bmags

But Jones was really good!

Also a lot of these movies are targeted to american audiences, giving english accents creates an aura of foreignness without needing to actually create a foreign tongue/accent.

Also...man Paulie's 2010-2012 seasons were good. That 2010 team was so fun despite not making the playoffs and Manny Ramirez being on them.

The aging curve was much more forgiving the decade before, so it didn't seem that scary. When you had a bunch of guys in their mid thirties at the top of their game, it's not that big a stretch to see Konerko still there.

AA is the league man. It's legit hard, and if they survive there you can pretty much count on seeing them in bigs in some capacity.

I pretty much agree with this. If he succeeds in AA, and I mean really succeeds, not his w-s numbers but .500 slugging, > .330 obp, then it's time. With the major league balls in AAA it's just a bandbox. He'll learn more in bigs.

The hard part about making big moves mid-season is they'll have risers but they don't drop people too much. If he's back up to his old 15-30 range where he was based on potential that feels right to me

Can someone point to me where the safe spot of the castle was?

Maybe. I think he's just going to rake.

Bravo. So we have Robert / Rutherford / Gonzalez / Basabe to cycle through while Adolfo is on IL. When Adolfo returns, I'm guessing Basabe is promoted.

I dont' know, it would have removed some bad Yolmer errors. And even though Moncada looks promising at 3rd, Machado >>>> Moncada there. But yeah it's not a playoff team, though, man, what a trash division.

The nice thing about getting athletic shortstops is you can plug them in where you need them if you are competitive. Think of Trea Turner being a LF starting out with Nats. The reason I brought up the Dodgers is for a while people kept saying they should trade from surplus, instead they just...played all of them. And that depth really has improved their odds to win the division each year - through injuries and sub par performances from certain players. You can't do the same thing with a corner only outfielder or 1b. And really, Madrigal - if he was a starter - would be the guy I'd move all over as he has the mindset for it.

Trout

You are still way too high on india.

Are you answering the question the OP proposed here?

I'll answer a question with a question - what do you think the Dodgers would do in that situation?

So that Blake Walston prep pitcher I've been crushing on for round 2, Law said he would be a tough sign which makes me just cross him off. Hard to compete with the multi-pick teams on guys like that.

What a disaster. This is going to like, end up getting back to Law in a chat "saw you put Vaughn ahead of Rutschmann!"

So, I accidentally flipped them. Rutschmann is still 1. My bad!

oh crap I am an idiot Everyone I screwed up 1 and 2. Rutschmann is 1. I'll edit. A note for all the quotes.

I'll take my chances. Victory laps after april tend not to last.

I received it in PDF so I have to type it out, so ranking is what you'll get but I'll summarize any questions you have. 1. Rutschmann 2. Vaughn 3. Witt 4. Carroll 5. Abrams 6. Green 7. Bleday 8. Bishop 9. Manoah 10. Lodolo Priester was at 20.

I, too, read "has not been bad" as "has been very good". Walks are in Ottavino's profile, his k's are there, he'll have variations but I would not be deterred by him back there. We'd give him more space to develop, but he'll always be valuable at deadline because he k's guys.

Uh, colome is 30. Do you think he's going to be our closer for the next generation or something? These guys purpose was to get us a stabilized back end. They will all need to be replaced when the time comes, and hopefully internally.

I mean, yeah, SSS is kinda a big part of that. And Ottavino has not been bad and has not had the light schedule we have had. Soria is fine, he had some bad luck.