LowerCaseRepublican

Ah CubKilla, you always cease to amaze me. But you did shed some light on something. The fact that you and your kind cannot debate your way out of a wet paper bag. You guys are just like Daver without the moderation power. So, f*** it. I've already been told that I should be shot dead here on these boards, and I don't need that s***. Take your warmongering, take your hatred, take your ignorance and go play with that because from now, I officially wash my hands of this s***. Ciao all.

And Roman, America was found on the freedom of speech and the freedom to express ones ideas. I don't need to pledge allegiance to the TWAT (The War Against Terror) to be patriotic.

I don't support American actions that kill people and are used for promoting business interests (Trust me, Roman, I am a history major and am single so I have nothing better to do than extra-curricular reading, so I have read a s***load on the subject) You can serve your country and that is your choice. I insulted the U.S. because the shoe fit with our invasions of Grenada, the Dominican Republic, our funding of the Contras which helped to greatly increase the cocaine usage in America (Congress actually de-classified the documents of the CIA involvement of selling crack cocaine from the Contras during the '80s to help fund the war in Nicaragua because we gave them guns and they gave us drugs which we sold for cash). Take the pistol out and shoot me. Elimination of any dissenters...do you know about the "Night of Long Knives" from Nazi Germany? Hitler went out and had the SS murder all of his political opponents in one night. You are such a Nazi! I should get you the swastika armband and grow the little mustache, man! We screwed people over with McCarthyism in the 1950s. "Under God" was not in the pledge...Did you know that our pledge was actually written in the 1700s by a Socialist preacher. It was not until 1954 to make us different from the atheistic Soviets that we added "Under God to the pledge and "In God we trust" to our currency...McCarthyism was one of the low points for American politics. This guy ruined innocent peoples' lives and had no proof that people were communists. It became a witch hunt. You might want to read the first amendment of the Constitution though, Roman,....seriously, take the head of your ass and read the Constitution. If you are going to protect the nation then you better know what kind of country you are going to protect. If you really want to kill dissenters, then kill me....kill CWSox....kill all members of the churches that have come out against the war....kill the family members that lost loved ones in 9-11 that are fighting to not let Bush and Co to use their family members as a rouse to declare war anywhere...kill college students....kill teachers...at the anti-war and pro-peace movement is growing. grab a gun Roman, looks like you have some slaughtering to do, b****.

HOO-f***ING-RAY FOR ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! And I'll take this time to say :fyou Joe Lieberman :fyou Tipper Gore :fyou Al Gore :fyou Bill Clinton :fyou George W. Bush :fyou Dick Cheney :fyou Colin Powell :fyou Condoleeza Rice :fyou The Republican and Democratic Parties K thx. K thx indeed.

We are on the verge of attacking Iraq for the POSSIBILITY of having nukes...yet we know that Pakistan and North Korea have nukes....and N. Korea is part of the "Axis of Evil" so why aren't we bombing them? And in 1998, at the end of the U.N. inspections, Scott Ritter said that they had over 95% compliance in turning over weapons to inspectors. And for the U.S. using weapons to promote peace....explain to me again how killing civilians and killing people and devestating families on both sides is going to promote peace?!

Were we watching the same show? That guy didn't even get to finish a sentence before Mr. Bill came and starting interjecting with his bulls*** and asking yet another question that he wouldn't allow the guy to answer. I am gonna e-mail Mr. Bill again with the same stuff and see if he reads them....i'll spam the s*** out of him til I get on the air.

