-
Posts
21,525 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
7
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Milkman delivers
-
Well, I think this thread has been successfully derailed. You're welcome.
-
Realistic Adam Dunn expectations
Milkman delivers replied to DOWNTOWN PANTHER's topic in Pale Hose Talk
QUOTE (maggsmaggs @ May 24, 2011 -> 11:02 AM) I just realized how many grammatical errors were made in my last post. That was uglier than Dunn's swing. I didn't want to say anything... -
Realistic Adam Dunn expectations
Milkman delivers replied to DOWNTOWN PANTHER's topic in Pale Hose Talk
QUOTE (BigSqwert @ May 24, 2011 -> 11:02 AM) Yeah no kidding. At least move him down to the 5 or 6 hole. I just want to clarify to people that I wasn't being sarcastic. Who would have ever thought that Kotsay would be a better option almost two full months into the season? Is Ozzie Guillen a genius? (That part was sarcasm) -
Realistic Adam Dunn expectations
Milkman delivers replied to DOWNTOWN PANTHER's topic in Pale Hose Talk
QUOTE (BigSqwert @ May 24, 2011 -> 10:58 AM) Wow. Kotsay would be an upgrade. Remember all of the talk about how we'll automatically be better just by replacing Kotsay with Dunn? Who would have ever thought that that wouldn't be true? -
Realistic Adam Dunn expectations
Milkman delivers replied to DOWNTOWN PANTHER's topic in Pale Hose Talk
QUOTE (Steve9347 @ May 24, 2011 -> 10:54 AM) Yeah, we should definitely never fire Greg Walker or anyone. But you forget, he doesn't have any effect on established veterans because they are already set in their ways/swings. He only helps the young guys. You know, all of those young stud hitters we routinely produce. -
QUOTE (gravybread @ May 24, 2011 -> 10:55 AM) It said .273 when I first clicked on that as well, then changed after a refresh. weird. Oh good, so I'm not crazy.
-
QUOTE (Leonard Zelig @ May 24, 2011 -> 10:48 AM) Tell them to update their s*** It's weird, because now it's updated and it clearly makes me look insane.
-
QUOTE (LittleHurt05 @ May 24, 2011 -> 10:44 AM) What ESPN site are you looking at? His player page says .298 It seriously just said something different.
-
QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ May 24, 2011 -> 10:44 AM) If it was a bullet, he was supposed to be on top of the President. Either that or bring a mitt to the game and catch the damned ball. I'm not quite sure how with the President sitting in the front row, you don't prepare for the contingency that a baseball might well end up in his lap. They probably aren't too worried about that situation. Unless this is an f'n Naked Gun movie, a professional baseball player isn't going to attempt to harm a political leader in the crowd.
-
Realistic Adam Dunn expectations
Milkman delivers replied to DOWNTOWN PANTHER's topic in Pale Hose Talk
QUOTE (maggsmaggs @ May 24, 2011 -> 09:31 AM) To me he is the opposite of Jose Bautista who re-invented his swing and is a god now (maybe there are other factors, too, but whatever). Meanwhile Dunn has a horrible swing mechanically that is prevented him from making consistent contract. He just doesn't even look like he has a chance when he goes to the plate. That never, ever happens on the Sox. -
Where are these splits from? ESPN says he's batting .273/.349/.436/.785 in May.
-
Realistic Adam Dunn expectations
Milkman delivers replied to DOWNTOWN PANTHER's topic in Pale Hose Talk
QUOTE (iamshack @ May 24, 2011 -> 06:27 AM) We really don't care what he ends up with at the end of the season. What we want to see is him produce to his career norms from here on out. If he were to do that, I think we'd be in pretty good shape. Um, I care. We're paying the guy a lot of money. I expect him to put up his career numbers, not his worst season by far. QUOTE (southsider2k5 @ May 24, 2011 -> 07:46 AM) Anyways, Dunn will hit homers. He has always hit homers. I envy the optimism, but when is this supposed to start? -
QUOTE (bucket-of-suck @ May 23, 2011 -> 10:57 PM) That's cute, Mr. Perfect as Beckham has a .790 OPS in May. Is that even possible? He's seemed to have gotten worse as the season progressed.
-
I'm starting to think that Danks' hard luck is going to start taking more and more of a toll on him and his numbers.
-
QUOTE (Balta1701 @ May 23, 2011 -> 07:30 PM) You and I started at almost the same time. Can I scoff at you? Those 8 days probably made quite the difference, but go ahead and scoff away.
-
15,000 posts for the Milkman. All terrible, just terrible.
-
As unsure as I am that Bautista is clean, I would like to see a guy that is not overtly cheating to break the 61 mark.
