Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Soxtalk.com

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Betts to Dodgers

Featured Replies

Just now, soxfan2014 said:

But we already traded for a RF that they want to give a chance to at a cheaper price and has 2 years of control. What are you missing?

Who cares?  Trade crap for the better outfielder (Joc) and trade Mazara for a reliever.  What are you missing?

  • Replies 480
  • Views 56.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • ChiSoxFanMike
    ChiSoxFanMike

    What a massive overreaction.

  • Its obvious that the Dodgers werent going to trade Joc if they couldnt get Betts. Lets not pretend that it would have been a good idea to wait until the Dodgers made a move before looking for RF help.

  • Such a weird debate some of you are backing. The Angels got Joc for nothing bc the current price, due to the Dodgers' needs post Mookie trade, was much less than it was before they landed Betts.

1 minute ago, Moan4Yoan said:

But your argument makes no sense.  The Angels are just another team like the White Sox, and they gave up jack squat for Joc.  What was stopping the Sox from making a crappy offer for Joc?

I mean, I'm sure the Sox were contacted again by the Dodgers. Mazara could have been dumped for RP.

3 minutes ago, Moan4Yoan said:

Who cares?  Trade crap for the better outfielder (Joc) and trade Mazara for a reliever.  What are you missing?

Whos to say we didn't make any kind of offer/had talks with Dodgers?

Edited by soxfan2014

Just now, BackDoorBreach said:

I mean, I'm sure the Sox were contacted again by the Dodgers. Mazara could have been dumped for RP.

Exactly.  I didn’t know GMs are only allowed to make a set number of trades involving outfielders.

Just now, Moan4Yoan said:

Exactly.  I didn’t know GMs are only allowed to make a set number of trades involving outfielders.

I don't know about you, but I think they really, really like Mazara. 

He hasn't shown much yet but if they unlock his swing and get him hitting fly balls he could be a monster. 

Edited by Jack Parkman

Just now, soxfan2014 said:

Whos to say we didn't make any kind of offer/have talks with Dodgers?

Not being able or willing to top Luis Rengifo as your offer for Joc is a pretty damn good sign.

1 minute ago, Jack Parkman said:

I don't know about you, but I think they really, really like Mazara. 

They do. They were interested at the deadline last year. So its obvious they are going to commit to him for (hopefully) 2 years.

Edited by soxfan2014

1 minute ago, Moan4Yoan said:

Not being able or willing to top Luis Rengifo as your offer for Joc is a pretty damn good sign.

But the front office really likes Mazara...the guy they just traded for and wanted in July last year.

Edited by soxfan2014

1 minute ago, Moan4Yoan said:

Exactly.  I didn’t know GMs are only allowed to make a set number of trades involving outfielders.

You already beat the horse months ago.

1 minute ago, soxfan2014 said:

They do. They were interested at the deadline last year. So its obvious they are going to commit to him for (hopefully) 2 years.

It could be a good gamble. I feel like I'm the only Sox fan bullish on Mazara. 

Again, if they can get Mazara hitting fly balls he's going to absolutely rake. 

Edited by Jack Parkman

1 minute ago, hi8is said:

You already beat the horse months ago.

This is his schtick. Criticize front office for everything. Dude literally lives to be miserable on this site.

Edited by soxfan2014

Just now, Jack Parkman said:

It could be a good gamble. I feel like I'm the only Sox fan bullish on Mazara. 

I'm good with giving him a chance.

Just now, soxfan2014 said:

But the front office really likes Mazara...

Good for them.  But there really isn’t much doubt that Joc is a better RF than Mazara.

8 minutes ago, soxfan2014 said:

This is his schtick. Criticize front office for everything. Dude literally lives to be miserable on this site.

I’m not sure what you are arguing here.  I was happy with all of the offseason moves except for Mazara and I stated as much.

The Angels gave up a much lesser prospect for one year of a better outfielder than the Sox gave up for two years of a worse outfielder.  Do you disagree with this?

Edited by Moan4Yoan

12 minutes ago, Jack Parkman said:

I don't know about you, but I think they really, really like Mazara. 

He hasn't shown much yet but if they unlock his swing and get him hitting fly balls he could be a monster. 

I think you are right Jack.  Mazara was a target and they want him to play.

3 minutes ago, Moan4Yoan said:

I’m not sure what you are arguing here.  I was happy with all of the offseason moves except for Mazara and I stated as much.

The Angels gave up a much lesser prospect for one year of a better outfielder than the Sox gave up for two years of a worse outfielder.  Do you disagree with this?

I don't disagree that Pederson is better but from everything we've read, they really like Mazara. Dude has some serious upside with the bat. So its not shocking they wouldn't trade for someone else. 

1 minute ago, soxfan2014 said:

I don't disagree that Pederson is better but from everything we've read, they really like Mazara. Dude has some serious upside with the bat. So its not shocking they wouldn't trade for someone else. 

I’ll take the proven performance for one year at a cheaper cost in talent than hope for upside for two years of control and a higher cost in talent.

Edited by Moan4Yoan

So a few points on the Twins move here:

1. I wonder if they're not nearly as high on Graterol as they could be. He has a big arm but he only threw 61 innings last year, and with that his K-rate looks comparable to Reynaldo Lopez's in the minors.

2. I don't see him ranked anywhere near where Cease was, for that comparison that was made in this thread. BP had him #33 last year, but MLB.com currently has him #83.

3. If nothing else - if his arm takes a couple years to build up, that could dramatically drop his value to them.. Overall, a likely 3 win pitcher with multiple years of control giving them 9-12 WAR, Graterol could outearn that.

Trying to figure out their logic here. Not sure I believe it but it's a case. 

  • Author

 

4 minutes ago, Moan4Yoan said:

I’ll take the proven performance for one year at a cheaper cost in talent than hope for upside for two years of control and a higher cost in talent.

Ok but the argument is literally from the Sox perspective as to why they didn't. Not yours.

1 minute ago, aeichhor said:

 

Okay, this would make more sense.

Just now, aeichhor said:

 

Makes sense. Everyone can chill with the takes haha what are we, rookies at baseball news? Theres usually more players.

1 minute ago, soxfan2014 said:

Ok but the argument is literally from the Sox perspective as to why they didn't. Not yours.

I would hope that Hahn and the Sox aren’t that narrow-minded when a better player becomes available.  And I don’t think they are.    For example, they signed Grandal because they know McCann is fool’s gold.

4 minutes ago, Balta1701 said:

So a few points on the Twins move here:

1. I wonder if they're not nearly as high on Graterol as they could be. He has a big arm but he only threw 61 innings last year, and with that his K-rate looks comparable to Reynaldo Lopez's in the minors.

2. I don't see him ranked anywhere near where Cease was, for that comparison that was made in this thread. BP had him #33 last year, but MLB.com currently has him #83.

3. If nothing else - if his arm takes a couple years to build up, that could dramatically drop his value to them.. Overall, a likely 3 win pitcher with multiple years of control giving them 9-12 WAR, Graterol could outearn that.

Trying to figure out their logic here. Not sure I believe it but it's a case. 

Reading takes from their fan site, they assume Graterol is a reliever and they got a starter w control for him. It will be interesting to see where Boston intends to use him. 

4 minutes ago, soxfan2014 said:

Makes sense. Everyone can chill with the takes haha what are we, rookies at baseball news? Theres usually more players.

Trout to Dodgers???

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.