA before he went "poof, 8 war player" is some sort of guide? I RTFA and I just don't see it, so much of this stuff is just hindsight bias. The A's are really good at finding guys good at baseball. That's a combination of scouting, sabermetrics and luck, with luck being perhaps the most important -- see every playoff series since Beane took over. His s*** doesn't work in the playoffs, and most team's s*** doesn't work in teh regular season without a good deal of luck. Especially when you're working on the margins as a mid to small market team. Still, the theories are correct, especially for a small market team with limited revenues. We can say the same thing about the Atlanta Braves, and yet who wouldn't want to experience their level of success all those seasons? In order to get to the World Series and win it, you have to put yourself in playoff position on a consistent basis (see Detroit Tigers). PLUS, we just had absolutely EVERYTHING go our way in 2005, it's not nearly as easy as we made it look that year...not even so easy to get back to the playoffs for the White Sox, let alone making it 2 of 3 years or 3 of 4.

QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Jun 2, 2014 -> 05:17 PM) Traded, I might add, as a low level minor league throw in from the Cubs in the Rich Harden deal. That is one I think is important. When you trade away guys, steal some lottery tickets from a team's lowest minor league levels. Or ones that are "stuck" (due to injuries or non-performance or veteran depth in front of them) at higher levels, like Quentin, Eaton, Garcia and Davidson...in the case of the White Sox, fans aren't going to be allow them to go through five long years of searching for solutions like the A's went through, even though they never bottomed out and lost more than 90 games in any season. Don't buy into the idea of rebuilding or starting over. Always fight and compete each season.

http://www.nbcsports.com/baseball/mlb/oakland-way Great article, long, but as always with Posnanski, worth reading. 1) They don't invest in toolsy outfielders who strike out way too many times compared to their walk rates...they have brought in players like Cespedes, Crisp and Gentry at the major league level with lots of athleticism, but they don't try to make athletes into ballplayers as a consistent drafting/development philosophy. 2) They aren't afraid to use platoons and make back-up plans, even when those guys are hitting as well as Moss (see the trade for Kyle Blanks example) this season. 3) With pitching, target strikethrowers and "outs getters" more than being overly concerned with radar guns and K's, especially in stadiums with lots of foul territory and dead fog nights where the ball doesn't carry. That would lead to the White Sox taking either Aiken or Nola over the likes of Rodon/Kolek. It might also have something to do with what's going on with Beck and Danish. See examples of Kazmir and Millone, who throws the same velocity-wise as Buehrle and Chen. Pitch movement/effectiveness, etc. "I would say there are three or four things that we concentrate on when it comes to pitching," Zaidi says. He then lists off what he readily admits are relatively basic things that you will hear from most teams -- stuff like command and intelligence and a proven track record of performance (and building a strong defense that can help a pitcher prevent runs). He talks about the talent A's pitching coach Curt Young has for helping pitchers find effective ways of getting batters out. 4) Don't use the bullpen in conventional ways or follow the textbook...be imaginative (or the opposite of Ventura for much of his time in Chicago). Also, be willing to admit you're wrong with guys like Johnson and be willing to go with an untested Doolittle (and quickly). 5) The biggest lesson, perhaps...not getting discouraged with one or two failures at the major league level, but having longer-lasting confidence in their original assessments on players and their AA/AAA results (see Donaldson, Josh). Don't get too discouraged or give up too quickly on a Marcus Semien when he gets overmatched and has a lot of traits you like in his minor league statistics (pitch taking/working the count, OBP, low K/BB ratios, even to the point where there are more BB's than walks). 6) No matter how ugly a guy's scouting profile or lack of tools, does he get on base? Does he limit the number of outs he gives up to the opposition? The White Sox are 5th in the majors in runs scored and 15th in OBP (.319). Meanwhile, Oakland is first (.340). 7) Keep trying to figure out ways to improve the defensive metrics...a long ways to go in that area. Control runs allowed. 8) Core of position players getting 60-65% of your at-bats or more in the 25-31 age range. CHECK.

