Everything posted by chw42
-
2014-2015 NFL Football thread
QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Mar 12, 2014 -> 01:59 PM) @RapSheet: The #Bucs deal for Josh McCown: It’s two years for $10M. He gets $4.75M this year, $5.25M next year. Wow.
-
2014-2015 NFL Football thread
QUOTE (bmags @ Mar 12, 2014 -> 01:43 PM) Re: MD Jennings, I think it is reassuring to think that we basically needed 2 deep at every position this year, so not every signing is going to be a starter. He'd be fine as a backup. Just not a backup to Conte.
-
2014-2015 NFL Football thread
QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Mar 12, 2014 -> 01:39 PM) There are a few ways to look at losing McNown. The fact that he pretty much sucked before last year, so maybe the offense makes the QB and not the other way around, so it would make sense they can get a fill in just as good. Or maybe he was just fantastic last year and somehow found himself. Or maybe he was fantastic last year but it was a fluke and had he have stayed, his play would have dropped off to where he had been. 2 out of 3 are in the Bears favor, and they are the 2 that are most likely. You have to be happy for him though. He gets millions for a career that he probably figured was over a couple of years ago. He's not going to be very good in TB. The system and weapons he had made him the QB he was last year. He'll be back to a 70-80 rating QB with the Bucs.
-
NBA Thread 2013-2014
QUOTE (Brian @ Mar 12, 2014 -> 07:23 AM) Too bad because this is the first basketball league I've done with that type of scoring and I like it. I honestly don't like category scoring. This kind of scoring makes you get efficient players (since it's pretty much un-adjusted PER), but doesn't force you to build a well-rounded team like you'd have to do in categories. It's also a lot easier to see who's valuable and who isn't. I had to get a few new people this year because the guy who won the league last year left (he thought it was too boring).
-
2014-2015 NFL Football thread
QUOTE (scs787 @ Mar 11, 2014 -> 09:36 PM) Adam Schefter @AdamSchefter 52s While Denver focuses on DeMarcus Ware…Vikings free-agent DE Jared Allen is talking with the Bears and Seattle Seahawks, per league source. I'm intrigued. Though competing with Seattle gives me doubts. I would love to get Jared Allen. He's still pretty productive.
-
NBA Thread 2013-2014
QUOTE (Brian @ Mar 11, 2014 -> 11:26 AM) White Mamba? I'm one of the few that update. I run the league. It's hard to get 10 devoted people to play in a free fantasy basketball league.
-
2014-2015 NFL Football thread
QUOTE (Chisoxfn @ Mar 11, 2014 -> 04:42 PM) Adam Schefter @AdamSchefter 4m Bears have agreed to terms with S Ryan Mundy on a two-year contract, team announced. Nice, Mundy's decent.
-
NBA Thread 2013-2014
QUOTE (Jake @ Mar 9, 2014 -> 11:57 PM) Lance Stephenson plays like that guy that joins your pickup game, says he hasn't played basketball in 10 years, and just makes lucky shot after lucky shot And you know he's like that because he'll brick a few shots really badly in between.
-
NBA Thread 2013-2014
What a game for Jo. 13/12/14.
-
Official 2013-2014 College Hoops Thread
QUOTE (Jenksismyb**** @ Mar 1, 2014 -> 05:17 PM) So win out, win a game or two in the tourney, dare we say NCAA berth Beating three straight ranked teams to end it would definitely strengthen our chances. I still don't like the odds though.
-
NBA Thread 2013-2014
QUOTE (lasttriptotulsa @ Feb 28, 2014 -> 09:42 AM) Sources say Bulls close to signing Fredette. Jimmer can definitely shoot and the Bulls need that. He can be a quick jolt off the bench when the Bulls go into those horrible dry spells on offense. It looks like the Bulls are probably going to grab the 3rd seed. They definitely won't get passed the Eastern Semis, but maybe they'll be entertaining again in the playoffs.
-
2014-2015 NFL Football thread
QUOTE (ptatc @ Feb 27, 2014 -> 09:15 AM) Players are used to racists in locker rooms. Players are not used to gay players in locker rooms. It's all about player comfort levels. They are?
-
Slow pitch softball thread
I'm definitely getting a Demarini J3 now. Hit a HR opposite field with almost no effort. Amazing bat.
-
Technology catch-all thread
QUOTE (Y2HH @ Feb 24, 2014 -> 07:42 PM) That's just something that doesn't concern me, as I've had every iPhone since the start and have never broken one of them, despite not using a case. They're phones not hammers, don't be careless with them. I don't throw my expensive watch around, either...it's not a baseball, it's a delicate instrument and though made to withstand some punishment, the wrong drop at the wrong angle can destroy it, so it should be treated as such. If a shatterproof phone is what you need, they make them, and they're huge ugly monstrosities. Oh, I don't throw rubber balls at my plasma tvs, either, because they'll shatter. That being said, IF that's such a concern to you, buy the insurance which is available for any device you buy and then you can shatter them at will. I personally have never broken a phone due to clumsiness. I've come close (dropped my uncle's iPhone 4 from about chest high straight onto hard flooring and it somehow survived) though. However, you can't account for situations you just can't control sometimes. In those cases, I'd rather have a phone that's less likely to break if I do drop it. I use cases though, so usually that's not an issue. I've dropped my Nexus 5 with the case on a few times and it's still in perfect condition.