WHAT A PATRIOTIC AMERICAN! I guess we all have to pledge allegiance to the war. Guess what? Dubya didn't win the election on 9-11 either! If you don't like it, get the f*** out...the most anti-American statement ever. I know that Ashcroft and the Bush regime have used the Constitution for toilet paper but there is the First Amendment guaranteeing freedom of speech for the pro-war Hawks to the American Knights of the Ku Klux Klan and their racist beliefs to the pacifists that don't like to see state sponsored murder. If you wanna shut me up because I don't want to have my friends (I have 2 friends in West Point that may get shipped out and NUKE who is over in Kuwait right now) go fight and possibly die for cheaper oil prices and to confiscate weapons that the United States sold them in the first place? During the Iran-Iraq war, we knew that Saddam was gassing the Kurds and guess what Roman?.....WE PROVIDED HIM WITH THE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS! If he was so bad, then why did we sell him the weapons? Hmmm.... And if you want to get rid of dissent, then come get me out of my motherf***ing dorm room and f***ing enlist me, beeyotch! How about reading some books by Howard Zinn, William Blum, James W. Loewen, Jerry Fresia, Bishop Sprague, etc. (check my web page for a more descript reading list) Your statement was by far the most ultra-nationalist fascist bulls*** that I have ever read. In Nazi Germany they killed off anybody who dissented against their regime...so, if anybody is the pro-Nazi fanatic...it seems to be you. So, get educated before you go off in a fascist Nazi philosophy blind rage. K thx. K thx indeed.

I support the country that allows people to voice their opinions. I am all for the first amendment. In the end it was shown how ridiculous a number of his claims really were and offered some responses to them. So no I cannot say I support the "not in our name" group because it seems they use far too many appeals to emotion and pity which are the most common logical fallacies and usually a sign of a lack of a solid case. U.N. sanctions that don't allow for the fixture of their water purification plants, refigeration plants, etc. The waterborn diseases like cholera, etc. along with malnutrition have f***ed the Iraqi civilians over. These diseases and not being able to have the materials to fix these problems (that our Gulf War I bombings caused because we targeted those areas) are killing thousands of Iraqi civilians. Yes, Saddam is evil. But bombings? Bombings to get one person. I believe we found that didn't work in catching Hitler...that didn't work catching Osama bin Laden, so why would it work now? He's may be insane but he's not stupid. And about him not wanting U.N. inspectors into his country to see every part of his military complex. Granted, I may be wrong but only one country has actually USED a nuclear device...and U.S. bombs are weapons of mass destruction as well and we've amassed quite the arsenal and we have a cokehead boozehound redneck for a President that is more than willing to use them. Why doesn't the U.N. inspect our weapons? Would we be outraged in that happened to us? That's why the Iraqis are pissed off. Saddam can be taken out without massive bombings that kill civilians.

Thank you for the sarcasm, Zach. But even conservative pundit, Bill O'Reilly said that SUV's need to be better made and more regulated to get more gas mileage and be built more safely (did you see that part too, Baggio?...cuz for like one of the rare times, I actually agreed with him, haha)

A little food for thought for the Hawks on this board.

And if Bill is so great, then how come he won't read or respond to any of my e-mails? (and yes, I have read his book "No Spin Zone" and it was nearly just like "Raising PG Kids In an X Rated Society" by censorship Nazi Tipper Gore) I've e-mailed him a few times and don't get anything....(wasn't expecting to either ) Don't get me wrong, I hate the Democrats too. With Joe Lieberman being in cahoots with Pat Robertson and the Christian Right, his friendship with Bush I's drug czar who was quoted as saying that we should "lock up all African Americans in Washington DC on barges in the Potomac" in order to fight drugs...the fact that Joe is on the Parents' Television Council who has gotten shows like Family Guy taken off the air (note: L. Brent Bozell III, the leader of the group, his father was part of the Goldwater campaign and was all for nuking the Russians....What a nice Christian family) And Lieberman is also part of the PMRC which has gotten the "Parental Advisory" labels on albums and is looking to ban and censor even more albums (like Alanis Morrisette...she swears on her albums and gets no sticker...so she gets carried by Wal-Mart but black rappers swear and get a sticker and don't get carried). Bill Clinton was the best Republican president we ever had with the passage of NAFTA, GATT, and my favorite....the bombing of Sudanese pharmaceudical plants while also bombing Serbian trains and the occassional Chinese Embassy. And Al Gore...the guy is a fascist schmuck too if he can stay married to that censoring b****, Tipper and get her Congressional hearings about music and how Marilyn Manson needs to be banned for causing Columbine (my question is...if those 2 kids who committed Columbine loved Manson so much...why didn't they wait 5 days and go see his live show when he was playing in Denver?) All the political parties here are becoming homogenized. They are all pro-killing people (i.e. either fetuses or thru the use of the death penalty), they are all pro-WTO, they are all pro-GATT, they are all for Social Security and they all get money from the same PAC contributors. Where is the choice? It's a two-party state masquerading as a 1 party state. We get MTv telling us how to be teenagers, the news telling us one side of the story and hiding negative stories because they are owned by corporations, we have unsafe genetic mutations being put in our food supply thru genetic engineering, we have not ratified CEDAW (a U.N. declaration that countries that sign on will attempt to better the rights and social condition of women....only the U.S., Iraq, and Afghanistan have not signed)....and what are we worried about????? A third world nation that doesn't have the capacity to hurt us if it even wanted to. How about hunting down Osama bin Laden and capturing him... Or even better how about getting corporations like Halliburton (yes, THAT Halliburton that Dick Cheney used to be the CEO of) and get on their case for selling Iraq pulse generators in 2001 that have the capability to be used to detonate nuclear devices, so IF Iraq has them, the US gave them the means to detonate them! How f***ing brilliant!......why aren't the news sources covering that?!

