Everything posted by Flash Tizzle
-
B MAC
QUOTE(Kalapse @ May 30, 2005 -> 09:08 PM) Why is this happening? Can anyone give me one good reason for why s*** like this has been happening so often lately. I'm generalizing here-- it could be different from what i've observed, but I've noticed the rehasing of old topics is common among members who've been here for awhile, don't post often, and usually browse just as infrequently. Who knows, perhaps they're impatient and unwilling to search for similar threads. Nothing against anyone who may do this. This honestly doesn't bother me. But you were looking for an explanation, and I provide answers for fellow chatroom members.
-
Peter Gammons Says
QUOTE(SoxFan101 @ May 30, 2005 -> 07:06 PM) and KC isnt really much worse than the A's hell they might be better until they trade Sweeney... they have had a lot of 1 run losses. How dare you suggest Kansas City may be better than Oakland.A'S HAVE SECURED THEIR FUTURE WITH STUD PITCHING PROSPECTS!!! "I can trade whomever I desire and my disciples will continue to worship me. Our current record is merely the result of bad luck. I've inserted individual career statistics and minor league pitching projections into my computer and it suggested our record will be 85-77. So obviously, we're due to folow this record." /daily Oakland jab completed
-
SOX vs. Angels 5-30-05
THIS IS THE WORST THING THAT COULD HAPPEN TO THIS CLUB. Now Ozzie will have an excuse to keep OMIT TIMO on the roster.
-
SOX vs. Angels 5-30-05
I recall another matchup Jurassic had against Shields where he couldn't make contact with fastballs right down the middle.
-
SOX vs. Angels 5-30-05
Two on, 0 outs. I'm still very disappointed, whether or not they rally, with our managing, defense, putrid offense this afternoon.
-
SOX vs. Angels 5-30-05
When not popping up or otherwise disgracing our club, he steals stolen bases from teammates. It's not his choosing, but whenever Crede bats, EVERYTHING goes awry on that field for our club.
-
SOX vs. Angels 5-30-05
ARE YOU f***ING KIDDING ME??? Jesus Christ, we're losing this game.
-
SOX vs. Angels 5-30-05
You just knew this inning wouldn't be easy. Ozzie removed Mark three batters too late. He NEVER should have started this inning. I don't trust Marte in this situation, either. Hermanson should be in this game NOW.
-
SOX vs. Angels 5-30-05
QUOTE(KevHead0881 @ May 30, 2005 -> 04:24 PM) Why? Buehrle's pitched well and his pitch count is still good. -4th time through the lineup for Angel hitters. -Last few innings, there have been 5 or 6 hard hit outs. His outting has been far from dominating. 1 out, runner on 1st, but it's still far from over.
-
SOX vs. Angels 5-30-05
QUOTE(fathom @ May 30, 2005 -> 04:22 PM) Buehrle still in the game. Molina has looked good at the plate vs him today. And this is the result--basehit. How did I predict this would happen? It's not really even a prediction anymore. More like a fact.
-
SOX vs. Angels 5-30-05
Whoever pitches the 9th, I believe it's a guarantee the Angels won't go down 1-2-3. Never happens during these close games. NEVER.
-
SOX vs. Angels 5-30-05
QUOTE(Brian @ May 30, 2005 -> 04:13 PM) I don't think I would mind either scenerio, Buehrle starting it with Dustin ready or Dustin starting it. If Buehlre starts the inning, he must be immediately removed if any runners reach base. If Buehlre gives up a HR either that ties the game or gives Angels the lead, you have to leave him in. Personally, I'm bringing in Hermanson for the 9th.
-
SOX vs. Angels 5-30-05
QUOTE(KevHead0881 @ May 30, 2005 -> 04:10 PM) I meant the excuse DJ made for pulling Frank. Yeah, DJ, as if the ball disappears any less against OMIT TIMO.
-
SOX vs. Angels 5-30-05
QUOTE(winninguglyin83 @ May 30, 2005 -> 04:09 PM) Molina, rivera, molina. who gets the ninth? Buehrle or Hermie? Make your call. I say Hermie. Again, Hermanson. Angels have hit Mark hard these last few innings. Long, deep flies.
