HuskyCaucasian Posted January 5, 2011 Share Posted January 5, 2011 QUOTE (PlaySumFnJurny @ Jan 5, 2011 -> 02:02 PM) I'm hoping to go then as well. I was there once before, but was too young to remember it all. I went in 6th grade i think. I dont remember much at all. My wife and i try to do a "state" vacation every year where we pick a state and visit places throughout. I just talked to her and she's ok with NY in 2014. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HuskyCaucasian Posted January 5, 2011 Share Posted January 5, 2011 (edited) QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Jan 5, 2011 -> 01:59 PM) The players who got sustaining level votes: Coming onto the ballot (according to Baseball Reference) Bernie Williams Vinny Castilla Javy Lopez Ruben Sierra Jeff Nelson Jeromy Burnitz Tim Salmon Mike Matheny Edgardo Alfonzo Danny Graves Tony Womack Scott Erickson Jeff Fassero Phil Nevin Carl Everett Brian Jordan Eric Young Tim Worrell Bill Mueller Joe Randa Matt Lawton Terry Mulholland Jose Lima Brad Radke Rick Helling Felix Rodriguez Mike Remlinger Edited January 5, 2011 by Athomeboy_2000 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted January 5, 2011 Share Posted January 5, 2011 QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Jan 5, 2011 -> 02:59 PM) OK ESPN has the list up now... Baines got 28 votes, which I believe is 4.82%. So, he now drops off the list.  The players who got sustaining level votes:  Roberto Alomar 523 90.0 Bert Blyleven 463 79.7 Barry Larkin 361 62.1 Jack Morris 311 53.5 Lee Smith 263 45.3 Jeff Bagwell 242 41.7 Tim Raines 218 37.5 Edgar Martinez 191 32.9 Alan Trammell 141 24.3 Larry Walker 118 20.3 Mark McGwire 115 19.8 Fred McGriff 104 17.9 Dave Parker 89 15.3 Don Mattingly 79 13.6 Dale Murphy 73 12.6 Rafael Palmeiro 64 11.0 I think McGwire went down from last year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HuskyCaucasian Posted January 5, 2011 Share Posted January 5, 2011 QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Jan 5, 2011 -> 02:27 PM) I think McGwire went down from last year. 2007: 23.5% 2008: 23.6% 2009: 21.9% 2010: 23.7% 2011: 19.8% Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted January 5, 2011 Author Share Posted January 5, 2011 And Alomar getting 90% this year just proves what a f***ing joke his not making it last year actually was. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted January 5, 2011 Share Posted January 5, 2011 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Jan 5, 2011 -> 03:40 PM) And Alomar getting 90% this year just proves what a f***ing joke his not making it last year actually was. Bah, I can live with HOF voters making a "Bad behavior" statement. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harry Chappas Posted January 5, 2011 Share Posted January 5, 2011 LIMA TIME!!!! Isn't he dead? Â I hope Dale Murphy and Jack Morris make it. I love 80's baseball. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted January 5, 2011 Author Share Posted January 5, 2011 QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Jan 5, 2011 -> 02:41 PM) Bah, I can live with HOF voters making a "Bad behavior" statement. Â Then don't vote him in at all. If it is worth holding up a HOF vote, then do it. A one year thing is just stupid. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiSox_Sonix Posted January 5, 2011 Share Posted January 5, 2011 QUOTE (PlaySumFnJurny @ Jan 5, 2011 -> 03:02 PM) I'm hoping to go then as well. I was there once before, but was too young to remember it all. Â Â QUOTE (Athomeboy_2000 @ Jan 5, 2011 -> 03:04 PM) I went in 6th grade i think. I dont remember much at all. My wife and i try to do a "state" vacation every year where we pick a state and visit places throughout. I just talked to her and she's ok with NY in 2014. Â I always take for granted the fact that this is the case with most people. I've been fortunate enough to visit Cooperstown numerous times since I grew up and went to college in upstate NY. I even had the opportunity to present my senior thesis at the annual symposium there a few years back. Regardless, I'm absolutely going to be there in 2014 to see Frank get in. Just a word of advice in advance, book your hotel the day he gets in because those places fill up FAST. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rowand44 Posted January 5, 2011 Share Posted January 5, 2011 Both well deserved. Alomar not making it last year is still one of the biggest jokes of all time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milkman delivers Posted January 5, 2011 Share Posted January 5, 2011 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Jan 5, 2011 -> 03:40 PM) And Alomar getting 90% this year just proves what a f***ing joke his not making it last year actually was. Â Whoa, I thought you were going in the completely opposite direction halfway through that sentence. I was about to flip out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WCSox Posted January 5, 2011 Share Posted January 5, 2011 QUOTE (Milkman delivers @ Jan 5, 2011 -> 11:15 AM) And Alomar was a shoo-in, as he's probably (and in my opinion, definitely) the greatest 2B of all time. Â I'd take Joe Morgan. But, yeah, Alomar is right up there with him. Probably the best 2B of our generation. Â Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milkman delivers Posted January 5, 2011 Share Posted January 5, 2011 QUOTE (WCSox @ Jan 5, 2011 -> 04:49 PM) I'd take Joe Morgan. But, yeah, Alomar is right up there with him. Probably the best 2B of our generation. Â I bet Joe Morgan would take Joe Morgan, too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WCSox Posted January 5, 2011 Share Posted January 5, 2011 QUOTE (Milkman delivers @ Jan 5, 2011 -> 01:50 PM) I bet Joe Morgan would take Joe Morgan, too. Â Right after he found something to complain about. Can't stand him in the booth. Â Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Hurtin Posted January 5, 2011 Share Posted January 5, 2011 "About f***ing