Chicago White Sox

QUOTE (hi8is @ Nov 25, 2017 -> 07:19 PM) Coop + Herm * display history of success = good. Also interesting that he specifically asked for no financial aspects to be set forth. I don't know much about what Chicago has to offer when it comes to the cultural aspects requested. Still putting our odds at 1 in 1,000,000,000 That’s an absolutely huge selling point. No organization has done a better job of keeping pitchers healthy & productive than the White Sox and hopefully it’s not understated in their sales pitch.

QUOTE (bmags @ Nov 25, 2017 -> 08:45 AM) This is great and pretty much mine. I may remove Burr and add Sosa just because I wrote a long post on him so now I’m invested. I’ll be honest, I really struggled with those last four guys. There were probably a dozen or so up for consideration. I actually wanted to included Sosa, but haven’t found too much about him online and clearly there isn’t going to be much video either at this point. Do you mind bumping your post about him or sharing it in this thread? The fact that they brought him over so quickly hopefully speaks volume how the organization feels about him. And we definitely need some of these LatAm signings to start doing something, as my list only had one (excluding Robert) that was orginally signed by the Sox and that’s obviously not good.

QUOTE (CaliSoxFanViaSWside @ Nov 24, 2017 -> 11:31 PM) I don't think it happens either. Keep Abreu . Who knows how Moncada might react to losing a mentor and friend and after all it was Abreu who said Moncada should use a lighter bat. We all know how talented the kid is but I like his chances of being a star more with Abreu in his corner. I think this is part of it, but I also think we need some certainty in middle of our lineup. Jimenez is really the only prospect I feel confident about turning into that type of hitter at the moment and you’re putting a ton of pressure on him to carry the offense if we trade both Jose & Avi. Again, unless someone is offering a true blue chipper, which is doubtful given the amount of 1B options on the market, I’d try to sign Abreu to a reasonable four year extension. If he’s not game for that, I’d start marketing him much more intensely, but I see him as a guy who would like to stay with this team for the foreseeable future.

Tier 1 - 65/70 FV 1. Eloy Jimenez, OF 2. Michael Kopech, RHP Tier 2 - 60 FV 3. Luis Robert, OF 4. Alex Hansen, RHP Tier 3 - 50/55 FV 5. Zach Collins, C 6. Dane Dunning, RHP 7. Dylan Cease, RHP 8. Blake Rutherford, OF 9. Jake Burger, 3B Tier 4 - 45/50 FV 10. Micker Adolfo, OF 11. Carson Fulmer, RHP 12. Zach Burdi, RHP 13. Spencer Adams, RHP Tier 5 - 40/45 FV 14. Casey Gillaspie, 1B 15. Jordan Stephens, RHP 16. Gavin Sheets, 1B 17. Jordan Guerrero LHP 18. Thiago Vieira, RHP 19. Ryan Cordell, OF 20. Seby Zavala, C Tier 6 - 40 FV 21. Luis Alexander Basabe, OF 22. Ian Clarkin, LHP 23. Luis Gonzalez, OF 24. Bernardo Flores, LHP 25. Luis Corbelo, SS 26. Tyler Johnson, RHP 27. Jace Fry, LHP 28. Ryan Burr, RHP 29. Alex Call, OF 30. Justin Yurchak, 3B

I just don’t see the point of trading Abreu unless you get a legit blue-chipper for him. While you can certainly can never have enough prospect depth, at some point that depth comes with diminishing returns. We’re already starting to have 40 man roster issues, so adding more prospects will likely require us to let go of some other (lesser) talent down the road. Furthermore, you simply run out of opportunities to give these guys all looks. By the end of this coming season we could have a rotation of Rodon, Giolito, Lopez, Kopech, & Hansen plus guys like Adams, Stephens, & Guerrero (if around) in AAA and other key prospects like Dunning, Cease, etc. at other levels. Obviously we lack depth at other positions, but again, unless we’re adding a blue chipper I don’t see the point of selling Abreu, especially not when we’ll have plenty of money to plug any gaps with serviceable players. Avi is a different story because either you have to be confident in extending him for big money or sell him off in the next two years. Given our minor league OF dept (which is quite extensive) and Avi’s checkered past, I think selling is the right call. And while I would definitely not just give him away, I don’t need a blue chipper to move him like I would with Abreu.

QUOTE (hi8is @ Nov 22, 2017 -> 10:06 PM) Another aspect of Machado that hasn't been discussed ( to my knowledge ) is his character. The dude seems like a walking primadonna in the vein of ARod-lite. In most free agent and trade target related discussions, Kenny Williams and RH both have always seemed to place a high importance on these "intangible" items... like personality, character, and clubhouse leadership skills. I wonder if Manny brings up a red flag to the brass in our front office. This is a fair point. Character becomes much more important when you’re making a potential $300M+ investment. At the same time, there simply aren’t a lot superstars that become free agents at 26. I still think they go for him because outside of any character concerns he’d really be a perfect addition.

