Jump to content

Surkamp to LA Dodgers


flavum
 Share

Recommended Posts

QUOTE (fathom @ May 22, 2015 -> 05:10 PM)
Blake Smith was on same AFL roster in 2014 as the Sox guys.

The dude didn't get a hit in all of 2014. That's gotta be some sort of record or something.

Edited by hi8is
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (flavum @ May 22, 2015 -> 07:53 PM)
3 plate appearances is a pretty small sample size.

 

He's a pitcher.

Ha - duh. I was looking at the games column as if it was the ab column. No wonder it was confusing. Can I have the daily idiot award please?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (hi8is @ May 22, 2015 -> 11:27 PM)
Ha - duh. I was looking at the games column as if it was the ab column. No wonder it was confusing. Can I have the daily idiot award please?

No idiot award for you because you did not know this...

 

"Smith, also 27, had been working at Double-A for the L.A. organization. Only recently converted from an outfielder to a reliever, Smith has racked up 16 2/3 innings of 1.62 ERA ball with 8.6 K/9 against 4.9 BB/9 this year in Tulsa."

 

http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/chicago-white-sox

 

:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Stupid trade. Surkamp had really nice AAA numbers that indicated he had an outside shot of being a 5th starter (I'm aware of and largely disagree with the 4A phenomenon), and he had the floor of being a vaguely acceptable bullpen mop-up guy. We get a guy who probably has that as his ceiling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (raBBit @ May 25, 2015 -> 06:22 PM)
I was definitely one of Surkamp's bigger fans but I think it's silly to make any judgement on the return. Unless you saw something I didn't there's next to no information on Smith as a pitcher. Surkamp's ceiling was very limited, who knows what Smith's is.

Okay, fair enough, probably just frustrated with the org in general right now and already felt they were wasting Surkamp as it was. But still, this guy actually has very consistent numbers from 2013 to 2015 (and even going back to his pitching in college), strikes out an okay amount and walks too many. Prepared to be wrong but I'd take what I think Surkamp is over what I think he probably is any day. The Dodgers are a smart org.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (raBBit @ May 25, 2015 -> 06:22 PM)
I was definitely one of Surkamp's bigger fans but I think it's silly to make any judgement on the return. Unless you saw something I didn't there's next to no information on Smith as a pitcher. Surkamp's ceiling was very limited, who knows what Smith's is.

At best Smith's a bullpen pitcher. Most likely an org guy.

Sox have Noesi, Carrol, and Danks taking up space. Should try some of these AAA guys.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE (GreenSox @ May 25, 2015 -> 06:37 PM)
At best Smith's a bullpen pitcher. Most likely an org guy.

Sox have Noesi, Carrol, and Danks taking up space. Should try some of these AAA guys.

Yep, I would have been all up for giving Guerra and Surkamp the role those guys have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...