-
SOX vs. Angels 5-30-05
QUOTE(fathom @ May 30, 2005 -> 04:05 PM) That was close, I thought it had a chance to get out. Marte should be in to face Anderson here. Buehlre luckily escaped this inning. Regardless of pitch count, Buehrle should not begin the 9th inning. 4th time around for these Angels, who have taken their hacks against Mark, spells trouble.
-
SOX vs. Angels 5-30-05
This matchup is bad. Politte should be in this game now. EDIT: Cabrera records a long out to Podsednik. Guillen remains on the bench.
-
SOX vs. Angels 5-30-05
QUOTE(winninguglyin83 @ May 30, 2005 -> 04:01 PM) way to piss off the kind of crowd we've been dreaming about. big inning, fellas. big inning, comin right up. Any runners reach, Ozzie needs to go to the pen. His "gut feeling" with leaving pitchers out too long has cost this team some wins recently.
-
SOX vs. Angels 5-30-05
QUOTE(Jabroni @ May 30, 2005 -> 03:57 PM) Timo in for Frank? Kill me now... Terrible move for Ozzie. Only excuse I'll accept is if Thomas' ankle is aching. Shadows creeping over home plate should not have dictated this PH role.
-
SOX vs. Angels 5-30-05
QUOTE(fathom @ May 30, 2005 -> 03:50 PM) We have got to retire Chone leading off next inning. Finley scares the crap out of me with how he's swinging now. That moment will dictate the remainder of this game. Retire Figgens, and at worst, it's a tie game if Finley jacks one. Figgens reaches, Ozzie may want to consider using Marte against Finley.
-
SOX vs. Angels 5-30-05
QUOTE(fathom @ May 30, 2005 -> 03:42 PM) This game has the worst vibe ever, correct? It's odd how this team performs against Washburn. As if, no matter how well we're hitting or poorly he's pitching, our offense only scratches across 3 runs. However, we'll need more than 3 tonight. I don't believe Buehlre or the pen will shut down the Angels from this point on. Every out recorded in the outfield by Rowand/Pods/Dye is crushed. Only a matter of time before one finds the seats.
-
SOX vs. Angels 5-30-05
QUOTE(JimH @ May 30, 2005 -> 03:40 PM) 38,000+ at the ballpark today. But is it soldout? Mariotti wants to know.
-
SOX vs. Angels 5-30-05
QUOTE(KevHead0881 @ May 30, 2005 -> 03:39 PM) You guys notice that the players that have been kinda s***ty for us this year (Dye, Crede, Konerko & Uribe at times) are always down 0-1 and/or 0-2 in the count? Whether the Bremuda Triangle takes their pitches or swing, they usually guess wrong. Swing first pitch, it's half a foot of the plate. Take first pitch, it's right down the middle. Both result in 0-1 counts.
-
Sox @ Rangers -- 5/29/05
QUOTE(JimH @ May 29, 2005 -> 05:39 PM) As you read a little more, you will find there are people who love to vent their frustration in the game threads, others who are more calm and take a big picture approach, etc. You'll figure it out and you'll be fine. Absolutely. I-HATE-CREDE, if you intend on releasing frustrations during a game, you may want to consider visiting the chat room located on the main page. Friendly environment full of profane arguments and adament Sox fans proving PBP for those unwilling to follow gameday threads.
-
Sox @ Rangers -- 5/29/05
QUOTE(fathom @ May 29, 2005 -> 03:02 PM) Bloop hits will occur more when you dont try and pull every f***ing pitch. Nearly every bloop by the Rangers went towards the opposite field. Coincidence? No, depending on the balls contact with the bat (below/above 'sweet spot'),it could happen whether or not the hitter is purposely attempting to pull a pitch. When Politte pitched in the 7th and the ball dropped between Uribe/Pods, it was not the result of opposite field hitting.
-
Sox @ Rangers -- 5/29/05
QUOTE(ChiSoxFan @ May 29, 2005 -> 02:57 PM) I do love the fact that the Sox have smoked the ball hard in all 3 games only for them to be caught. Meanwhile, the Rangers in between those homeruns, have duck-snorted the Sox to death. Minnesota's offense has mastered bloop hitting for three straight years. I've becomed used to witnessing it.