QUOTE (RockRaines @ Nov 22, 2017 -> 10:36 PM) FYI, I dont get the impression they are going to spend money this offseason, we are maybe a year away from that. Who said otherwise? The point of this thread was to talk about spending next year.

QUOTE (ChiliIrishHammock24 @ Nov 23, 2017 -> 12:14 AM) Let Rockstar take over. I want to be able to play as Jabba, fondling slave women all day, or fly around on my speeder bike, decapitating Ewoks with my light saber. Rockstar is printing money with GTA V, they’re not paying for a Star Wars license they don’t need to sell games. As for EA, I believe their licensing agreement runs another five years, so expect to be dissapointed with Star Wars games for a while. They even just decided to completely reboot a big story-centric Star Wars game that had been in development for multiple years because it was too “linear” and lacked games as a service characteristics. Developing a good single player Star Wars game should be a no brainer, but EA doesn’t appear to have much interest in delivering what fans actually want and will continue to push of flawed, micro-transaction fueled offerings like BF2.

Machado is going to get an opt-out, so I think contract length is less of a concern. Regardless, I don’t see him getting more than 10 years. Let’s say you pay him $35M/year with an opt-out after year 4. You basically need 16 WAR over his 26 to 29 year old seasons to break even. IMO, that seems like his floor and you could very well get 24 WAR over that period. The obvious risk with a Machado signing if he suddenly pulls a Heyward and now you’re stuck with an albatross contract for 10 years. But honestly, that seems like an incredibly unlikely outcome to me and we can’t be afraid to take small, calculated risks to add impact talent when we’ll have money to burn.

QUOTE (KyYlE23 @ Nov 21, 2017 -> 09:34 PM) 425 moons. So much left to do It’s wild how big this game is. I’m at like 550 moons and feel like there’s probably another 30 hours or so of content if I decide to 100% it. I actually decided to start CoD: WW2 last night as I needed a breather. Finding the last couple moons in each kingdom can be super tough at times.

QUOTE (BlackSox13 @ Nov 22, 2017 -> 04:11 PM) The Mariners are on the west coast, have traded for additional bonus pool $, have made an early offer to bring Iwakuma back to Seattle and are suspected to be interested in reuniting with Ichiro. Things could be lining up for Seattle. And that’s fine by me. Would rather have him end up in Seattle than with the Yankees or Dodgers or god forbid the Cubs.

Look, we probably have a 1/1000 chance of landing him, but the fact he’s turning down a potential $200M contract and coming over now means the typical rules don’t apply. This guy clearly wants that GOAT status. The Sox can legitimately provide him with an opportunity to be MLB’s first legit two-way player as well as being the focal point of a a very promising up-and-coming team. Not a lot of other organizations can truly offer that IMO.

QUOTE (shipps @ Nov 21, 2017 -> 02:38 PM) Jim Callis‏Verified account @jimcallisMLB Following Following @jimcallisMLB More Jim Callis Retweeted Jeff Beck My updated Top 10 farm systems: 1. @whitesox 2. @braves 3. @padres 4. @Phillies 5. @RaysBaseball 6. @Dodgers 7. @Athletics 8. @Yankees 9. @Brewers 10. @Reds This is amazing considering Moncada, Giolito, & Lopez are no longer eligible. We lost the #1 prospect in baseball plus two more top 50 guys and we’re still firmly at #1 and have the 4th overall pick in next year’s draft.

QUOTE (bmags @ Nov 21, 2017 -> 02:24 PM) Ha, well at least they got some benefit to it pre penalty. We got nothing from Wilder AND then had to start from scratch years later. Braves definitely came out in better shape than us. Just funny given how much serious/extensive it seems this offense was and yet we ultimately paid a bigger price. Obviouslg happy with the punishment here regardless. This type of behavior can not be tolerated or it will continue to foster.

QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Nov 21, 2017 -> 02:20 PM) Wow. So they are basically going to go 5 years without real international signings. Damn. So basically what we did after the Wilder fiasco

QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Nov 21, 2017 -> 01:36 PM) Honestly it is the last area I would look at. We have a pack of true relievers who throw in the high nineties or better in the system in Diaz, Burr, Burdi and Vieira. They also have lot of minor league starting pitchers who are doing the same, many of whom will absolutely fail to get the majors as a starter. The Sox do still have some live arms sitting on the 40 man roster as well who could round into a relief core. Plus with the year to year volatility of relievers, it is tough to justify eight figures a year for the good ones when you have so many plus arms in the system. I don’t think there is anything wrong with buying at least one elite reliever. Adding a guy like Kimbrel or Miller adds quite a bit of certainty to the back-end of the pen. With a young, developing staff I think that’s invaluable. Plus we should have millions upon millions to spend. Honestly, I pretty surprised at how conservative some of these plans are. The luxury of having a surplus of young, cost-controlled talent in place is you can spend a bit lavishly in free agency and go after the best / most dominant players. Elitr elievers shouldn’t be excluded from consideration IMO.

