GreenSox

QUOTE (greg775 @ Oct 29, 2015 -> 11:43 PM) Olt is a young 27. Are we all OK with letting him start next year and see what we've got? Remember, Gillaspie was a starter for the Sox for a year and change ... Is it Olt time considering those 2 mammoth blasts he hit last September? It wouldn't be my preference. But then again, I don't want the Sox "going for it". I want them to continue to build by making savvy deals wherever they may lie, without pressing to "fill a hole" (because the Sox have about 6 holes by my count). So if that leaves us short a 3B again, so be it.

QUOTE (LDF @ Oct 29, 2015 -> 09:57 AM) Engel is really coming into his own, esp since June and July.... however being moved to 3b..... i hope he develops more power. Where is the "moved to 3B" coming from?

QUOTE (klaus kinski @ Oct 29, 2015 -> 08:38 PM) Morneau option not picked up. What do you think? Always killed it in our park Neither. Sox need to get more versatile. Fewer dead veterans needed as well.

QUOTE (scs787 @ Oct 29, 2015 -> 10:43 AM) Well, the majority of the fan base likes Steverson for whatever reason, sooooo..... Only because he's a non insider. As have hoodwinked Hahn and Williams for over a decade so see if this is any different.

QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Oct 27, 2015 -> 08:09 AM) He's got plenty of arm for any OF slot. But his strong skills in routes, speed and glove work mean his value is highest in CF. Yes!

QUOTE (whtsoxfan @ Oct 25, 2015 -> 01:20 PM) Any of these make sense? http://chicagostylesports.com/2015/10/25/c...series-in-2016/ Some might, but not the one for the White Sox. Not a single elite prospect in the bunch. And of course, Starlin Castro, who has about zero trade value.

QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Oct 25, 2015 -> 02:01 PM) You aren't getting Russell, Baez, Schwarber, or Bryant if you offer Q. their guys still in the minors, Soler, and Castro are their trade pieces.. Then they won't get much in trade. Castro has very little trade value. Teams aren't exactly lining up for .667 OPS at a bargain price of $40 million. I think they'd trade Schwarber...all that talk about him playing C is just that...to up his value. He has no position.

QUOTE (Dick Allen @ Oct 24, 2015 -> 01:54 PM) Based on the fact he is 22 and they think he is going to be a stud. When he was 21 he was considered one of the top 5 prospects in the game. If the Sox want Cubs prospects who played this year, Castro is the guy they would dump, maybe Soler. It is just fantasy to think the Sox could get Schwarber or Baez. Maybe if they traded Sale. You can tell me I am wrong, but when you see the Cubs 2016 roster you will see I was right. What Cubs prospect is named Castro? Starlin? He's no prospect. Soler is terrible on D - he'd fit right in here. YOu may be right, based on what they say. But I also know that both Theo and Maddon are in PR mode 24/7, and they hype their players incessantly. (one would have thought that Castro had an excellent year, listening to those 2). There is a further purpose for hype beyond PR.

QUOTE (ChiSoxFanMike @ Oct 25, 2015 -> 09:50 AM) This is sort of off-topic, but I don't understand why everyone likes Tyler Danish so much. He's only 21, so he's very young, but he put up a 4.50 ERA last year in AA. That's not very impressive to me. I see him as a future bullpen arm, if that. He took a step back last year, but he's awfully young and still has a good chance to turn into an effective reliever. And one of the common threads of success in this era, aside from YOUNG talent, is a bullpen with 3 or 4 high end relievers.

QUOTE (BlackSox13 @ Oct 24, 2015 -> 05:30 PM) Just to entertain the Sox/cubs trade idea. I wonder if something like Erik Johnson for Villanueva/Castro would be close? Sox could decline Alexei's option and go after a FA pitcher like Latos or preferably Iwakuma. I'm not really a fan of Castro but his contract is relatively cheap and he is only 25 so there's still hope for his bat and him developing into a decent SS or 2BB. Not sure the cubs would be interested in EJ though. Castro sported an OPS of .667 this year and is basically owed $40 million over the next 4 years. Sox already have several middle infield guys who struggle with the bat. We want to trade a promising young pitcher for that? Honestly....

