aboz56

Just saw a mention of it on MLB.com. Anyone else have any details? I know Jas was planning on going to the game so he can probably offer some insight once he gets back from the game.

QUOTE(Allsox @ May 2, 2006 -> 06:24 PM) All I expected from Brian was to play a solid CF while he gets his feet wet in the majors. So far, the defense has been superb and it shouldn't be a shock to ANYONE that he's struggling at the plate. Why people seem so surprised at his offensive numbers is beyond me considering he's hitting 9TH! It's not like he's supposed to be putting up 3, 4 or 5 slot numbers on this team. Is he bad now? Yes. Was he supposed hit like Thome or Konerko? NO! Give the kid time and he'll be alright. It's not like he's struggling on purpose so give the kid a break. .140 is not acceptable, I don't care where he is hitting in the lineup. His feet are not getting wet, his approach is simply awful.

QUOTE(greasywheels121 @ May 2, 2006 -> 06:06 PM) I simply believe you're just expecting too much. As I said earlier, I've never seen a team have the complete package at the major league and minor league levels. And I don't believe the Sox will be the first. Hence, this argument will be cyclical and never-ending. So I'm moving on. Hey you know I respect your opinion as much as anyone. I think you make excellent points. I also think for all that I criticize I also give the Sox credit where credit is due. I don't go out of my way to expect too much or rip for no reason. I pretty much tell it like it is for the most part (except for Buehrle who I refuse to rip.)

QUOTE(southsideirish71 @ May 2, 2006 -> 06:08 PM) Aboz I would say that if any of our prospects doesnt have a long and looping swing in our system its Sweeney. Well he may have his shot because I guarantee that if Anderson is hitting under .200 come June, this won't be tolerated.

QUOTE(WHarris1 @ May 2, 2006 -> 06:06 PM) So did the Cubs, Indians, Dodgers, Twins, and others You don't draft a left handed relief pitcher in the first round. Bottom line. That was an awful move by the Sox. I don't care who else passed over him, that's beside the point.

QUOTE(greasywheels121 @ May 2, 2006 -> 05:59 PM) I have no problem criticizing players/the team. However, the standards you two have are f***ing impossible. There is no such thing as a dynasty with a farm system consiting of the Yankees, Red Sox, and Cardinals. Hey, I call it like it is. Our farm system and development recently deserves criticism. The argument can easily be made with how many of our top prospects have become busts. Its frustrating that all of these can't miss guys usually end up giving us relatively nothing.

Also, of note in regards to Anderson, Charlotte has been giving Sweeney some time in CF recently.

QUOTE(greasywheels121 @ May 2, 2006 -> 05:54 PM) Honestly, it sounds like you and Flash want the following: An all-star caliber team at the major league level winning multiple World Series, to the point that farm is insignificant. However, the insiginificant farm must be damn good. That makes no sense and is not even close to realistic. I never said anything about an all-star caliber team winning multiple World Series. What I want is better drafting and development. Royce Ring a few years ago was awful. We passed over Joe Blanton for that guy and Billy Beane still rags on the Sox for that move. And most of our first round picks have been awful.

One thing that really is funny to me is those who think the Sox are above criticism just because they won the World Series. It's not like we are any less of a fan for questioning certain things. If everyone were just ho-hum about everything the organzation does and just praised them, what fun would that be? It would also give them no incentive to constantly improve. Like it or not, most fans will never truly be satisfied and rightfully so.

QUOTE(WHarris1 @ May 2, 2006 -> 05:52 PM) What exactly is that supposed to mean? I hope BA doesn't end up like Francouer I'd take Francouer over BA 100 out of 100 times.

QUOTE(greasywheels121 @ May 2, 2006 -> 05:48 PM) Name me a team in the modern era that has won multiple World Series, while maintaining a solid farm. Name another team in the majors who hasn't had a single number one pick in the last 14 years make a solid contribution at some point to their big league club. Since 1992, besides Kip Wells in 1998, the Sox have pretty much struck out in terms of first round picks. And they gave up on Wells after a few seasons. Is this coincidence or poor scouting and player development?

