Jump to content

May 24 game thread Sox at D-backs


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

QUOTE (yesterday333 @ May 24, 2017 -> 09:10 PM)
Isnt it a bit short sighted for one not great game to assume it changes anything from 3 hours ago...

 

We were saying his value wasn't as high as we thought for a while on here. Teams just don't think he's an ace

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (OmarComing25 @ May 24, 2017 -> 04:12 PM)
Not a great start for Q but on the bright side following on Game Day it seems like only a couple of these balls have been hit hard. I'm also not that concerned about ERA, peripherals are much more important IMO.

 

3 doubles and a home run were hit softly?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (OmarComing25 @ May 24, 2017 -> 09:12 PM)
Not a great start for Q but on the bright side following on Game Day it seems like only a couple of these balls have been hit hard. I'm also not that concerned about ERA, peripherals are much more important IMO.

 

This is about as bad as he's pitched over course of last two innings

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (fathom @ May 24, 2017 -> 09:05 PM)
Why force a trade when you don't have to?

 

We have control over the Q contract for three years. There is no need to trade him . We aren't in a panic situation. The wheels fell off this game but all pitchers have bad games

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (harkness @ May 24, 2017 -> 09:13 PM)
I've always just had to accept Jose Quintana's good numbers as his quality and value...

 

But watching him pitch is like going to have a cavity replace.

 

It's just god awful.

 

What? You mean this game?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (fathom @ May 24, 2017 -> 04:13 PM)
This is about as bad as he's pitched over course of last two innings

I'll take the L on this one but I still think people worry about ERA too much, I don't think GMs pay that much attention to it these days. In general for trade value I think a 7IP, 4ER, 9K, 0BB outing is better than a 7IP, 0ER, 2K, 3BB type of performance.

Edited by OmarComing25
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (OmarComing25 @ May 24, 2017 -> 03:23 PM)
I'll take the L on this one but I still think people worry about ERA too much, I don't think GMs pay that much attention to it these days. In general for trade value I think a 7IP, 4ER, 9K, 0BB outing is better than a 7IP, 0ER, 2K, 3BB type of performance.

 

Ummm, no.

 

That's pitching without your best stuff and still gutting out a win.

Edited by caulfield12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (Tony @ May 24, 2017 -> 06:02 PM)
Jose is just KILLING the ball.

 

Ron weeps....

 

He goes through the same thing every year it seems. The cycle goes something like ---> looks like s*** --> starts shooting some RBI singles into RF on occasion but still mostly looks like s*** ---> starts hitting HR and line drives everywhere ---> starts taking walks in addition to hitting line drives and HRs ---> looks like s***.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...