Frazier had a second half OPS of .664. His home/road splits are large He has 2 years left on his deal. Bring on the hero-worship. But I'll pass Build with young talent, please, like most of the winning organizations.

QUOTE (HickoryHuskers @ Oct 23, 2015 -> 01:58 PM) Very few teams get much hitting out of the C and SS positions. Sox need to upgrade at least two out of 2B, 3B, DH and RF. And LF, which is really a bigger problem than RF since the bad player in LF is immovable thanks to the love of declining veterans. (and, of course, the CW hereon that Melky is a good player and Avi is terrible is just daft). And to contend, 4/5 will need to be upgraded. Of course, more declining veterans may be the fix Hahn and Williams seek to upgrade these positions.

QUOTE (Jose Abreu @ Oct 23, 2015 -> 03:45 PM) Catching is such a weak position across MLB. Our catching situation shouldn't be one of our top two concerns. I agree. Usually, although there are exceptions, you can upgrade 2 positions for the cost of a catcher. Sox need upgrades at 2b, SS, 3b, LF, RF. Wouldn't worry so much about catcher.

QUOTE (Y2JImmy0 @ Oct 22, 2015 -> 07:31 AM) Yesterday on the Boers and Bernstein Show, they briefly talked about the White Sox. Terry Boers said something to the effect of " The one guy that I know is available is Eaton". Bernstein was then excited and thought that was a good idea to free up CF for Trayce. This seems like an awful idea. Eaton has 6.6 fWAR over the last 2 seasons, is fairly cheap, and 26 years old. Unless he's a locker room problem, that's not a guy that a team in the White Sox position should move. Thoughts? It's an excellent idea to sell high on Eaton, especially with Trayce, the superior defender, in tow.

QUOTE (OmarComing25 @ Oct 21, 2015 -> 04:48 PM) Not hard to see why his bottom line is miserable, all of his teams have been f***ing terrible. I'm actually surprised he managed to win 80 games with one of them. Fair enough, but you could produce similar statistics for Ventura re offense and defense and see why his bottom line is miserable. I'm looking for a reason to believe he's a good manager, beyond his use of analytics.

Acta was one of the earlier managers that embraced analytics, so the stats guys have enduring love for him. But his bottom line is miserable. I don't know if it's his fault, etc. I do want a manager who uses analytics. But there are a lot of those guys, and see little reason to take one that has a poor percentage. Plus, given that Ventura is coming back, unfortunate as that may be, it just doesn't make sense to have an experienced manager looking over his shoulder. That's not healthy. I'd much rather an Alomar type who at least can presume to be at a proper position of bench coach.

QUOTE (SoxPride18 @ Oct 20, 2015 -> 06:06 PM) And people were worried about that we weren't going to get a comp pick for him. It was obvious months ago he wouldn't resign. Didn't get along with Cooper. The question for me was always would anyone sign him by the deadline so that the Sox would get a comp pick.

QUOTE (JolietThunder @ Oct 19, 2015 -> 03:04 PM) Is Domonic Brown worth picking up? http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2015/10/phil...onic-brown.html No. He is worse offensively and defensively than Avi, not to mention melky. Heck he's worse than Viciedo. Sox need athleticism

QUOTE (shysocks @ Oct 9, 2015 -> 03:10 PM) Let's assume for simplicity that Eaton has center field covered, so our right fielder is either Trayce or Avi. Let's also assume that Avi can be a -10 run defender next year (that's generous) and Trayce can be +5 (that's pretty realistic). Let's also assume that Avi is a -2 baserunner and Trayce is +3. That means Avi would have to make up 20 runs, or 2 WAR, with his bat. That's probably a difference of about 25-30 wRC+. In our park that's roughly the difference between Melky Cabrera's .273/.314/.394/.709 and Adam Eaton's .287/.361/.431/.792. Trayce could definitely put up worse than Melky's line, but I see no reason to believe Avi could do better than Eaton's. Or the Sox could move Eaton to left and Trayce to center and move Melky on his way. That would improve the D significantly. Avi, in his first full season, hit a whole .34 OPS less than Melky and had twice the number of assists. Even better, sell high on Eaton- rather trade him to plug holes than Quintana.