It would really suck the Yankees somehow landed him.

QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Nov 21, 2017 -> 01:43 PM) Joel Sherman‏Verified account @Joelsherman1 18m18 minutes ago Joel Sherman Retweeted MLB Trade Rumors If it matters, it is going to be more than 4 prospects made free This is good news. The more players made the available, the better chance we have of landing one for $300k.

QUOTE (Dam8610 @ Nov 21, 2017 -> 01:23 PM) Dom Nunez, Jason Martin, and some of the arms seem interesting. Not much beyond that, though. It's a group in which I could see Jordan Guerrero in the top 5. Yeah, Guerrero defintiely looks like one of the better prospects who will be available based on that list.

QUOTE (Buehrle>Wood @ Nov 21, 2017 -> 07:39 AM) http://www.gamerankings.com/browse.html 2 of the top 5 games of all time are on switch. If there's anyone still on the fence, I suggest getting off. IGN just did a top 25 best games on Switch and I think I own 18 of them. The vast majority of them are indie games, but just having Breath of the Wild, Mario Odyssey, Splatoon 2, & Mario Kart 8 Deluxe in the system’s first 8 months is more than reason enough to own the console.

QUOTE (steveno89 @ Nov 21, 2017 -> 10:48 AM) Hearing that all the prospects the Braves lose will be tossed back into the international free agent pool, subject to existing restrictions (likely we are out of the running to sign any of them) How much money do teams have left at this point? Depending on the number of players being tossed back into the pool, some guys may be forced to take $300k from the teams in the penalty box.

QUOTE (SoxPride18 @ Nov 21, 2017 -> 07:43 AM) Guerrero is the only one that bothers me that is not protected. I would of DFA'd May for him. No one is gonna take Polo and Peter is a utility player. Agree with this. Guerrero is pretty much our top left-handing pitching prospect plus is pretty close to major league ready. He may of faced long odds to earn a permanent spot in our rotation, but our bullpen is wide open right now, especially from the left side. I’m not overly concerned about Polo being selected and while I would have protected Peter, his upside is truly that of a utility player. And a guy like Jacob May is like 10th on the depth chart right now for OFs and has basically no chance of a snagging a long-term role. Right now we have three guys who will compete for the starting CF job in Garcia, Engel, & Tilson plus Cordell who might get some time there. May definitely doesn’t have the power to profile as corner OF, so what purpose does he really serve?

QUOTE (BlackSox13 @ Nov 21, 2017 -> 03:50 AM) I'll give the 2019 roster a shot. Won't be the sexiest but here goes. 1B Zach Collins 2B Yoan 3B Yolmer SS TA LF Ryan Cordell CF Leury RF Eloy C Seby Zavala DH Delmonico Bench: Narvaez, Saladino, Engel, May Rotation: Rodon, Kopech, Giolito, Lopez, Hansen. If Rodon is still having problems everyone moves up a slot with Dane Dunning moving into the 5th spot. Bullpen: Vieria, Burdi, Fulmer, Clark, Fry, D.Dunning. I think Abreu and Avi are gone by then be t I won't speculate as to the return. Also don't want to assume the Sox go after Manny Machado so I left him out of the mix. Plus, I think the Sox see Jake Burger as their future 3B and will have Yolmer continue to play 3B until Burger is ready. I think what could be even more interesting is forecasting the 2020 lineup when names such as Robert, Adolfo, Burger, Cease, Sheets, Rutherford, Basabe, Clarkin start coming into the picture. I just want to point out that the payroll for this proposed roster would be like $25M to $30M. You got plenty of room to add free agents even if you think Machado is an unrealistic target.

I don’t have a problem protecting guys like Clarkin & Basabe. However, not protecting Guerrero is pretty nuts to me when you look at some of the garbage on our 40 man roster. There’s at least four or five guys who could go and I wouldn’t bat an eye. If we end up non-tendering someone before the Rule 5 draft, can we then add someone like Guerrero or Polo and they will be protected? I guess I’m not certain how the rules work here.

QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Nov 20, 2017 -> 03:58 PM) Polo is by far the biggest surprise to me. Even if his bat isn't ready, he sounds like he would be able to play major league defense to me. The other two just aren't that surprising to me. Peter MIGHT be a utility guy if he can keep going. Guerrero has stalled at AA in an organization with a ton of pitching. Guerrero had terrific peripherals last year, so I’m not sure stalling is a fair description. Plus while we may have a lot of pitching, we ceraintly don’t have a surplus of left-handed pitching. I’m confident someone will draft him and stick him in their bullpen for a year. And it wouldn’t surprise me if he did well if used appropriately.