Everything posted by bmags
-
5/10 - White Sox @ Rangers Game Thread
Our runs by inning is some sort of math pattern. I love it. Great fight offense
-
5/10 - White Sox @ Rangers Game Thread
QUOTE (daa84 @ May 10, 2016 -> 09:56 PM) Anyone remember Miguel ascencion? Ha. I love the random games sox fans remember. What was that? 02?
-
5/10 - White Sox @ Rangers Game Thread
Not sure I can do a late game again. Was dragging today. This is fun thou
-
5/10 - White Sox @ Rangers Game Thread
QUOTE (flavum @ May 10, 2016 -> 09:40 PM) Hope Carroll can go three tonight. He can GO 3, are they going to be quality is the question.
-
5/10 - White Sox @ Rangers Game Thread
Just got back from tennis. Was there a rain delay? Rangers have to hit bullpen early. Come on Rodon, this could be huge for us if you can go 7 even if u give up a few more.
-
5/10 - White Sox @ Rangers Game Thread
He'll figure it out. But man we needed him to be efficient this game.
-
Early Trade Speculation
QUOTE (Dunt @ May 10, 2016 -> 04:26 PM) It's not going to take a top 50 prospect to get 2 months of Reddick. I'd do something along the lines of Adams+, but after that no thanks. With no chance of a qualifying offer, he will definitely hit free agency primed for a big pay day. Why do I feel like Beane will get the most out of Danish?
-
The Rollins Conundrum
QUOTE (Special K @ May 10, 2016 -> 04:13 PM) Not sure if Lawrie will maintain his OBP, but it's far better than whatever Rollins is doing. I am also fine with Melky in 2 hole, but it seems like Lawrie is better suited. Not Rollins tho. Maybe Avi if he maintains. Right, Lawrie would not be an ideal #2 hitter, but he becomes one when your #2 hitter has a .610 OPS. He may not have great contact but he has better power.
-
Playoff odds
Do you guys remember the theme that Manuel gave too quick of a hook to our young pitchers like garland and didn't let them learn how to pitch. Then Ozzie let them in and they learned. Looking back that was pretty bizarre. Was nice that all 4 of those pitchers had rubber arms.
-
2016 Democratic Thread
Do you guys mean successful business owners?
-
5/10 - White Sox @ Rangers Game Thread
QUOTE (Leonard Zelig @ May 10, 2016 -> 02:40 PM) Carroll should be able to go more than one inning. Oh definitely, but if its a close game/we are winning I don't know we want him to.
-
Playoff odds
QUOTE (lostfan @ May 10, 2016 -> 02:45 PM) I remember that the team was so fundamentally sound that Ozzie could really do no wrong. Ha, yeah that plus insane bullpen really make you a great manager.
-
Playoff odds
QUOTE (lostfan @ May 10, 2016 -> 02:38 PM) This is kind of the feeling I had. I didn't have a negative feeling, but I remember being like "the Sox are just gonna be their usual above-average, but not great selves." I was shocked by how hot they started the season and once the summer started and they showed no signs of slowing down I was never excited about any baseball season like that before. The lineup didn't even really look that imposing on paper (even though they ended up hitting lots of homers). Jermaine Dye started off really slow that year, and Frank Thomas got injured early, but that didn't seem to stop them. I don't want to make too many parallels between this team and that team though. The whole 45 first half stolen bases for scotty pods was pretty crazy. Probably around this time when a similar game happened where we were trailing or came back to tie. Pods got on base. Stole second. Bunt to third. Driven home. Sox win. It was just automatic with him on the base paths. I had way higher confidence on that team. But, I do feel really good late when Eaton comes up and knowing what comes behind him.
-
2016 Democratic Thread
Too obvious of trolling greg, try again.
-
The Rollins Conundrum
You are right, we should always go by the last 2 games results to judge all actions.
-
5/10 - White Sox @ Rangers Game Thread
QUOTE (shipps @ May 10, 2016 -> 02:22 PM) All the more reason I want to see a nice gem out of Rodon tonight. Helps to have a Lefty against this middle of the order.
-
5/10 - White Sox @ Rangers Game Thread
Who are the bullpen pieces we can rely on tonight: Duke (did he only face 1 batter?) Albers (because he's a horse/cat and non stressful inning Carroll - almost guaranteed Probably resting Robertson - 1 1/3 innings Jones - 1 inning Putnam (he pitched like 22 pitches) Jennings - 2 innings So, we at least need 6 innings.
-
The Rollins Conundrum
Right. I would like to move Lawrie to 2nd batting order, but, I don't want to mess with where he is as long as he's hitting. If Avi is legit, maybe move him up.
- Playoff odds
-
Playoff odds
QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ May 10, 2016 -> 01:47 PM) Sox were picked something like 3rd or 4th going into the season. Fans were really divided on the Pods/Carlos Lee trade. Not a whole lot of optimism pre-season. Bandwagon got rolling early with a hot start. Pretty similar to this year honestly. I remember differently. I remember after the late AJ and Iguchi signings, people really feeling positive about how complete the team was. I don't think anyone thought world series, but I felt good about playoffs, as good as I had during 01-04.
-
Early Trade Speculation
Why on earth would anyone want Jose Reyes? Horrible person. Horrible shortstop. I'll take our .630 OPS over that P.O.S. anyday.
-
2016 Democratic Thread
QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ May 10, 2016 -> 01:04 PM) One thing I will say is that Trump is bringing a ridiculous number of crappy and pissed off white people. For the first time since I have been alive, there were more Republican ballots taken in my county primary than Democratic, in a county that is 3:2 Democratic. I don't want to see Trump win, but I also won't pretend that there isn't something going on there. Despite that, it's unclear he will match Romney's "white people" share if his women numbers are so horrible. For Trump to win, he needs to win all of Romney's voters plus X amount of Obama's voters. With the nation becoming less white, do you think he has the ability to do that?
-
2015-2016 NBA Thread
MJ had to deal with MJ fatigue from voters. Curry's season was amazing and that OT last night seals it. That it's the first unanimous MVP vote ever means very little to me. There are always a lot of stupid writers that don't take their job seriously.
-
2016 Democratic Thread
she's consistently a 5-6 point lead. That type of lead is not synonymous to losing a bunch of states but winning nat pop vote. That poll is interesting for hyperventilating but meaningless.
-
**2016 TV Watercooler Thread**
QUOTE (RockRaines @ May 10, 2016 -> 10:14 AM) I thought it was a bit too obvious. Eh, I liked it. The joke from Richard was so out of nowhere I was barely paying attention I was laughing so hard. Silicon valley is so much better than it deserves to be for a 30 minute sitcom.