nitetrain8601 Posted January 26, 2006 Share Posted January 26, 2006 http://chicagosports.chicagotribune.com/sp...-home-headlines Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockRaines Posted January 26, 2006 Share Posted January 26, 2006 it was mentioned awhile ago, and makes alot of sense to me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoodAsGould Posted January 26, 2006 Share Posted January 26, 2006 He is a very important part of the Steelers offense since they run a lot of trick plays or whatevr u want to call them..... Id think they would do everything they can to bring him back.. anyone know their cap situation? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WilliamTell Posted January 26, 2006 Share Posted January 26, 2006 The Bears need another top receiver. Getting any good receiver will extremely help them. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Bartman's my idol Posted January 26, 2006 Share Posted January 26, 2006 The Bears need another top receiver. Getting any good receiver will extremely help them. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I'd love to see the Bears get him. Â Would you take a chance at T.O.? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nitetrain8601 Posted January 26, 2006 Author Share Posted January 26, 2006 QUOTE(Steve Bartman's my idol @ Jan 26, 2006 -> 02:30 PM) I'd love to see the Bears get him. Would you take a chance at T.O.?  If I'm the Bears, yes. It seems like Mushin Muhammed is like a Peerless Price type player in which they would excel at being a #2 WR. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Bartman's my idol Posted January 26, 2006 Share Posted January 26, 2006 If I'm the Bears, yes. It seems like Mushin Muhammed is like a Peerless Price type player in which they would excel at being a #2 WR. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I agree 100%. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted January 26, 2006 Share Posted January 26, 2006 QUOTE(nitetrain8601 @ Jan 26, 2006 -> 12:33 PM) If I'm the Bears, yes. It seems like Mushin Muhammed is like a Peerless Price type player in which they would excel at being a #2 WR. Muhammed certainly looked like a #1 receiver 2 years ago when Steve Smith went down for the whole year and Delhomme and Muhammed played catch the whole year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoodAsGould Posted January 26, 2006 Share Posted January 26, 2006 QUOTE(nitetrain8601 @ Jan 26, 2006 -> 08:33 PM) If I'm the Bears, yes. It seems like Mushin Muhammed is like a Peerless Price type player in which they would excel at being a #2 WR. Â Yeah I have no clue where that is coming from.... when Muhsin was the 2nd option he hardly showed up at all in what was it 2003. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted January 27, 2006 Share Posted January 27, 2006 QUOTE(RockRaines @ Jan 26, 2006 -> 12:05 PM) it was mentioned awhile ago, and makes alot of sense to me. Agreed. I just hope people don't overpay him due to his playoff run. I think they will. Kind of like how Az Hakim got way overpaid. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chisoxfn Posted January 27, 2006 Share Posted January 27, 2006 QUOTE(Balta1701 @ Jan 26, 2006 -> 12:48 PM) Muhammed certainly looked like a #1 receiver 2 years ago when Steve Smith went down for the whole year and Delhomme and Muhammed played catch the whole year. Even last year where he led the freaking league in receiving and td's, IIRC. Maybe he was 2nd in receiving yards. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted January 27, 2006 Share Posted January 27, 2006 QUOTE(Chisoxfn @ Jan 26, 2006 -> 05:22 PM) Even last year where he led the freaking league in receiving and td's, IIRC. Maybe he was 2nd in receiving yards. That's sort of the year I meant. 2 seasons ago now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nitetrain8601 Posted January 27, 2006 Author Share Posted January 27, 2006 He was also having Jake Delhomme QB him and was in the Carolina offense. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DukeNukeEm Posted January 27, 2006 Share Posted January 27, 2006 Theyre looking at him more for his abilities as a PR man and backup QB Â <gulp> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Palehosefan Posted January 27, 2006 Share Posted January 27, 2006 The Steelers aren't quite as enamored with Antwan as other fans seem to be. He's proven this year that he's not a #2 receiver in the NFL, he was much better as the 3rd option behind Hines and Plax. He's a solid punt returner, but nothing special. Doesn't take what the other special teams give him, always trying for more, even at the cost of field position for his team. He does well with the trick plays, but the Steelers will target someone like Reggie McNeal later on if Reggie struggles at the combines with his passes. McNeal, Brad Smith, or stompy Vick(yuck) will likely be possible targets for the 3rd, 4th, 5th round if they are available. Â With that said, I would like to keep Antwan around, and draft a big WR in the 1st two rounds to compliment Hines. But with the re-signing of Hines, Casey Hampton etc lately, I don't know how much cap room will be available. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DukeNukeEm Posted January 27, 2006 Share Posted January 27, 2006 ARE is easily replaceable. Â find a fast player somewhere. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoodAsGould Posted January 27, 2006 Share Posted January 27, 2006 Personally I think Randle El is a bit overated on these boards also and dont really think he will offer anymore than we could get out of Berrian/Bradley.... especially Berrian who impressed me when united with Grossman..... and Bradley has the potential to be a great WR in the NFL. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DukeNukeEm Posted January 27, 2006 Share Posted January 27, 2006 The problem in the Bears passing attack lies most in its quarterback. But if we can just surrond him with some decent options, he'll pass for more than 1 TD and 200 Yards.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Felix Posted January 27, 2006 Share Posted January 27, 2006 (edited) QUOTE(DukeNukeEm @ Jan 26, 2006 -> 09:11 PM) Theyre looking at him more for his abilities as a PR man and backup QBÂ I'd rather Randel El than Orton.. (I'm not really sure if I'm being serious or not) Edited January 27, 2006 by Felix Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DukeNukeEm Posted January 27, 2006 Share Posted January 27, 2006 Grossman is almost as bad as Orton. Â So what, his pass looks nicer, he stills puts up the same #s Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Felix Posted January 27, 2006 Share Posted January 27, 2006 QUOTE(DukeNukeEm @ Jan 26, 2006 -> 09:41 PM) Grossman is almost as bad as Orton. So what, his pass looks nicer, he stills puts up the same #s This again? Grossman knows how to move the ball on offense, and his deep pass attempts open up the run game for Thomas Jones. The offense has a whole new life when Grossman is in compared to Orton. Grossman >>>>>>>>>> Orton. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DukeNukeEm Posted January 27, 2006 Share Posted January 27, 2006 Im not getting into it. But results are results and we beat Carolina with Orton then lost to them with Grossman (when it really counted I might add.) Â Back to twan. Â He'll probably be the best WR on the team, now the Moose caught the usual Chicago suck-cold. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DukeNukeEm Posted January 27, 2006 Share Posted January 27, 2006 edit on the above post, Muhammad cant catch anything. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoodAsGould Posted January 27, 2006 Share Posted January 27, 2006 QUOTE(DukeNukeEm @ Jan 27, 2006 -> 02:45 AM) Im not getting into it. But results are results and we beat Carolina with Orton then lost to them with Grossman (when it really counted I might add.) Back to twan.  He'll probably be the best WR on the team, now the Moose caught the usual Chicago suck-cold.  I dont want this to get into a whole long argument... but we would of lost the first game and would of been blown out if our defense played like they did in the playoffs during our 1st match with the Panthers.... on that game Orton had 2 short scoring drives thanks to the defense and one scoring drive of his own(3 points)..... Grossman led us to 21 points without any help from the defense.... also prob would of been 24 or 28 if he didnt have to run a hurry up offense and throw the pick at the end because of it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DukeNukeEm Posted January 27, 2006 Share Posted January 27, 2006 I dont want this to get into a whole long argument... but we would of lost the first game and would of been blown out if our defense played like they did in the playoffs during our 1st match with the Panthers.... on that game Orton had 2 short scoring drives thanks to the defense and one scoring drive of his own(3 points)..... Grossman led us to 21 points without any help from the defense.... also prob would of been 24 or 28 if he didnt have to run a hurry up offense and throw the pick at the end because of it. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Â Â Im not getting into it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.