Liberally slanted education? LMFAO! In my Educational Policy Studies course, we just read numerous documents about college professors being fired.....FIRED for asking questions like "Why do the terrorists hate us so much?" and saying stuff like "They hate us because we don't know why they hate us." I hate all forms of violence...the Clinton bombings in Yugoslavia, the first Gulf War, the upcoming Gulf War part II. I have learned stuff outside of school.....Howard Zinn, emeritus professor at Boston University...William Blum, former member of the State Department...Dr. James Loewen....these men and others know what they are talking about and can document their evidence. And liberal media? You just about made me wet my pants laughing...that's a good one. General Electric owns NBC. They also own a weapons manufacturing plant...so they aren't going to tell about the anti-war movement increasing because that could hurt their weapons sales. Large conglomerate corporations that donate to conservative regimes (www.opensecrets.org)...so explain to me how they are liberally slanted again? Or is this just like the Jewish conspiracy where the Jews control all the money in the entire world and control all the banking systems so you can have a reason to justify your hatred? I suggest for everybody to read "It's a Free Country". It is a collection of essays by both conservatives and liberals and how they fear that the War on Terrorism is being used to limit our civil liberties...so the hatred of Dubya Bush's actions is not just a partisan thing.

I think we all know that Bill O'Reilly is a f***ing schmuck. And if you think it is only Democrats that are questioning the possibility of the war on Iraq, check out Republican representative Ron Paul's questions that he raised during the debates. HERE THEY ARE: Is it not true that the reason we did not bomb the Soviet Union at the height of the Cold War was because we knew they could retaliate? Is it not also true that we are willing to bomb Iraq now because we know it cannot retaliate- which just confirms that there is no real threat? Is it not true that those who argue that even with inspections we cannot be sure that Hussein might be hiding weapons, at the same time imply that we can be more sure that weapons exist in the absence of inspections? Is it not true that the UN’s International Atomic Energy Agency was able to complete its yearly verification mission to Iraq just this year with Iraqi cooperation? Is it not true that the intelligence community has been unable to develop a case tying Iraq to global terrorism at all, much less the attacks on the United States last year? Does anyone remember that 15 of the 19 hijackers came from Saudi Arabia and that none came from Iraq? Was former CIA counter-terrorism chief Vincent Cannistraro wrong when he recently said there is no confirmed evidence of Iraq’s links to terrorism? Is it not true that the CIA has concluded there is no evidence that a Prague meeting between 9/11 hijacker Atta and Iraqi intelligence took place? Is it not true that northern Iraq, where the administration claimed al-Qaeda were hiding out, is in the control of our "allies," the Kurds? Is it not true that the vast majority of al-Qaeda leaders who escaped appear to have safely made their way to Pakistan, another of our so-called allies? Has anyone noticed that Afghanistan is rapidly sinking into total chaos, with bombings and assassinations becoming daily occurrences; and that according to a recent UN report the al-Qaeda "is, by all accounts, alive and well and poised to strike again, how, when and where it chooses" Why are we taking precious military and intelligence resources away from tracking down those who did attack the United States- and who may again attack the United States- and using them to invade countries that have not attacked the United States? Would an attack on Iraq not just confirm the Arab world's worst suspicions about the US- and isn't this what bin Laden wanted? How can Hussein be compared to Hitler when he has no navy or air force, and now has an army 1/5 the size of twelve years ago, which even then proved totally inept at defending the country? Is it not true that the constitutional power to declare war is exclusively that of the Congress? Should presidents, contrary to the Constitution, allow Congress to concur only when pressured by public opinion? Are presidents permitted to rely on the UN for permission to go to war? Are you aware of a Pentagon report studying charges that thousands of Kurds in one village were gassed by the Iraqis, which found no conclusive evidence that Iraq was responsible, that Iran occupied the very city involved, and that evidence indicated the type of gas used was more likely controlled by Iran not Iraq? Is it not true that anywhere between 100,000 and 300,000 US soldiers have suffered from Persian Gulf War syndrome from the first Gulf War, and that thousands may have died? Are we prepared for possibly