Rowand44

JC shall dominate today.

QUOTE(Chisoxfn @ Jul 3, 2006 -> 09:49 PM) Its hands down the best division in baseball and you could make a case that 3 of the 5 best teams in baseball are in the division (Mets and BoSox being the ones not in the division; I left the Cards out for a reason, namely that there pitching is weaksauce and I tend to think the Mets is too). Wait, wait....did you say weaksauce?

QUOTE(Kalapse @ Jul 4, 2006 -> 02:08 AM) Oh boy, you just set Flash up for a huge rant.

QUOTE(SoxFan1 @ Jul 4, 2006 -> 01:16 AM) America, meh. :finger

QUOTE(Chisoxfn @ Jul 4, 2006 -> 12:53 AM) Ya, and the Illini are the best football team in the great state of Illinois. IN years past there were probably high school teams around the country that could beat them (the Long Beach Poly's of the world). Does SIU have a FB team, if they do they probably could have too LOL, division 1aa. We actually play IU in football this year along with basketball so we'll see how the football game goes. As for basketball we will be the best team in Illinois this year and will beat IU as well(Greasy, I know you're reading this ). greasy: NEVER. Sig bet you chicken.

QUOTE(Chisoxfn @ Jul 4, 2006 -> 12:38 AM) . I was gonna say something bad about Tony, but don't got anything to say, its not like he totally hates the best football team in the state of Iowa. Northern Iowa?

QUOTE(Heads22 @ Jul 4, 2006 -> 12:28 AM) Boo.....somehow, I bet Greasy was involved.

QUOTE(CWSGuy406 @ Jul 4, 2006 -> 12:20 AM) Is there a reason why Lamura isn't in Charlotte this year? He pitched decently in about 40 innings of Birmingham last year, and he's a little old for AA. It's tough for me to get excited about a 23 year old repeating AA, even with the nice K/IP numbers. He should be moved up to Charlotte within the next month, yes? BHAM said before that he had never trusted his stuff before this year, so maybe they wanted to keep him in Birmingham until he learned to trust his above average stuff. Regardless, it's about time he goes to Charlotte.

QUOTE(CWSGuy406 @ Jul 3, 2006 -> 11:59 PM) 1.) Veteran team or not, the offense on that Diamondback team, for the most part, sucked. Luis Gonzalez was good, Reggie Sanders and Mark Grace were decent. They had a pretty good bench, which helped, but for their starters, they had three above average hitters. The Twins are a much more well-rounded team, and as of a couple weeks ago, got better at three different positions, without even mentioning the pitching. The left side of the infield just got a HUGE upgrade, replacing Castro with Bartlett and Batista with Cuddyer. Jason Kubel is finally healthy, and is hitting the way he was pre-injury. Morneau is flashing his power potential. Need I mention Mauer? 2.) So, Johan Santana is going to flip the calander, see it's September, and start to suck? Or, wait -- Liriano is going to do that, right? 'Cause he's a rookie? Is that what you're saying? No real good reasoning, just that their young, and don't have that mystical "veteran presence"? Ha. Ha ha. The kid made the point that two pitchers (starters, as he was pointing to Santana and Liriano) can't carry a team. They most certainly can. It helps when you have a guy challenging to hit .400, a decent back-of-the-rotation, a good bullpen, and a decent overall lineup. *Yeah, and before I get jumped all over, having people say "so you'd rather have the Twins team?", no, I'm not saying that. First off, I was making an off-hand comparison between the Twins and the D-Backs, not the Sox. The Twins are going to the playoffs one way or another.

QUOTE(flbob @ Jul 3, 2006 -> 09:27 PM) of course, the sox have started the week 0-2 (i start weeks on sunday, even if mlb starts them on mondays. how convenient!) :7) Well Obviously I was talking about starting today considering a new series started. Like I said, the Tigers will have a losing week.

QUOTE(Tony82087 @ Jul 3, 2006 -> 07:20 PM) That is absolutely TERRIBLE. I have listened to his show once, and it was enough. That was brutal.

Tied.

QUOTE(Tony82087 @ Jul 3, 2006 -> 07:08 PM) Yes, hysterical.......... I was cracking up :rolly

QUOTE(Melissa1334 @ Jul 3, 2006 -> 07:07 PM) what happened? Maggs and Willie, same scenario.

Man, hopefully Tad is ok. Ouch

Jermaine is wearing some funny looking cleats.

Punch AJ. How clever.

QUOTE(Melissa1334 @ Jul 3, 2006 -> 05:53 PM) ozzie just now on the score,pregame: "1st of all, i dont choose schilling because i dont like him" who does? That makes two of us.

Ahh dh.

By the way, Detroit will have their first losing week in a while. You heard it here first.

QUOTE(jackie hayes @ Jul 3, 2006 -> 03:52 PM) What do game threads have to do with this one? I just don't like this lumping of everything negative in one pile. I get tired of the Garland stuff too, but I also get tired of the 'Coop and his magic fingers' response to any crap pitching performance. Anything lacking thought. But suppose there were a thread giving some facts about Uribe's performance in past years, suggesting that it should be smooth sailing the rest of the way (looking at monthly splits or something, I dunno, just throwing something out), and makes the point that 'defense is important' -- I'm not gonna go in there and tell the op that he's just another Goldilocks with his eyes shut to what's happening on the field. Why is so damn hard to look at the merits of the post you're responding to, not some post that annoyed you yesterday? Well, I think some people just get tired of seeing negative crap day in and day out from a team that is 25 over, that's all I'm saying and that's why I threw the game threads in there, cause a lot of times those are just unreadable. Anyways, I see what you're saying but imo a lot of it can be overboard at times and that's what pushes peoples buttons. Also, like I said, I think everyone on this board realizes that the starters need to get better and it really has been discussed numerous times, I didn't think this thread was necessary because everyone understands already the point he was trying to get across but whatever that's done already. There are definitely people here who are just giving constructive criticism but there are also others who do seem to be panicking.

QUOTE(jackie hayes @ Jul 3, 2006 -> 03:28 PM) But is it here, in this thread? The question is whether it's possible here to make a negative point and not be shouted down. There are always plenty of threads here that come through the negative view point. I also think what people hate around here is how ridiculous game threads can get and that kind of flows over onto other threads. When you see a poster say "GARLAND f***IN SUCKS" for letting up two runs in an inning and then he shuts them down the rest of the way, next thing you see that same poster make a real negative post and you realize how reactionary some people can be. Anyways, my point is when things go wrong for a little while this board becomes 100 percent negative with people literally jumping off buildings(choke avatars anyone). When you some some pessimists start threads like this, it's pretty natural for optimists to come into the thread and shoot them down a little bit especially when you have a team 25 games over .500 on July 3rd. To me, this is is just an unnecessary thread, I mean "White Sox maybe be in trouble if pitching doesn't come around," well...duh, everyone knows that.

QUOTE(jackie hayes @ Jul 3, 2006 -> 03:17 PM) Calling it panic doesn't make it panic. Sure seems like there is some panic. I've seen a ton of "our starting pitching sucks. We're not going far in the playoffs with this starting pitching." There sure are a lot of posters who give up on players REAL early on this site.