Chisoxmb35

The hot takes on WCJr here are freaking Gold lol. Fyi, WCJ has shown more than enough talent to be excited about. Please post this type of thing on any respectable NBA or Bulls message board to find how awful that take actually is. Good grief.

That is demonstrably false and you know that. Had we given either of them the money, they would have signed here, period. It's about the money, don't use too much energy trying to make it something it really isn't.

Your last two posts are "hot takes" on another level. Also, completely, irrefutably, false. I know it sucks we look like buffoons.. but let's not do the whole revisionist history thing.

It's a moot point, not mute. Not important, but that one always bugs me lol.

The Sox are not moving anywhere, ever (barring existential interference).

That's not a problem. The only reason one would even say it is is because we suck. If we were good we wouldn't have to care or even think about being a "tourist site" because the fans would come (as has been historically proven time and time again with this franchise). We don't have to ape the schtick of the Cubs to be a successful draw, that's just silly.

I sincerely hope that that's sarcasm..

The Sox are never leaving Chicago. Jesus Christ that's the lamest go to line for those who are unhappy with the current state of events.. it's so damn cringe.

Omg..the legend of Shoota lives on ?! Us old heads remember.

I love me some bad arm-chair GM'ing!

Go home Roger.

Your posts make this board hard to read to be honest. It's sad.

He hit you with the laugh emoji, but you dropped facts and are 100% correct.

No, no they shouldn't.

Contention for me is the playoffs and the potential to win a series or two. Contention for me is not winning 80 games and "contending" for the division title simply because the rest of the division is bad or not ready to contend.

Yes 2025 does matter. And I don't think the Sox are close to contending in 2020 so I think the question to ask is "Does 2020 really matter?"

You get a pretty accurate picture of who is reacting and how based on the post content and participation in a given thread lol.

No. I'm saying that that question, in this thread, reeks of trying to get people even more riled up. Trading away Moncada is in itself not something that is any way realistic considering the circumstances. Even less so based on the fact that we would get nowhere near the return we sent out to trade for him in the first place. That being said..I realllly hope you were just being facetious to lighten the mood up in here a bit. That would make a lot more sense than actually bringing up the notion of trading Moncada right now.

This thread..ugh. Give it a rest.

No of course not, just like there's no chance that Moncada will be as good as Kyle is defensively now. That's how this works right?

Who cares? That's such a loaded question in light of this thread and the path it has taken down into the shitter. I don't understand the point of the question other than to incite posters here even further about this admittedly touchy subject.

Refer to his other posts and you would see a running theme of negative connotations. It is what is I guess.

Uhh "positively quoted" stats of 2 random players to comparatively say that the actual player being discussed is not as good as said players (and implying he never will be). If it ain't doom and gloom, it's being a pessimist to the fucking extreme for no reason.

It's like.. you don't know how any of this stuff works and just like to complain about the FO. My goodness ?.

Don't confuse your confirmation bias with reality sir. Andrew was ahead of Moncada developmentally, already producing for the Big League club and never actually on the table in a trade. Obfuscation of the facts is disingenuous and doesn't add to the discussion to be honest.