QUOTE(fathom @ May 2, 2006 -> 05:45 PM) I honestly can't "fathom" how Anderson's going to be a solid hitter with his current swing. It's so ugly. If you didn't know better, you'd think it was a pitcher batting some of the time. Until he improves his plate discipline, he's not going to hit any better. His swing is ugly and he's ALWAYS behind in the count. Pitchers are just pounding strike one and strike two in there because he either takes a pitch or fouls it off.

QUOTE(greasywheels121 @ May 2, 2006 -> 05:39 PM) I just find it funny that you criticize the system, because it's a new thing for you. It was always b****ing about the talent that we had the major league level in the past, because KW was an awful GM and we never had what you wanted/thought we needed. And now that we won the WS, you can't exactly harp on that anymore. So you've moved on to "bigger and better things." :rolly While I usually agree with you, I gotta agree with Flash on this. In the past, pre offseason 2005, there was reason to criticize KW, he made some bonehead moves. Even he would admit that. But he did a great job acquiring talent for the 2005 run and I think even Flash would give him credit for that. But one World Series doesn't cover up the Sox shortcomings as it regards to their farm system. He is right on to criticize the White Sox farm system. Their failure to produce contributing first round picks over the last 10 years cannot be denied. He is right to criticize Anderson. The guy is in the major leagues and this is not a time to learn on the job. We are competing for another division title and we need everyone to contribute to reach the goal again. If Anderson can't hang long term, he'll be demoted.

Low risk, possibly a decent reward signing. I like it.

I'm willing to give him until the end of May to figure things out at the plate. If he's not hitting above .240 or so by then, it'll be time to make a move. Love his D by the way.

Forget a suspension, ban him from the league. Not cool at all.

QUOTE(Chisoxfn @ May 1, 2006 -> 05:03 PM) I'm thinking more along the lines of 3 yr 12 mill with some potential incentives. In arbitration next year he could easily get 4/5 million, so there's no way he'd take that deal. I'd say 3/18 would be what it would take to get it done. If you listen to any of the away announcers in the AL, which I do a lot being out of market like you, you'll notice that pretty much every announcing team refers to Crede as being one of the top 3B in the AL. Word is definitely finally getting around on Crede after the playoffs last year.

I'd give him a similar deal to AJ, but more like 3 years and 18 mil, but nothing more at this point. I think a deal like that could happen after the season, IF he is serious about not letting his agent (Scotty Bor-ass) get in the way of a deal. I believe we do control his rights through the 2007 season.

QUOTE(Sox1422 @ May 1, 2006 -> 03:07 PM) My girlfriend said the same thing a couple of months ago when she first saw him. I think Anderson looks like the kid from the Incredibles. Dash, I think?

Got a 16x20 of that memorable moment signed by Pods himself, custom framed and hanging in my room. Probably my 2nd favorite piece of Sox memorabilia behind my signed Buehrle jersey. Also, of note, for those who collect memorabilia. Steinersports.com has a ton of Sox stuff from last season discounted. I usually refuse to buy memorabilia, but for those who do, here is a nice link: http://www.steinersports.com/ssm/control/k...ite+Sox&x=0&y=0

Oh how funny it could be when the Bulls bounce Miami in the first round and the Lakers find themselves in the Western finals. Its looking like it will be Clippers and Lakers second round.

Kobe haters, bow down, that's all I can say.

QUOTE(AddisonStSox @ Apr 27, 2006 -> 09:10 PM) Thank you. I have since identified two grammatical errors, but, I believe the point remains. I did not include anything else. I did not include the names of specific employees--although I do believe I may be able to replicate names if need be--or specific interactions. As I've said, this was my first dealing with something like this and I felt going in that if I detailed a certain scenario or singled out a single happening, my larger point may have gone over-looked or, more fittingly, under-estimated. Is detail--of lack thereof--a problem, AB? Who knows, I've never done anything like that either. My only thinking is that one specific incident, with times, details, names, anything pertinent to the incident....would drive your point home even stronger. Other than that I think you did a great job and hopefully you are at least contacted regarding your letter.

Well-written, did you include anything else in more detail? I've never dealt with them at all, but I'd be interested to hear how this turns out. Keep us posted.