February 7, 200620 yr Scarlett looks a bit thick to me.. http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b51/acks..._FAIR_NUDES.jpg (AP) This photo supplied by Vanity Fair shows Scarlett Johansson, foreground, and Keira Knightley posed... Full Image NEW YORK (AP) - With award season still under way, Scarlett Johansson and Keira Knightley are exchanging ballgowns for birthday suits. Under the artful eye of photographer Annie Leibovitz, the starlets posed nude for the cover of Vanity Fair magazine's yearly Hollywood issue, to be released Wednesday. Fashion superstar Tom Ford also appears on the cover photo, though he stuck with a more traditional suit - one of black fabric. Ford, the issue's guest art director, said he hadn't planned on becoming part of his own project, but he stepped in when "Wedding Crashers" star Rachel McAdams, 29, backed out. "She did want to do it, and then when she was on the set I think she felt uncomfortable, and I didn't want to make anybody feel uncomfortable" Ford said Tuesday on ABC's "Good Morning America." Other Hollywood stars weren't difficult to persuade, Ford said. "A lot of women actually, a couple of men, too, wanted to take their clothes off," he said. "These are such beautiful people, beautiful women, and who doesn't want to see a bit of them." Angelina Jolie also got naked for the Hollywood issue, posing in a bathtub. Another shot depicts a fully clothed George Clooney as a director filming a large cast of women wearing skin-tone underwear. For the cover photo, Knightley, 20, was photographed sitting sideways, with legs and arms carefully placed. The 21-year-old Johansson, draped over Ford's leg, is somewhat more exposed - readers who open the fold-out cover will see her bare buttocks. Knightley is currently nominated for a best actress Oscar for her performance in "Pride & Prejudice." Johansson co-starred this year in Woody Allen's "Match Point."
February 7, 200620 yr Scarlett looks a bit thick to me.. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Nah, she's perfect. That other chick could use a steak though.
February 7, 200620 yr QUOTE(SSH2005 @ Feb 7, 2006 -> 10:05 AM) Nah, she's perfect. That other chick could use a steak though. A Tube steak?
February 7, 200620 yr QUOTE(Steff @ Feb 7, 2006 -> 11:02 AM) Scarlett looks a bit thick to me.. http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b51/acks..._FAIR_NUDES.jpg (AP) This photo supplied by Vanity Fair shows Scarlett Johansson, foreground, and Keira Knightley posed... Full Image NEW YORK (AP) - With award season still under way, Scarlett Johansson and Keira Knightley are exchanging ballgowns for birthday suits. Under the artful eye of photographer Annie Leibovitz, the starlets posed nude for the cover of Vanity Fair magazine's yearly Hollywood issue, to be released Wednesday. Fashion superstar Tom Ford also appears on the cover photo, though he stuck with a more traditional suit - one of black fabric. Ford, the issue's guest art director, said he hadn't planned on becoming part of his own project, but he stepped in when "Wedding Crashers" star Rachel McAdams, 29, backed out. "She did want to do it, and then when she was on the set I think she felt uncomfortable, and I didn't want to make anybody feel uncomfortable" Ford said Tuesday on ABC's "Good Morning America." Other Hollywood stars weren't difficult to persuade, Ford said. "A lot of women actually, a couple of men, too, wanted to take their clothes off," he said. "These are such beautiful people, beautiful women, and who doesn't want to see a bit of them." Angelina Jolie also got naked for the Hollywood issue, posing in a bathtub. Another shot depicts a fully clothed George Clooney as a director filming a large cast of women wearing skin-tone underwear. For the cover photo, Knightley, 20, was photographed sitting sideways, with legs and arms carefully placed. The 21-year-old Johansson, draped over Ford's leg, is somewhat more exposed - readers who open the fold-out cover will see her bare buttocks. Knightley is currently nominated for a best actress Oscar for her performance in "Pride & Prejudice." Johansson co-starred this year in Woody Allen's "Match Point." Scarlett looks porcelain to me. But not too thick. Keira Knightley doesnt need to be showing off her ribs like that though
February 7, 200620 yr QUOTE(RockRaines @ Feb 7, 2006 -> 11:45 AM) Rachel McAdams would have made the shoot better. Rachel McAdams has to be the most overrated "it" girl now. Just doesnt do it for me.
February 7, 200620 yr QUOTE(kyyle23 @ Feb 7, 2006 -> 10:16 AM) Scarlett looks porcelain to me. But not too thick. Keira Knightley doesnt need to be showing off her ribs like that though I agree on both counts. Scarlett needs a tan and Keira needs a months worth of BurgerKing Cheeseburgers. PS: TO all your Score fans, anyone notice my new signature?
February 7, 200620 yr Scarlett can use a serious TAN. I don't think she's too thick, but she could use more definition, especially in the calves. Those are almost 'cankles'.
February 7, 200620 yr Author QUOTE(kyyle23 @ Feb 7, 2006 -> 10:16 AM) Scarlett looks porcelain to me. But not too thick. Keira Knightley doesnt need to be showing off her ribs like that though Her legs look like logs. Apparently the gym is not her friend. Wouldn't take much at her age to get some definition...
February 7, 200620 yr QUOTE(kyyle23 @ Feb 7, 2006 -> 10:49 AM) Rachel McAdams has to be the most overrated "it" girl now. Just doesnt do it for me. Rachel Mcadams, Tennage girls. Who DOES do it for you?
February 7, 200620 yr QUOTE(RockRaines @ Feb 7, 2006 -> 12:07 PM) Rachel Mcadams, Tennage girls. Who DOES do it for you? Im not THAT picky. Rachel McAdams has a serious problem called "Fo'head Mo-lody" More Forehead than Body.
February 7, 200620 yr I wish MORE girls in Hollywood looked like Scarlett vs Knightley. Its not natural or healthy.
February 7, 200620 yr Author QUOTE(SleepyWhiteSox @ Feb 7, 2006 -> 11:54 AM) I know, I know... it's a personal pref. I don't think she looks bad.. but I think she could tone up her lower half a lot.
February 7, 200620 yr Scarlett always looks quite tasty if you ask me. She's also looks a lot shorter than I thought. Short chicks=
February 7, 200620 yr Author QUOTE(southsider2k5 @ Feb 7, 2006 -> 12:07 PM) I wish MORE girls in Hollywood looked like Scarlett vs Knightley. Its not natural or healthy. And weight is not a cookie cutter measurement.
February 7, 200620 yr QUOTE(Steff @ Feb 7, 2006 -> 12:10 PM) And weight is not a cookie cutter measurement. Doesn't matter to me. Scarlett or Kiera. I'd give either of them the best 10 seconds of my life!
February 7, 200620 yr QUOTE(Steff @ Feb 7, 2006 -> 01:09 PM) I know, I know... it's a personal pref. I don't think she looks bad.. but I think she could tone up her lower half a lot. I agree with this, but those lips....oooohhhh those lips.
February 7, 200620 yr Doesn't matter to me. Scarlett or Kiera. I'd give either of them the best 10 seconds of my life! <{POST_SNAPBACK}> You're such a stud! By the way, Adriana Lima blows both of these women away. Edited February 7, 200620 yr by SSH2005
February 7, 200620 yr i like the weight of scarlett...but i also like knightly...if your hot you are hot...Get rid of that dude thou
February 8, 200620 yr Scarlett is well, Scarlett. I would drink her bath water. That is all. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I would eat her toe jam and belly button lint. Sorry, I had to try to top you. Edited February 8, 200620 yr by SSH2005
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.