Having watched Singo get credit for two saves by only getting one out in each game, I was thinking it would be fair to divide saves into thirds, based on the last inning pitched. Under this system Marte would have earned 2/3's of a save and Shingo 1/3rd. Am I crazy or is there any merit to this idea?

you're crazy.

You're crazy.

 

And, BTW, Shingo pitched the full inning in the first game.

You're crazy.

 

And, BTW, Shingo pitched the full inning in the first game.

 

I know that. For that game he would get a complete save. I'm talking about the one out in Minn. and the one yesterday.

 

Now tell me why I'm crazy.

Nah 2 me that actually sounds good. Give credit were credit is due. Tho however this may screw up some things

 

save = last pitchs of the game.

does save = 9th inning? etc.

i just think their shouldnt be a save... although i guess maybe it could be changed if their was a runner in scoring position... Not if its just 1 out or if only a guy on 1B.

So, on the same thought Garcia should have only gotten 8/9 of a win yesterday?

So, on the same thought Garcia should have only gotten 8/9 of a win yesterday?

 

No. There are rules for wins already in place. That's why there is a difference between a win and a save. All I'm suggesting is that both Marte and Hermanson deserve some of the credit for getting two guys out in the 9th inning.

No. There are rules for wins already in place. That's why there is a difference between a win and a save. All I'm suggesting is that both Marte and Hermanson deserve some of the credit for getting two guys out in the 9th inning.

Perhaps you've never heard of a hold before.

Perhaps you've never heard of a hold before.

 

 

haha, damn good point, this ends this post

haha, damn good point, this ends this post

 

You lack vision.

If by not wanting to make stat keeping in baseball MORE confusing, I lack vision - then yes, I lack vision.

QUOTE(Tannerfan @ Apr 12, 2005 -> 10:35 PM)

No. There are rules for wins already in place. That's why there is a difference between a win and a save. All I'm suggesting is that both Marte and Hermanson deserve some of the credit for getting two guys out in the 9th inning.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

So what is your point? There are rules for saves already in place as well. You want to change those rules so someone else sarcastically suggested that we change the rules for wins. This is a bunch of nonsense.

So what is your point? There are rules for saves already in place as well. You want to change those rules so someone else sarcastically suggested that we change the rules for wins. This is a bunch of nonsense.

Thank you.

 

 

Cheat, you beat me to the "hold."

QUOTE(SoxFan101 @ Apr 12, 2005 -> 10:23 PM)

i just think their shouldnt be a save... although i guess maybe it could be changed if their was a runner in scoring position... Not if its just 1 out or if only a guy on 1B.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

 

 

THERE should really be more help for kids with THEIR English today. You must learn how to use their and there. 2 different meanings to 2 totally different words. Please learn the difference.

You lack vision.

Okay, I think you're utterly wrong on this but still believe this is one of the funnier responses I've seen. So odd it's funny.

THERE should really be more help for kids with THEIR English today. You must learn how to use their and there. 2 different meanings to 2 totally different words. Please learn the difference.

:finger who cares

THERE should really be more help for kids with THEIR English today. You must learn how to use their and there. 2 different meanings to 2 totally different words. Please learn the difference.

 

Seriously who gives a s***

 

Whats worse is people who point out others grammar mistakes on a message board... Calm Down Mavis Beacon

THERE should really be more help for kids with THEIR English today. You must learn how to use their and there. 2 different meanings to 2 totally different words. Please learn the difference.

 

You just dissed like half the site, including the chief administrator.

  Okay, I think you're utterly wrong on this but still believe this is one of the funnier responses I've seen.  So odd it's funny.

 

What can I tell you, I work in the movie business, that's how we talk.

Well, i guess I LACK VISION.....hahahah fine if were changing rules how about we add a line of red seats in the outfield and make it the "double" homerun mark.....how fun would baseball when you could double the runs of a homerun......

 

 

Now do I lack vision??? I think not

Well, i guess I LACK VISION.....hahahah fine if were changing rules how about we add a line of red seats in the outfield and make it the "double" homerun mark.....how fun would baseball when you could double the runs of a homerun......

Now do I lack vision??? I think not

I like it!

Well, i guess I LACK VISION.....hahahah fine if were changing rules how about we add a line of red seats in the outfield and make it the "double" homerun mark.....how fun would baseball when you could double the runs of a homerun......

Now do I lack vision??? I think not

I'm talking about a statistic not a rule change. But I guess this is to complex for you.

I'm talking about a statistic not a rule change. But I guess this is to complex for you.

They get a "hold" now. That's a statistic.

THERE should really be more help for kids with THEIR English today. You must learn how to use their and there. 2 different meanings to 2 totally different words. Please learn the difference.

 

 

when did soxtalk become English class?