santo=dorf

QUOTE(Gene Honda Civic @ Jul 24, 2006 -> 09:13 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> No. Punto reached via FC. Well I don't get the rule entirely because Neal was responsible during Punto's at-bat.

Nice Effort there Pods!

QUOTE(atrain081 @ Jul 24, 2006 -> 09:07 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Javy's line: 6.0 IP, 8 H, 5 ER looks familiar Shouldn't that be 4 ER? Punto was Neal's runner.

QUOTE(rudylaw @ Jul 24, 2006 -> 09:05 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Neal has allowed every inherited runner to score lately. We have no business playing in the post season this year. We suck. There is no disputing that fact. Well technically Neal didn't allow Tyner to score.

WOW. Son of a beach. I thought we were going to get out of this for sure. Ozzie, please start living up to your about Vazquez and pulling him before the big inning. That's Cotts' 7 HR allowed this year. Last year he allowed one in a blowout during a Scrubs-Sox game.

That wasn't a strike?

So is "focking" still cool to use? Why doesn't the hit and run ever work for us? Ozzie claimed he would pull Vazquez if he was in a situation where he might give up the lead. I remember him saying it during the second Cubs series, and he hasn't enforced it once.

QUOTE(Melissa1334 @ Jul 24, 2006 -> 08:39 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> can some1 please explain to me why the f" ozzie let javy pitch to justin after that homer(cotts was ready)...and countinues to let him pitch....we all saw this coming. I was the 6th inning with one out, he was somewhere close to 80 pitches, and the White Sox are already short a reliever in the pen. Clear?

Still a quality start, and he's only thrown 80+ pitches.

Son of a beach. Is AJ setting up too early? It looked like he was setting camp way early on Cuddyer.

Ah spiff. And I benched Cuddyer today.

QUOTE(Sox It To Em @ Jul 24, 2006 -> 07:39 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Javier is getting squeezed. Laz Diaz is not a good umpire. Outside = strike a little bit high = ball

QUOTE(Melissa1334 @ Jul 24, 2006 -> 05:32 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> damn that means we are stuck with javy He's better than your man Freddy. YTMND of this move (Brother made it.) Can anyone tell me some more about Dan Cortes besides the TV show he used to host on MTV?

QUOTE(CySox @ Jul 24, 2006 -> 01:32 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> haven't you all ever heard of spell checker? Yes. Have you? Spell checker won't catch the improper use of "your" or "you're" either.

What's Bowden's choice of Beer? Is he a Whisky man?

QUOTE(TheHolyBovine @ Jul 24, 2006 -> 04:42 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> UPDATE: KW was interviewed by Dibble and Kennedy on XM's "The Show", and said that there's no way that any pitcher off of the major league roster will be traded before the deadline. He said that he told BMac personally that he's not going anywhere. "Brandon McCarthy is part of our present and future. He's not going anywhere." But positional players are fair game right? I say everyone on the 25 except for Garcia, Pods, Uribe and Gload (I know nobody really has a use for him) and Sweeney are my only untouchables. Get me Soriano and/or Tejada plz

QUOTE(Flash Tizzle @ Jul 24, 2006 -> 04:32 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> No, but there's more of a guarantee involving the production of certain minor league pitchers. Every season there's players you look at and know they'll produce. How often does a team have that guarantee with winning a world series? MacDougal helps us more now, and perhaps the next two, but what about the following seven to nine with Lumsden? There's nothing wrong with thinking about winning now and preserving your team in the future. I like the idea of sustaining success with a strong group of minor leaguers capable of replacing current players. If MacDougal didn't have injury concerns and Kansas City weren't in the division I'd be less reluctant to criticize the move. I'd love to see the ratio of minor league pitchers who made it to the big show to the number who flopped and compare it to the number of defending world champs to make the playoffs the next year to the number of teams who stay home in October. I'm willing to bet that second ratio is A TON greater than the first ratio Flash. Especially when you toss in the new divisional format and the fact Tyler had injury problems costing him his first pro season. :rolly

QUOTE(rcpweiner @ Jul 24, 2006 -> 03:56 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Uh. If we're following the 2004 Red Sox line of thinking, I'm fine with that. You know, since they won the World Series and all ... BUT THEIR FARM SYSTEM!!! Jesus Flash, give it a rest already. I'll say it right now. Trade every damn prospect on the farm right now if it gets us another title or a shot at the World Series Oh I forgot. World Series aren't guaranteed like minor league pitching prospects. :rolly

QUOTE(CySox @ Jul 24, 2006 -> 12:04 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> I did, where? Anyway. I don't pay too much attention to what I write on a message board. "I am you are guy." You should start paying more attention to this common mistake if you were to become a writer.

QUOTE(minors @ Jul 24, 2006 -> 12:00 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Yeah You keep believing that snato when is the last time they represented a christian who is being discriminated against or a gun owner who rights are being violated. It seems like all you can do is use personal attacks against someone. Lawyers and the ACLU aren't cowards just the people they defend. I am sure glad you stand for these cowards who protest at the funerals of our fallen soldiers. Quit trying to use your twisted, narrow logic on me. Don't lump me in with those nut-job christians because I said the ACLU is defending their constitutional right. In America, you can protest whatever you want on public property. You can protest anti-war, non-union, poor service at a resturant, and unfortunately crap like this. Personally I think those crazy religious folks need to spend their time in better ways. How is if I explain what the ACLU is doing with these nut jobs, I am supporting the "cowards" yet all of the sudden the ACLU who is doing all to work representing these cowards aren't? Work your voodoo on me again Minors.

QUOTE(Gregory Pratt @ Jul 23, 2006 -> 10:51 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Potatoed?

I think Regal also chopped the spiff out of him and even "potatoed" him.

Sorry, there's something very amusing to me about a guy wanting to be a writer and mixing up "your" and "you're." Usually people are mixing them up (Gaging them?) here.

QUOTE(minors @ Jul 23, 2006 -> 01:02 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> What I don't understand is why these ACLU people care so much on which way these thugs die. Does it really matter how they die? As far as I am concerned we could still use beheadings. Such violent posts like these make me think you are part of Al-Qeda. What I also find funny is how you claim you don't care how they die, yet you started a thread on how a guy died in a way by choice instead of the way he was supposed to die. If you don't care, why are you amking such a fuss out of it and dragging the ACLU and liberal bashing into it? EDIT: Didn't see Soxy's post. Please don't hate me.

QUOTE(minors @ Jul 23, 2006 -> 07:18 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> ACLU protecting cowards who picket at military funerals I am glad they find such great causes to defend. Defending cowards a new low for the ACLU Minors, Get it through your head. The ACLU has to represent everyone that feel his or her rights are being violated. They can't pick and choose other it's discrimination. Using your twisted logic, some lawyers are "cowards" for defending murders, rapists or child molestors.