December 1, 20178 yr Chicago White Sox @whitesox now The #WhiteSox have agreed to terms on a one-year, $1.05-million contract with right-handed pitcher Danny Farquhar, avoiding arbitration.
December 1, 20178 yr QUOTE (flavum @ Dec 1, 2017 -> 01:13 PM) http://m.whitesox.mlb.com/news/article/262...opicId=27118146 About six hours until the deadline. Merkin hints Putnam, Petricka, and Alburquerque as non-tender possibilities. Not sure if that’s based on knowledge given to him, but maybe. QUOTE (Sleepy Harold @ Dec 1, 2017 -> 01:17 PM) Chicago White Sox @whitesox now The #WhiteSox have agreed to terms on a one-year, $1.05-million contract with right-handed pitcher Danny Farquhar, avoiding arbitration. Maybe he does know something since he didn't list Lord Farquhar in that tweet?
December 1, 20178 yr QUOTE (soxfan2014 @ Dec 1, 2017 -> 01:18 PM) Maybe he does know something since he didn't list Lord Farquhar in that tweet? Probably, since Merkin is basically an extension of the Sox PR Dept.
December 1, 20178 yr QUOTE (flavum @ Dec 1, 2017 -> 01:21 PM) Probably, since Merkin is basically an extension of the Sox PR Dept. Yeah. Farquhar seems like he would be included in the group of "possible non-tendered candidates" for sure if it was just a guessing game. Edited December 1, 20178 yr by soxfan2014
December 1, 20178 yr QUOTE (Sleepy Harold @ Dec 1, 2017 -> 01:17 PM) Chicago White Sox @whitesox now The #WhiteSox have agreed to terms on a one-year, $1.05-million contract with right-handed pitcher Danny Farquhar, avoiding arbitration. Danny Farquhar was in the organization? Hum, shows where I've been
December 1, 20178 yr QUOTE (Lip Man 1 @ Dec 1, 2017 -> 04:17 PM) Bleh! You sure like complaining about odd things. $1M for a guy like Farquhar to fill a spot in a rebuilding team’s depleted bullpen is normal course of business. We need someone to pitch innings and you’re not going to get anything much better for the price. It may be a boring move, but I don’t see how it warrants complaints.
December 1, 20178 yr QUOTE (Chicago White Sox @ Dec 1, 2017 -> 05:48 PM) You sure like complaining about odd things. $1M for a guy like Farquhar to fill a spot in a rebuilding team’s depleted bullpen is normal course of business. We need someone to pitch innings and you’re not going to get anything much better for the price. It may be a boring move, but I don’t see how it warrants complaints. Agreed, we need bodies out there to eat innings during the rebuild. Farquhar is a serviceable middle reliever for 2018.
December 1, 20178 yr QUOTE (Chicago White Sox @ Dec 1, 2017 -> 04:48 PM) You sure like complaining about odd things. $1M for a guy like Farquhar to fill a spot in a rebuilding team's depleted bullpen is normal course of business. We need someone to pitch innings and you're not going to get anything much better for the price. It may be a boring move, but I don't see how it warrants complaints. It is really a $200k deposit on an arm. They could still release him later on and pay him only 20% of that.
December 2, 20178 yr QUOTE (Chicago White Sox @ Dec 1, 2017 -> 03:48 PM) You sure like complaining about odd things. $1M for a guy like Farquhar to fill a spot in a rebuilding team’s depleted bullpen is normal course of business. We need someone to pitch innings and you’re not going to get anything much better for the price. It may be a boring move, but I don’t see how it warrants complaints. I think the guy is a stiff. No future. Rather give some kids a shot since they are still rebuilding next year. Some of them may prove useful when the team is actually good.
December 2, 20178 yr QUOTE (Lip Man 1 @ Dec 1, 2017 -> 06:16 PM) I think the guy is a stiff. No future. Rather give some kids a shot since they are still rebuilding next year. Some of them may prove useful when the team is actually good. What kids? Have you seen our AAA depth chart? It’s not exactly overflowing major league ready bullpen talent.
December 2, 20178 yr QUOTE (Lip Man 1 @ Dec 1, 2017 -> 07:16 PM) I think the guy is a stiff. No future. Rather give some kids a shot since they are still rebuilding next year. Some of them may prove useful when the team is actually good. I agree but we ran through a lot of young pitchers last year from AAA and no one really stood out to me that can't be obviously penciled into the bullpen. We might have some more arms to look at by late '18 early '19. Edited December 2, 20178 yr by soxforlife05
December 2, 20178 yr Well, you don’t want to rush young kids that aren’t ready up to the big leagues...even in low-pressure bullpen situations. Besides, the odds are someone like Fulmer or Lopez ends up there eventually. Nothing to get upset about. It would be more upsetting if they kept investing resources into Putnam and Petricka with limited payout even if they performed above expectations.
December 2, 20178 yr White Sox only have 7 guys on their 40 man roster that are legitimate bullpen options for next year: Aaron Bummer, Jace Fry, Dylan Covey, Danny Farquhar, Nate Jones, Juan Minaya, and Gregory Infante. They will be adding a ton of pitching
December 2, 20178 yr QUOTE (Y2JImmy0 @ Dec 2, 2017 -> 08:23 AM) White Sox only have 7 guys on their 40 man roster that are legitimate bullpen options for next year: Aaron Bummer, Jace Fry, Dylan Covey, Danny Farquhar, Nate Jones, Juan Minaya, and Gregory Infante. They will be adding a ton of pitching Burdi. He should be up at some point.
December 2, 20178 yr QUOTE (Y2JImmy0 @ Dec 2, 2017 -> 08:23 AM) White Sox only have 7 guys on their 40 man roster that are legitimate bullpen options for next year: Aaron Bummer, Jace Fry, Dylan Covey, Danny Farquhar, Nate Jones, Juan Minaya, and Gregory Infante. They will be adding a ton of pitching You forgot Vieira, but the point remains the same. And I didn’t realize Jones could be ready by spring training, thought he was going to be out longer. Glad to see I was wrong on that one.
December 2, 20178 yr QUOTE (Chicago White Sox @ Dec 2, 2017 -> 08:44 AM) You forgot Vieira, but the point remains the same. And I didn't realize Jones could be ready by spring training, thought he was going to be out longer. Glad to see I was wrong on that one. That is why I was surprised about Petricka. Could these guys still be resigned to deals?
December 2, 20178 yr QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Dec 2, 2017 -> 09:03 AM) That is why I was surprised about Petricka. Could these guys still be resigned to deals? Yeah they could bring them back on minor league deals.
December 2, 20178 yr QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Dec 2, 2017 -> 09:03 AM) That is why I was surprised about Petricka. Could these guys still be resigned to deals? Yeah they can sign minor league deals. There was even an article about Putnam where he commented about not knowing if he would be tendered and if he isn't if he would be back with the White Sox to do rehab.
December 2, 20178 yr QUOTE (GenericUserName @ Dec 2, 2017 -> 09:09 AM) Yeah they can sign minor league deals. There was even an article about Putnam where he commented about not knowing if he would be tendered and if he isn't if he would be back with the White Sox to do rehab. Putnam is out until somewhere around the All-Star break at least. I predicted months ago he would be gone.
December 2, 20178 yr QUOTE (GenericUserName @ Dec 2, 2017 -> 09:09 AM) Yeah they can sign minor league deals. There was even an article about Putnam where he commented about not knowing if he would be tendered and if he isn't if he would be back with the White Sox to do rehab. This is common practice with fringe guys. Don't take up a roster spot because they can't pitch, but keep them in the organization to bring back to the MLB at a later date.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.