thousands of American casualties in a war against a country that does not have the capacity to attack the United States? Are we willing to bear the economic burden of a 100 billion dollar war against Iraq, with oil prices expected to skyrocket and further rattle an already shaky American economy? How about an estimated 30 years occupation of Iraq that some have deemed necessary to "build democracy" there? Iraq’s alleged violations of UN resolutions are given as reason to initiate an attack, yet is it not true that hundreds of UN Resolutions have been ignored by various countries without penalty? Did former President Bush not cite the UN Resolution of 1990 as the reason he could not march into Baghdad, while supporters of a new attack assert that it is the very reason we can march into Baghdad? Is it not true that, contrary to current claims, the no-fly zones were set up by Britain and the United States without specific approval from the United Nations? If we claim membership in the international community and conform to its rules only when it pleases us, does this not serve to undermine our position, directing animosity toward us by both friend and foe? How can our declared goal of bringing democracy to Iraq be believable when we prop up dictators throughout the Middle East and support military tyrants like Musharaf in Pakistan, who overthrew a democratically-elected president? Are you familiar with the 1994 Senate Hearings that revealed the U.S. knowingly supplied chemical and biological materials to Iraq during the Iran-Iraq war and as late as 1992- including after the alleged Iraqi gas attack on a Kurdish village? Did we not assist Saddam Hussein’s rise to power by supporting and encouraging his invasion of Iran? Is it honest to criticize Saddam now for his invasion of Iran, which at the time we actively supported? Is it not true that preventive war is synonymous with an act of aggression, and has never been considered a moral or legitimate US policy? Why do the oil company executives strongly support this war if oil is not the real reason we plan to take over Iraq? Why is it that those who never wore a uniform and are confident that they won’t have to personally fight this war are more anxious for this war than our generals? What is the moral argument for attacking a nation that has not initiated aggression against us and could not if it wanted? Where does the Constitution grant us permission to wage war for any reason other than self-defense? Is it not true that a war against Iraq rejects the sentiments of the time-honored Treaty of Westphalia, nearly 400 years ago, that countries should never go into another for the purpose of regime change? Is it not true that the more civilized a society is, the less likely disagreements will be settled by war? Is it not true that since World War II Congress has not declared war and- not coincidentally- we have not since then had a clear-cut victory? Is it not true that Pakistan, especially through its intelligence services, was an active supporter and key organizer of the Taliban? Why don't those who want war bring a formal declaration of war resolution to the floor of Congress? ----- Baggs, did you know that there is a group of 9-11 family members that lost loved ones who have united in a group working to prevent the Bush administration from using their dead family members to justify the USA Patriot Act, a war in Iraq, etc. because they don't see how Iraq played any role in 9-11 since they didn't. I did watch that "Not In Our Name" guy talk to Bill O'Reilly and Bill twisted his words like a motherf***er. He did not allow the guy to tell the people about how we bombed refigeration plants, water purification plants and other non-military targets. This has caused cholera and other diseases that they had gotten rid of because the U.S. sanctions will not allow for Iraqis to get the materials to fix these plants. Did you also know that nearly every day we have been flying bombers over Iraq and bombing Iraqi places on a consistant basis since 1991. The sanctions (which don't allow dolls in Iraq, for instance....Dolls! DOLLS! What the f*** does Saddam care about dolls?) and the constant U.S. bombings of Iraq that have killed numerous people (the numbers are in the hundreds of thousands) from malnutrition and the diseases that the U.S. caused by destroying water purification plants so that little children can't even get pure drinking water. The U.N. has had the most resignations in protest of the U.S. "terrorist" bombing in Iraq in the history of the U.N. That is what the United States is responsible for over there. And yes, Saddam did gas the Kurds...but too bad that he got a lot of the chemical and biological weapons from U.S. corporations (check the PETA f***ing Sucks thread for the names of the corporations because I already posted them in there.) Saddam is indeed a threat, but I don't think that bombing communities will kill him. We tried that in 1991 and it didn't work.