time" Blyleven Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jordan4life_2007 Posted January 5, 2011 Share Posted January 5, 2011 (edited) Roberto Alomar was one of the 5 best players I've ever seen. And Bagwell not getting in pretty much confirms that there's no way Frank is getting in on the first ballot. I know he's got the 500 HRs. But they'll definitely use the fact he was a DH for most of those against him. Edited January 5, 2011 by Jordan4life Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SoxFan562004 Posted January 5, 2011 Share Posted January 5, 2011 (edited) QUOTE (Jordan4life @ Jan 5, 2011 -> 04:38 PM) Roberto Alomar was one of the 5 best players I've ever seen. And Bagwell not getting in pretty much confirms that there's no way Frank is getting in on the first ballot. I know he's got the 500 HRs. But they'll definitely use the fact he was a DH for most of those against him. there's a chance he gets in 1st ballot if enough voters have decided he will be the golden example of a guy they think didn't juice during the era and reward him for it, but yes, I think he'll wait a year and it will be strictly "punishment" for being a DH so long, even though during his crazy first seven years he played a good amount of 1b... Â How do you guys think A-Rod will eventually be handled? 1st ballot, one year "punishment" from writers or long time to get in? Edited January 5, 2011 by SoxFan562004 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WCSox Posted January 5, 2011 Share Posted January 5, 2011 QUOTE (Jordan4life @ Jan 5, 2011 -> 02:38 PM) And Bagwell not getting in pretty much confirms that there's no way Frank is getting in on the first ballot. I know he's got the 500 HRs. But they'll definitely use the fact he was a DH for most of those against him. Â Bagwell was arguably not as dominant as Frank was in his prime. Frank has more MVPs, more finishes in the Top 5 in MVP voting, and a batting title. Not to mention that he played longer and has better overall numbers as well. I think there's a good chance that Frank does get in on the first ballot. Â Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shago Posted January 5, 2011 Share Posted January 5, 2011 QUOTE (The Ginger Kid @ Jan 5, 2011 -> 02:44 PM) I'm happy for Blylevin, but Morris was every bit his superior, IMO ^^^ Absolutely this ^^^  Jack Morris was THE dominant AL starter from the 80s. More importantly, Burt just getting the love because he's been campaigning as a member of the media and is viewed as Mr. Nice Guy. Lame  Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleHurt05 Posted January 5, 2011 Share Posted January 5, 2011 QUOTE (Jordan4life @ Jan 5, 2011 -> 04:38 PM) Roberto Alomar was one of the 5 best players I've ever seen. And Bagwell not getting in pretty much confirms that there's no way Frank is getting in on the first ballot. I know he's got the 500 HRs. But they'll definitely use the fact he was a DH for most of those against him. Â Frank & Bagwell are a bit different because of the PED issue. IMO, I think people aren't sure about Bagwell because they think he may have juiced. I know he was never connected a single steroid allegation, but due to his size, power, and the era he played in, I think voters may have questioned him. Frank obviously was the loudest speaker against steroids the whole time, so if there is anyone who can be assumed close to 100% clean, it is him. Â Â Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jordan4life_2007 Posted January 5, 2011 Share Posted January 5, 2011 QUOTE (WCSox @ Jan 5, 2011 -> 05:03 PM) Bagwell was arguably not as dominant as Frank was in his prime. Frank has more MVPs, more finishes in the Top 5 in MVP voting, and a batting title. Not to mention that he played longer and has better overall numbers as well. I think there's a good chance that Frank does get in on the first ballot. Â Oh I agree. But Bagwell played the field. Frank didn't most of his career. I think that's going to play a big role. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CrimsonWeltall Posted January 5, 2011 Share Posted January 5, 2011 QUOTE (La Marr Hoyt HOF @ Jan 5, 2011 -> 11:20 PM) ^^^ Absolutely this ^^^ Jack Morris was THE dominant AL starter from the 80s. More importantly, Burt just getting the love because he's been campaigning as a member of the media and is viewed as Mr. Nice Guy. Lame  Being too young to remember 80s baseball well, if Jack Morris was THE dominant AL starter, why are his numbers so mediocre? A career ERA+ of only 105? Yikes. It's not like he has a bunch of monster Koufax/Pedro seasons mixed in there either. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southsider2k5 Posted January 5, 2011 Author Share Posted January 5, 2011 QUOTE (WCSox @ Jan 5, 2011 -> 05:03 PM) Bagwell was arguably not as dominant as Frank was in his prime. Frank has more MVPs, more finishes in the Top 5 in MVP voting, and a batting title. Not to mention that he played longer and has better overall numbers as well. I think there's a good chance that Frank does get in on the first ballot. Â People are convinced Bagwell juiced. I don't know why, but they are. That seems to be holding him back somewhat. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Balta1701 Posted January 5, 2011 Share Posted January 5, 2011 QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ Jan 5, 2011 -> 06:32 PM) People are convinced Bagwell juiced. I don't know why, but they are. That seems to be holding him back somewhat. I believe at least 1 reporter did accuse him of being a user a few years ago. Â To be honest though, this is one case where having the full official name list from the 2003 tests could really help a player, if he's not on it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paint it Black Posted January 6, 2011 Share Posted January 6, 2011 QUOTE (The Ginger Kid @ Jan 5, 2011 -> 01:44 PM) I'm happy for Blylevin, but Morris was every bit his superior, IMO Why? I'm still waiting for ANYONE to make a case for Morris that doesn't involve intangibles. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.