Yes, positive results are possible, but I don’t say they’re probable. For one thing, we have a remarkably poor record in this country of seizing the opportunities that follow spectacular crimes of this sort. After the Aurora and Newtown shootings, there appeared to be a window for some modest degree of national gun regulation, perhaps a federal ban on military-style assault weapons and high-capacity ammo clips. But in case you hadn’t noticed, our political system is paralyzed and dysfunctional, and the party with a House majority is held hostage by weapons manufacturers and a fanatical core of Second Amendment truthers. So that went nowhere, because Thomas Jefferson’s vision of the republic’s future evidently involved a lot of fat white guys in camo vests stockpiling action-movie arsenals. (The good news about the Obama-era explosion in gun ownership is that it hasn’t altered the general downward trend in crime. The bad news is that it probably means that the people who already had guns have bought more of them.) But that’s not actually my subject here, although we should stipulate that reasonable restrictions on firearm ownership would go a long way toward reducing the frequency, the body count and the media-friendly spectacle of incidents like the Isla Vista killings. Now, Elliot Rodger would presumably have been just as disturbed on the subject of male-female relations if he’d lived in England or Germany or any of the other major Western countries where it’s much more difficult to acquire guns (which would be, let’s see, all of them). What troubles me is the extent to which many men seek to ignore or deflect all conversation about the specific nature of Elliot Rodger’s pathology, along with the evident fact that many women see that pathology as a ubiquitous social and cultural problem. It’s one thing to conclude that access to guns and inadequate mental-health treatment were the most important factors in the toxic equation that fueled Rodger’s rampage, and that misogynistic ranting was the form of his crazy but not the substance. I don’t find that entirely persuasive, but it’s a reasonable position in itself. What I’ve encountered over and over again this past week on Twitter and comments forums and message boards is that opinion used as a weapon, angrily presented as an incontrovertible fact that should put an end to all this hysterical and irresponsible lady-talk. It’s a window-slammer, meant to terminate a conversation that threatens to stray into uncomfortable questions about misogyny, male entitlement and masculine identity. It’s another way of telling the girls to shut up. And fellas, we’ve done quite enough of that. http://www.salon.com/2014/05/31/elliot_rod..._point_for_men/

Rick Ankiel completely lost the strike zone, but it wasn't due to losing velocity. Not sure how much of this situation is physical and how much of it's psychological, but it seems the physical problems are leading to psychological ones in this case as he's going steadily downhill/backwards.

QUOTE (Lemon_44 @ Jun 2, 2014 -> 04:49 AM) Now may be a good time to buy low on Dominic Brown. He's young lefthanded and has some power. Besides, he couldn't be any worse than running DeAza out there everyday. I'm not saying Alexei in a deal for him but you may be able to get him cheap. He's still young enough to turn it around and a change of scenery could help. Since they already have Rollins, they're not going to displace him for another veteran in Ramirez. So what young player do we have with any real upside that a team in transition/going into rebuilding would actually want that we don't? They might accept Viciedo for Brown, who's well under 600 OPS-wise at the moment. The irony is I'm pretty sure both guys are represented by Boras, which means you're essentially renting him, but we would have Brown under contract from 2015-2017, which is our hoped-for contention window (along with 2018). It would be an interesting trade for both teams. Brown gives the White Sox left-handed pop and he's a better fielder than Viciedo, but he has looked terrible this season. Viciedo has been very good until recently, but his future is also a bit cloudy in Chicago.

QUOTE (Lemon_44 @ Jun 2, 2014 -> 04:49 AM) Now may be a good time to buy low on Dominic Brown. He's young lefthanded and has some power. Besides, he couldn't be any worse than running DeAza out there everyday. I'm not saying Alexei in a deal for him but you may be able to get him cheap. He's still young enough to turn it around and a change of scenery could help. Since they already have Rollins, they're not going to displace him for another veteran in Ramirez. So what young player do we have with any real upside that a team in transition/going into rebuilding would actually want that we don't? They might accept Viciedo for Brown, who's well under 600 OPS-wise at the moment. The irony is I'm pretty sure both guys are represented by Boras, which means you're essentially renting him, but we would have Brown under contract from 2015-2017, which is our hoped-for contention window (along with 2018). It would be an interesting trade for both teams. Brown gives the White Sox left-handed pop and he's a better fielder than Viciedo, but he has looked terrible this season. Viciedo has been very good until recently, but his future is also a bit uncertain in Chicago.

QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ Jun 1, 2014 -> 09:48 PM) Nice. Bobby Abreu can f***ing hit Jose?

Unless the organization believes BOTH Semien and Sanchez are slated to be utility players in the Keppinger/McEwing/Oquendo/Grebeck mode long-term, they need to pick the best one (in their belief) and stick him at SS everyday. Saladino's no longer a prospect for everyday MLB time, so he will be the first one (and has been) to be moved all over the field. And Sanchez/Micah Johnson both can't play 2B at the same time, either.