-
Technology catch-all thread
QUOTE (Y2HH @ Feb 24, 2014 -> 07:02 PM) We agree on that, I think a flagship phone needs to be made of some sort of metal/alloy these days, I'm not a huge fan of plastic stuff at these prices. But that'd still be incremental. It doesn't even need to be like the HTC One. Sony's phones are absolutely gorgeous (see new Z2), although I don't know how shatter-proof they are.
-
Technology catch-all thread
QUOTE (Y2HH @ Feb 24, 2014 -> 06:45 PM) In Samsungs defense (I can't believe you have me defending Samsung here), the smartphone market is technologically mature now, and there isn't much other than incremental updates to add/tweak at this point. It's not unlike what the desktop market became over the years, where a bit more speed was the only real differentiator. Until a battery breakthrough is made, which is an obvious improvement, or a yet unknown and much less obvious idea emerges, there isn't much they can really do at this point. If people thought the S4 was a bad incremental update, then this is a far worse incremental update. I think the best thing Samsung could have done was improve the build quality of the phone. I don't think that requires anything groundbreaking to do. But they really didn't manage to do that. Instead, they made a phone with a slightly better feeling back that's bigger than the previous iteration in every way.
-
Technology catch-all thread
QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Feb 24, 2014 -> 02:42 PM) I came to this thread wondering if anyone had commented on it. I take a lot from the fact this was the only comment I see. Samsung's getting pretty complacent.
-
Technology catch-all thread
QUOTE (Jake @ Feb 24, 2014 -> 02:46 PM) It's good and they at least tried to do something about crap build materials. I'm glad they didn't add resolution as that s*** is getting out of hand and is a major battery suck. There had been a rumor that this might come in at a lower price than most flagship phones as carriers are applying pressure to OEMs to make phones affordable for non-contract purchasing (who thought we'd ever hear this? thanks T-Mobile!) I'm sort of disappointed that these two early flagships (HTC One and S5) are going to use the Snapdragon 800 and not the 805. And yeah, I really didn't see the point of a 1440p display on a 5 inch display. They did good getting rid of that awful glossy plastic, but the phone is heavier, bigger, and thicker than the S4. That's a step back IMO.
-
Slow pitch softball thread
QUOTE (RockRaines @ Feb 24, 2014 -> 09:46 AM) I use a wood bat since I play mostly 16in. I use a 34 or 36 oz. Jesus Christ that's heavy.
-
Slow pitch softball thread
QUOTE (KyYlE23 @ Feb 24, 2014 -> 11:01 AM) There are a few Jeff Halls in our teams bat collection, those are also pretty fun to swing. Our teams best hitter plays with the local combat tourney team, so he has a few combats in his bag too. Personally for some reason I really like the two piece bats. Maybe it is how they are weighted, but they feel great when you hit the sweet spot. But they seem to fizzle out quicker than the one piece bats, and the sweet spot is smaller I really like the Z2000/3000s. Those and the J3 are the only two piece bats I like. My friend has a Combat Wanted, but I've never liked how end-loaded it is.
-
Technology catch-all thread
Samsung Galaxy S5 = MEH.
-
Slow pitch softball thread
QUOTE (KyYlE23 @ Feb 23, 2014 -> 10:20 PM) I'm a big fan of the Freak+ I don't think I've ever swung a Miken before. With the new ASA regulations, the new Combat bats are hot as hell, especially last year's Derby Boys. I just swung a Demarini J3 today, almost fresh out the wrapper and it felt amazing. I'm seriously thinking about dropping $250 on it right now.
-
Slow pitch softball thread
What bats do you guys swing?
-
2014 TV thread
QUOTE (Steve9347 @ Feb 21, 2014 -> 10:53 AM) Kevin Spacey and his group went around and proposed it to networks, HBO, Showtime, etc, and were declined. Then they went to Netflix and Hulu and Netflix wrote them a blank check for two seasons. He told that story on The Daily Show this week. I imagine it'd be hard for a major network to carry a show that's this dark and air it every week at 8 PM. They get to be a lot more explicit on Netflix and that's probably a good thing.
-
2014 TV thread
Netflix has incentive to release episodes every week as opposed to all at once. It keeps viewers interested and it keeps viewers subscribed longer. For all I know, a lot of people probably just get the one month trial and never subscribe afterwards. I do love binge viewing though.