-
Yet another White Sox Winner thread!
Milkman delivers replied to Balta1701's topic in Pale Hose Talk
Excuse me while I get in the last word. -
Yet another White Sox Winner thread!
Milkman delivers replied to Balta1701's topic in Pale Hose Talk
QUOTE (iamshack @ May 23, 2011 -> 04:15 PM) Not at all, just pointing out that if you were in charge the White Sox would have $125 million payroll and Charlotte's roster, since you cut everyone on our team in the name of change. Ah, OK. Straw man is usually the right way to go -
That's cute, Gordon. Let's put together a solid week before we declare ourselves out of a slump, though. OK? Thanks.
-
Yet another White Sox Winner thread!
Milkman delivers replied to Balta1701's topic in Pale Hose Talk
QUOTE (BigSqwert @ May 23, 2011 -> 04:05 PM) Yeah but this a large forum of baseball fans. Are we not allowed to have banter about the makeup of the team, personnel decisions, lineups, and in-game decisions? That's part of being a sports fan. Why are you so insulted by it? No, he just wants everyone to qualify each post by saying "I know I don't have all of the inside information and the job is probably harder than I'm making it out to be, but..." You know, as both Russ and I have already done in this thread. -
Yet another White Sox Winner thread!
Milkman delivers replied to Balta1701's topic in Pale Hose Talk
QUOTE (iamshack @ May 23, 2011 -> 04:00 PM) You've already cut Lilli, so he can't start revolving around the field. Did I cut him, or did I send him to the minors? I'm not sure, because you hadn't yet told me what I would have done. You seem to be a wealth of knowledge of what others would have done. (I'm also fairly certain that Lillibridge would have had to pass through waivers to be sent to the minors, before someone jumps in with that point) And who's to say that Milledge would not also be doing well if he were on the major league team? I suppose that's also you. -
Yet another White Sox Winner thread!
Milkman delivers replied to Balta1701's topic in Pale Hose Talk
QUOTE (iamshack @ May 23, 2011 -> 03:53 PM) The point is you are claiming Lillibridge should be starting instead of Pierre when in reality, if you were the one making the decisions, Lillibridge would no longer be on the roster. As for you mentioning arrogance, notice I am not sitting here criticizing the roster or the way the club is run. Very, very rarely do I call Ozzie into question. That's not because I think he is above criticism. That's because I don't have all the information he has and therefore I choose not to do so. What I am arguing is that this is just a little more difficult than you or many, many others around here seem to want to admit. I readily admit I do not have all the answers, nor do I think I could just step in and suddenly use logic to make all the correct decisions. Your first sentence is already wrong. I believe I've said twice in this thread that Viciedo should be starting instead of Pierre, and that Lillibridge should get more starts revolving around the field. -
Yet another White Sox Winner thread!
Milkman delivers replied to Balta1701's topic in Pale Hose Talk
QUOTE (iamshack @ May 23, 2011 -> 03:46 PM) Russ, that's not the argument. Notice I am not addressing you in this thread because you actually make real points, instead of just claiming we need to replace this person and that person every other day because "he sucks." I get the jab, but what other "points" should I be making? I explain that this player is the worst in baseball and how he brings nothing positive to the team, and suggest that we replace him with another player because he brings this, this, and this to the team. Why is it, since my points are contrary to yours, do you act like I'm not even making points? EDIT: And you're talking about arrogance. -
Yet another White Sox Winner thread!
Milkman delivers replied to Balta1701's topic in Pale Hose Talk
QUOTE (iamshack @ May 23, 2011 -> 03:40 PM) You're cutting Teahan. You've probably cut Pierre as well. For all I know, you might have cut Rios last season. So now you're on the hook for $6, 8, 15 million of player salaries for players no longer on your roster. All because you were certain changes needed to be made. You can assume all you want. I guess that's what you need to do to make my argument look worse. The fact of the matter is that we don't have anyone else to come in and start consistently in CF. As bad as Rios has been, we have to stick with him. Lillibridge can get a start here and there (or Milledge if he were still on the team), but neither could cut it as the regular. Pierre should be cut, yes. I'd try to trade both he and Teahen for anything, but chances are that nobody is taking either of them. They are sunk costs. They're going to get paid either way. Pierre is the worst player in baseball and brings nothing to the table. His average, if it raises, is empty and he has no value as a back-up due to his inability to play defense or steal. He is, without a doubt, a guy from whom you need to just cut ties. At this point, Teahen has some value as a pinch hitter with some left-handed power. He's not the absolute worst guy to have on the team if you're stuck with him, as we are. So unless a team is willing to take on at least some of his remaining salary in a trade, you can live with keeping him.
