HuskyCaucasian

QUOTE (Mplssoxfan @ Apr 16, 2008 -> 02:12 PM) She misspoke and she's grown and learned. Duh. oh how stupid of me. you're right.

This could sting: Hillary Clinton On Southern Working Class Whites In 1995: "Screw 'Em"

QUOTE (StrangeSox @ Apr 16, 2008 -> 04:40 AM) They only really spend their time and money in a few key states anyway. Even with the Electoral College, many states are still ignored. In fact, it'd seem that a majority of the population is ignored since many of the most populous states are guaranteed to go one way or the other. Here's a map of where Kerry and Bush spent their time and money 6 weeks prior to the 2004 election:

QUOTE (kapkomet @ Apr 16, 2008 -> 12:00 PM) And I generally agree with the point you're making as well but the dilution of those points are dependant on what side you're on. agreed

QUOTE (kapkomet @ Apr 16, 2008 -> 11:49 AM) But I guess it means nothing when you meet people and have a meeting with them, unless it's George W. Bush or Dick Cheney - then it's a news story worthy of digging up everything you can. Just sayin'. I understand your point. What I am saying is that, to me, there is a difference between holding a secret meeting about energy policy by Dick Chaney and seeking an endorsement by a Chicago insider.

QUOTE (lostfan @ Apr 16, 2008 -> 11:50 AM) I read something on that before and it just sounded like a really irresponsible use of the word "terrorist" by some people that want to get into scuzzbag politics. Ayers was involved in bombing government buildings! how is that not terrorism?

QUOTE (lostfan @ Apr 16, 2008 -> 11:42 AM) Don't have time to read it atm but I'm assuming that's that board he sits on where the guy who is a convicted felon also sits, which automatically means that Obama not only is ideologically in line with whatever the guy went to prison for, he actually had something to do with it and continues to support it to this day. About right? Well, the article doesn't say that, but yes.. that is the POV of Rush and Hannity. He served on aboard with him... ergo they are in cahoots.

QUOTE (StrangeSox @ Apr 16, 2008 -> 11:16 AM) How does that work anyway? They sit you in a chair and hand you a potentiometer and you turn it to how much you like/ dislike something at any given instant? Exactly right. Props for calling it a potentiometer.

Clinton's recent attack ad was tested:

QUOTE (StrangeSox @ Apr 16, 2008 -> 10:52 AM) My favorite part is that the reporter was 1000% subjective. He wasn't even interested in be an objective, impartial reporter. It's Fox News. Objective isnt in their vocabulary.

This Just In: John Murtha (a Clinton supporter) just said John McCain is too old to be president. http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/200.../16/902293.aspx

Fox News Gets Owned:

QUOTE (jasonxctf @ Apr 16, 2008 -> 10:22 AM) Will the Dems cut lose Lieberman is they have a greater than 51 seat position? I think so. Heck, Connecticut might cut him loose after all this when he is up for reelection. Note this (fast forward to 1:30)-

QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Apr 16, 2008 -> 10:16 AM) I think you mean he's a windsock, or a flip-flopper, or something along those lines. good catch. yea, that's what I meant. My bad. PS: when the democrats pick up 2+ seats in the senate this fall, they will dump Lieberman. Just my guess.

QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Apr 16, 2008 -> 10:14 AM) Well of course she will do those things (although, I don't know what you mean by 'terrorist guy'). Oh you gotta listen to more Rush and Hannity then. this is a "big" story. Apparently Obama is a terrorist sympathizer. http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0208/8630.html

Yea, he's a bell weather. He has no spine.

QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Apr 16, 2008 -> 10:08 AM) PPP is trash. Their polls have been all over the map. Per the table I posted a few pages back, PPP has an average error of 7. While high, let's translate that. Obama +3 = Clinton +4. VERY small win for Clinton.

QUOTE (NorthSideSox72 @ Apr 16, 2008 -> 09:08 AM) The debate tonight might push it one way or the other - either put Clinton back in charge, or make it a dead even race. My fear is Clinton will TRY to go scorched earth this evening. Bring up Resko or that terrorist guy. She'll do anything and a NATIONAL TV debate is a great forum.

For what it's worth: Post "Bitter-Gate", Obama now has a 3 point LEAD in PA. Yes it is not Survey USA, but it is interesting.

First the girl in the 3AM said she supports Obama... now a Clinton supporter in one of her ads isnt registered to vote in PA!!

Caption this Photo:

QUOTE (Athomeboy_2000 @ Apr 15, 2008 -> 04:30 PM) On March 26th, I proposed "Clean Campaign '08" on my BarackObama blog and my personal website. Well, McCain was just on Hardball and Matthews asked if he'd do what I proposed in my writing (I am not saying he ever saw my blog, but the ideas he asked him were exactly the same). McCain agreed. ROCK ON! Come on Obama. Join the Clean Campaign '08 bandwagon! Here is the video:

QUOTE (Heads22 @ Apr 15, 2008 -> 07:07 PM) TPM Dakota Wesleyan poll. tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/ Based on some other polls, the following "red" states might be graspable... Alaska (McCain +5), Montana (McCain +5) Obama NEEDS NM, CO, and WI or he is toast.

QUOTE (Heads22 @ Apr 15, 2008 -> 07:07 PM) TPM Dakota Wesleyan poll. tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/ http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmem...tracker/ndpres/ ND-Pres (Apr 15 Dakota Wesleyan) Obama (D) 46%, McCain ® 42%

QUOTE (Heads22 @ Apr 15, 2008 -> 07:03 PM) Heh, Obama beating McCain in North Dakota. linky?