bmags

Cons/Pros Rick hahn Cons: conservative with top talent on market, too aggressive with aging power hitters Pros: Knows how names work

Yes it's bad. It's the silly assumption that the opposite of bad is always good and not worse.

Until the obvious happens and TLR wants different players

boy mookie betts sure is good.

?

nothing says squeaky clean like tony la russa. Shame Eddie Johnson isn't still the police chief, they could have had a ball.

this is obnoxious

You realize this would be a pretty big right? The owner installing his own manager and bypassing his GM and President?

So why would Hahn put himself in a trap like this?

I think one piece is a realistic deal needs to be more 2021 ready for them. Maybe a 3 team deal

Well that wasn’t a 1 for 1, deivi Garcia is their #1 prospect

Arrietta is donezo

Where did you see that?

The attractiveness to frazier is the re-allocation of money to exclusively pitching is very attractive this year. Which means yanks could get a haul unfortunately.

oh yeah sorry. I did stiever + thompson. I'm really not sure what he costs tbh.

don't care going to do this all day Medium-sized pitching approach + clint frazier

Maybe. Maybe a pandemic occurred and people know Ball rumors do well.

Why is that a red flag

So they think LaRussa is a worse manager?

New Ringer mock draft has Bulls getting Lamelo.

Uh oh, the double B-hive bout to blow up James mentions.

It probably is honestly, and Marwin is definitely more durable and passable in infield than Leury. I could see two equally plausible scenarios. - The top FAs get gobbled up quick to reasonably similar deals to before, but then all other mid-level/low-level FAs are put on ice and start taking really low deals in Jan/Feb. - The mid-level guys jump at first available deals, while top FAs hold out for months and possibly benefit at greater fidelity into 2021 fidelity on attendance (or vice versa, gamble and are crushed by bad news there)

How did it happen in 94, were they in between deals?

So just to recap, you stated that Bauer's expertise is overblown and every pitcher uses tech. It was pointed out that a lot of that tech used in major league pitching programs was introduced by Bauer and Boddy's work and that's why he gets credit. And now you are saying that's a different argument than what? If every pitcher invented a new tool to use to help train how to pitch at an elite level, then yes, it wouldn't be that impressive that Bauer did it.

A lot of pitchers are using the tech they are using now because their teams bought tech after Bauer and Kyle Boddy's work with introducing tech from golf and biology and a bunch of other places. So no, they may not think they are using tech because of bauer, but their teams bought that tech because of him.