QUOTE (OmarComing25 @ Oct 16, 2015 -> 06:05 PM) 1) Micah was hitting .270 when he got sent down but slugging below .300, saying he was the third best hitter is a stretch. His defense was really, really bad, he needed to go down and work on it full-time. Also, Robin didn't send him down. 5) So Robin traded those players away? Once again I'm not sure what the complaint against Robin here is, Semien and Phegley were hardly ever available for him to use when they were here. Micah was the 3rd best hitter when he was sent down. Melky, Eaton and other luminaries had lousy starts. Re 5, indeed, the front office deserves blame as well. They continually chase declining veterans, as if they're an answer to anything. Heck, they even brought Beckham back, afraid to cede the utility infielder job to one of the bevy of infield prospects they had in AAA. There is a lack of creativity throughout this organization.

QUOTE (caulfield12 @ Oct 16, 2015 -> 08:59 AM) W Throwing a bunch of names like Montas, Beck and Danish together won't accomplish much, either. Or maybe the Sox can actually figure out how to use players like Montas or Micah. Longoria's OBP has been below a modest .330 for 2 straight years. Let's have declining veterans for 5 prospects, Alex.

QUOTE (OmarComing25 @ Oct 16, 2015 -> 09:25 AM) And how should he have used his personnel this season? It's not like he had a bounty of options. Beckham and Bonaficio completely stunk up the joint at the plate. I think he utilized Shuck/Soto pretty well, and when Saladino came up he stopped using Conor as he should have. Only issue was maybe taking too long to pull the plug on LaRoche, but it's not like there were a lot of better options and it wasn't necessarily a bad idea to see if he could turn it around. Part of it is chicken and egg. they don't give him platoonable parts because he doesn't know how to platoon. Further, with expanded rosters, he had ability to do things and he still didn't know how to do it (except for Trayce and he was protecting him from righties). however, to answer your question 1)Micah could have been subbed regularly for defense in late innings. That way, they wouldn't have had to jettison what was the 3rd best hitter on the team. 2)Neither Dunn nor Laroche needed to take many at bats against left handed pitchers. 3)With the lost season, they could have even used Saladino or Olt against lefties, if only to see if they possibly could excel on one side of the plate. 4)In 2014, Gillaspie murdered right handed pitching. Not platooned. 5)Guys like Phegley (defense not up to cooper's standards), Semien (can't play SS), Ravelo (insufficient power for 1B) all had flaws and all were sent away. The first 2 out hit most player on our team. Oakland figured out how to use them (you just don't play Semien at SS). The Sox didn't bother or realized that it's beyond the skill set of the 2 sacred cows managing the dugout. The offense paid dearly for Cooper wanting to protect his ground ball pitchers. Note that Shark, a fly ball pitcher, got no such help from the D. They wouldn't budge the woeful Melky out of left e.g. I'm actually optimistic. I think the Sox have some young talent, if they would use it properly. But they just seem uninterested and would prefer to send it away for some veteran.

QUOTE (caulfield12 @ Oct 16, 2015 -> 04:07 PM) But also heady/gritty/grindy in Sox tradition... That's the old tradition. That's what Shark was, and they want nothing to do with him (regardless of how he pitched). The new tradition is happy go lucky clowns, like alexei, eaton and Melky.

QUOTE (Chicago White Sox @ Oct 16, 2015 -> 08:34 AM) I'm not ready to rule out Trayce as a regular, but completely ignoring his minor league track record and citing one outlier isn't going to convince me he is. If we're serious about competing next year, he should begin the season as our 4th OF and force his way into the lineup. And that could very well happen if LaRoche is retained as our DH. RF should be an area of focus this offseason as a potential spot for an impact bat. Contending? To contend that Sox have to get better at catcher, third-base, shortstop, second base, left field, right field. So with all of those weak spots/holes, the guy who shine for six weeks, yet with all those holes, he is a bench player. searching for stars, with so many holes is madness. Welcome to the Cincinnati Reds. Heroes galore in the outfield at third base and on the pitching staff. And a terrible team.

QUOTE (OmarComing25 @ Oct 15, 2015 -> 11:20 PM) The point is, replacing Robin should be last on the list of priorities. Pretty much every other need is more pressing. Not really. Robin can't platoon nor use pinch hitting properly. Thus flawed players who have one excellent aspect of their game ( while weak at something else) are of little use. he doesn't use personnel well.