Jose Abreu

QUOTE (HickoryHuskers @ Dec 16, 2015 -> 11:48 AM) What are the Dodgers going to do with Trayce? 6th OF behind Puig, Ethier, Crawford, Pederson and Van Slyke? I guess so

QUOTE (Buehrle>Wood @ Dec 16, 2015 -> 11:47 AM) Not sure JB Shuck is much worse than Thompson, if at all Agreed.

Wow. Great news. Of course it happened during the one 45-minute period of the day in which I can't look at my phone.

Xavier Nady would say so

QUOTE (striker @ Dec 15, 2015 -> 08:02 PM) I want Jake Lamb. Sounds like he could be had with Drury able to take his place. Interesting 3B candidate who should be relatively cheap. Lawrie could slide to 2B. A back-up plan if we don't land Frazier, perhaps?

Bulls/Grizzlies tonight, should be good

I agree that you should check the browser. For me, I don't use Safari, can't watch videos on Firefox, but I can on Chrome. Seems backwards, I know.

The article suggests trading Quintana, but it's hard to keep wasting Sale/Abreu in their primes. I'd either go all in or all out, meaning if I trade Quintana for a non-Earth shattering return, I'd blow it up and trade Sale/Abreu too.

RIP point streak... had to end with Varlamov in net. Only fitting

QUOTE (DBAHO @ Dec 15, 2015 -> 09:10 PM) DeMarcus Cousins is a bit of fools gold to me. His Usage Rate is Off the Charts and he's only shooting 43% for the season, which for a big man is terrible. Now in the right system and with the right players around him, he's an All - Star, but if you ask him to carry your team, you're going to end up like Sacramento and in mediocrity for a number of years. To be fair, his lower 2015-2016 shooting % is due to the fact that he now takes 4.0 3-pointers a game at 30%, as opposed to 0.0 per game for the rest of his career.

Very gladly. *stubs toe* "G'OH!"

QUOTE (soxfan2014 @ Dec 15, 2015 -> 05:01 PM) Don't see how it's any different than any other site that cites a reference (in this case a tweet). That's all mlbtr is. True, but Sports Mockery is terrible. They once cited me as a source for a Bears rumor. They've cited other posters on here as well.

Should, but won't. Can, but can't. Would, but... shorn't

QUOTE (ChiSoxFanMike @ Dec 15, 2015 -> 04:39 PM) Sports Mockery just posted that the Sox are in on Cespedes, FWIW. Not worth anything. It's Sports Mockery.

Question- why is my "g'oh" at fault when it was posted first?

G'oh.

Exactly, you all messed it up

Man, no

Jokes

Gould sucks

Eh, there's still hockey/football/basketball?

Crazy.

At least they don't have antlers.

QUOTE (SouthsideDon48 @ Dec 15, 2015 -> 12:30 AM) Oh yea? Jose Quintana would like to say hi. QUOTE (SouthsideDon48 @ Dec 15, 2015 -> 12:31 AM) This. But this. QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Dec 14, 2015 -> 01:03 PM) After the fact. The whole concept of risk-reward is the picture BEFORE, not after. And there is no such thing as low-risk, high-reward before hand. It's a fantasy. Either you are high-risk and high-reward, or low-risk and low-reward. If low risk, high reward signings existed, GMs would be jumping at the opportunity to sign Hector Sanchez, or whomever else is classified as low risk, high reward.

You sure he doesn't have a tongue?