ptatc

Not saying he hasn't having issues. There are many types of issues in the elbow. Just the UCL isn't the most likely

That would be odd. The previous surgery was for bone spurs. This has no correlation to joint laxity or UCL issues. Unless there was something else not reported. Not like the guy from Houston who hhad a UCL reconstruction and continues to have issues there.

You don't know the power of the dark side. Let the anger flow. Appropriate.

Very little on this roster is valuable long term. They are all placeholders until the prospects arrive.

That can be said in many threads but I think you are correct.😆

True. Last year and this year the food will be the main attraction. Once the prospects come up it may shift. But until then, yeesh.

They are in the top 3 in my view. Boston may be better with legal seafood in the ballpark.

Going to be a good summer at the park. Brisket curds all the way.

It depends on definition of children. Better Middle school cross runners can. Not your average.

Go watch practice. I see it throughout the week. This isn't opinion. It's watching practice.

Thats crazy fast. Has to be braced.

I don't disagree. They aren't doing something right for their bodies shown by the constant soft tissue injuries. Not knowing their off season training it's hard to pinpoint what it is. But my guess would be they do the power but not the flexibility. Either that or they get their strength from better living through chemistry

Wotld record is in the 3:40s. It was broken 3 times in the last month for indoor season. Again they don't need total fitness. They need power and explosiveness not endurance. They train for their sport. Watch olympic sprinting. Do they not look fit?

True but what dies that have to do with Mayo's value. My comment was on what may limit his value even though he may hit.

I think the primary issue is that he doesn't have a position. He is basically a DH. Not much demand for a 23 year old DH. It really limits his value.

Someone else posted this. Last one I thought of was John Olerud.

It just depends on sport and training. Take track. Elite distance runners can run a 26.2 marathon averaging well under 5 minutes per mile. A sprinter your 100 and 200 meter runner can barely run 1 mile in under your 8 minutes. Why? They never train at distances over 400 meters. It's all about your training. It's referred to as SAID. Specific Adaptation to Imposed Demands.

Good call. I think he will. Not sure about contact rate but I think he'll hit 10 homeruns.

Agreed, although i think the pitching will be better overall this year and that will help the win total.

Sorry I get a little wordy and times. The professor in me.

Backs are messy. Too many moving parts. Fractures bones are mostly straight ward. Unless it's a comminuted fracture with many pieces they tend to heal well in the young athletic population unless there are co-morbidities like diabetes.

I would agree with all of this. Part of the complexity of back issues is that just because you have a discussion issue on imaging doesn't mean they are causing problems. They've done studies on disc imaging of people who have never had back issues and about 40% find disc's issues. As we age there is normal degeneration in the spine and related structures that cause no issues. While imaging is helpful, it should not be used without the physical exam and even then as you pointed out, the back is so complex it's really hard to evaluate and treat properly.

There is some truth to this.

If its always the one player, I would suspect it's more the player not listening or not being honest or accurate with the symptoms. This doesn't mean the player is faking or intentionally being dishonest. There are many factors that go into diagnosis, evaluation and treatment. It always starts with the patient subjective reports of incident and symptoms. That's what we have to base things on. Then we do our physical tests to determine what is going on from there. After that it's imaging to see if it conform what we found. If the patient isn't accurate it can lead away from the actual issue. There is referred pain where the reported pain has nothing to do with the actual issue. This can mislead the evaluation. A classic example is foot pain. Foot pain can be anything from structures in the foot to back issues and anything in between. The evaluation starts with the patient report. The example is always use is a golfer named Jose Maria Olazabal. He was having chronic foot pain and had two surgeries by world renowed physicians. He was going to retire due the pain and failed surgeries. He went to a physiotherapist recommended by a friend. They found a back issue, fixed him and he return to golf. He never, ever had back issues. How many people do you know who had back surgery and their issues went away. Happens a lot. Many times the back wasn't the issue and we can help them.

Fine with me. Take a lineman in either side.