WELL f*** YOU, SIDESHOW!!!!! :fyou I'm just quoting what a scout said in Sports Illustrated before the beginning of last season.

There is plenty of room for the Dubya hate. www.gwbush.com - that site inspired one of my favorite Dubya quotes....."There ought to be limits to freedom"

I've got a few words to compliment this thread........... Soxtalk f***ing rules! and WSI......doesn't as much. In my words, WSI f***ing blows llama cock! :fyou :fyou :fyou :fyou :fyou WSI! Eat my s***, then s*** out your s*** then I'll make you eat the s*** made up of your and my s***, you f***os! Pa-yow Beeyotch!

I posted this before (I believe yesterday morning when that WIUSox asshat was f***ing with me and CWSox). Maddox is the greatest thing since sliced bread, haha. I also love his one about non-Japanese people who co-opt Japanese anime and culture. And Dubya Bush does f***ing suck ass and his entire spiel about Dubya is true.

Let's not get our hopes up

His comments in the game remind me a lot of his stupid ass comments in Madden. That game is great but the commentary is so annoying. I play the game muted now because I f***ing hate Maddenisms so goddamn much.

I was listening to them in the first qtr. and Al Michaels had mentioned something about FG or scoring first being a good omen for the Raiders since they had done well in many of the games where they scored first. So, Madden's response...."Well there's another omen.....The Buccaneers have the ball." Now I ask you.....Is Madden incredibly f***ing stupid or just goddamn senile?!?! WTF? SERIOUSLY! :fyou that f***ing fat 5 chinned motherf***er and his stupid moronically obvious comments about football. John Madden is a fat useless piece of s*** and should be killed and his carcass used to feed small, starving children in Africa.

That Back Judge who called the force out an incomplete pass on the 2 pt. conversion is the most blind f*** that I have ever seen. How the f*** can you be THAT close to the play and still miss the call?! HOLY DOGs***! :fyou

http://www.bk2k.com/bushbodycount/index.shtml

I posted the infamous picture of Adolf Hitler with a young boy and it had the caption from Hitler's mouth saying "Ah young Daver, you'll make a fine moderator"...and they banned me. I was under post moderation there for a while for f***ing swearing too. Then after my comments on SnR about Daver and PHG, they really didn't like me, hahaha. :fyou them

Carlos Lee is still a fat Panamanian that is, to quote scouts "a train wreck in LF"

http://maddox.xmission.com/limits_to_freedom.html This is a rant from The Best Page In the Universe. Since we are talking about Bush, I found it fitting.