Jump to content

Colon named AL Cy Young winner


Sox Pride 22
 Share

Recommended Posts

Yeah, we'll get no awards but will have won the World Series...no bias against us. Obviously I expected Colon to get it and he should have. But no gold gloves, no cy young, no executive of the year....NOTHING...oh, except the most important one...

 

im_ws_trophy.jpg

Edited by tonyho7476
Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(Steff @ Nov 8, 2005 -> 02:36 PM)
Is Exec of Year even a MLB award...???

 

Now.. stepping back.. I don't see anyone that won anything not deserving of it - yes, even Hunter.

 

Not sure on Exec of the year...but come on, the guy rehabbed the whole team this off-season and won the world series. Cleveland made pretty much no moves in the off-season...and fell on their face at the end. I don't understand these people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(tonyho7476 @ Nov 8, 2005 -> 01:39 PM)
Not sure on Exec of the year...but come on, the guy rehabbed the whole team this off-season and won the world series.  Cleveland made pretty much no moves in the off-season...and fell on their face at the end.  I don't understand these people.

 

 

 

Who cares... :huh

 

 

 

:P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(Steff @ Nov 8, 2005 -> 01:36 PM)
Is Exec of Year even a MLB award...???

 

Now.. stepping back.. I don't see anyone that won anything not deserving of it - yes, even Hunter.

I'm not one to b**** about individual awards because I just don't care all that much. But Torii Hunter in no way, shape or form deserved to win a GG this year. He won it strickly based on reputation when a guy like Mark Kotsay who had a much better defenive season and played 41 more games than Hunter gets shafted. The GG has been a joke since '99 but that's no excuse to continuously f*** over deserving players.

Edited by Kalapse
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why did Cliff lee get more votes then Mark? I know he had to more wins, but Mark had a better ERA...312 to 3.79

More innings pitched 236 to 202 and was on a division winner..What's the thought process behind that.

 

Even Garland should have been voter higher..had the same amount of wins..better ERA and more innings pitched..

 

Man, people have a real hard on for the Indians..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

QUOTE(GASHWOUND @ Nov 8, 2005 -> 12:19 PM)
Why did Cliff lee get more votes then Mark? I know he had to more wins, but Mark had a better ERA...312 to 3.79

More innings pitched 236 to 202 and was on a division winner..What's the thought process behind that.

 

Even Garland should have been voter higher..had the same amount of wins..better ERA and more innings pitched..

 

Man, people have a real hard on for the Indians..

What were the numbers for Buehrle + Garland?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...