Everything posted by southsider2k5
-
Chicago Slayer vs. Oakland Athletic 6/4 Thread-1:05pm-CSN
QUOTE (BigSqwert @ Jun 4, 2009 -> 01:41 PM) And that was a good hair day. At least the make up is spot on!
-
Chicago Slayer vs. Oakland Athletic 6/4 Thread-1:05pm-CSN
Well that's one way to do it
-
Chicago Slayer vs. Oakland Athletic 6/4 Thread-1:05pm-CSN
QUOTE (BigSqwert @ Jun 4, 2009 -> 01:38 PM) The lack of situational hitting is making me lose what little hair I have left. I noticed that in the potrait you have up here
-
Chicago Slayer vs. Oakland Athletic 6/4 Thread-1:05pm-CSN
Ugh. Two innings in a row with the lead off man on and nothing.
-
Chicago Slayer vs. Oakland Athletic 6/4 Thread-1:05pm-CSN
QUOTE (BigSqwert @ Jun 4, 2009 -> 01:29 PM) Someone refresh my memory. When is Q scheduled to come back? Something like the 10th or 11th.
-
Chicago Slayer vs. Oakland Athletic 6/4 Thread-1:05pm-CSN
QUOTE (Heads22 @ Jun 4, 2009 -> 01:23 PM) So belt high over the plate isn't a strike? This guys strike zone is really jumping around. He needs to find one and stick with it!
-
Chicago Slayer vs. Oakland Athletic 6/4 Thread-1:05pm-CSN
NIce start for Burls. Good to see him have no problems with Giambi.
-
The Republican Thread
QUOTE (lostfan @ Jun 4, 2009 -> 12:50 PM) I don't dispute that apostasy = treason to them, I'm just saying... he didn't want that to be a focus of his speech. He's not going to come out and say "well my father used to be Muslim but he actually was an atheist" because that would be dumb as hell, like you said. Bush didn't want the word "Crusade" to be the focus of the speech over there either... If you say the wrong thing, it will be the focus.
-
2009 AL Central Thread
QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Jun 4, 2009 -> 12:15 PM) New ballpark? If they don't win, it doesn't matter. Twins fans don't go to see a loser. History bears that out.
-
Chicago Slayer vs. Oakland Athletic 6/4 Thread-1:05pm-CSN
QUOTE (Soxfest @ Jun 4, 2009 -> 12:44 PM) Wise to play with a .161 average day after day is showing how stupid OG comments of his critics are! WHO THE HELL ELSE IS HE SUPPOSED TO PLAY OUT THERE???
-
The Republican Thread
QUOTE (lostfan @ Jun 4, 2009 -> 12:43 PM) You guys are killing me and this has turned into bulls*** quickly. I'm not going to re-post what I already said for anyone who couldn't be bothered to read it, but the point is that yes, he glossed over (actually omitted) the fact that his father was an atheist to make a larger point that he understood Islam. Nowhere in there did he say his father was a Muslim. If you're that hung up on that one sentence of a 16-page speech to the point where you disagree w/me that he was actually trying to say that, then I don't know what to tell you. I'm not even in the first argument. I am just pointing out that if he is really trying to connect to Islam through someone who deserted the faith, that is not very smart at all.
-
The Republican Thread
QUOTE (lostfan @ Jun 4, 2009 -> 12:37 PM) ??? That was like the absolute least relevant part (that his father was an atheist). That's why he didn't even bring it up and talked about his father's family instead. It doesn't matter really. Culturally that would be the most important part to a religion that tells us anyone who abandons Islam is supposed to die. If he is trying to connect with them through someone who deserted them, that would be the American equivalent of saying "Hey my great-great-great Grandfather used to own yours." Its a cultural taboo.
-
The Republican Thread
QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Jun 4, 2009 -> 12:35 PM) Somehow I doubt that all of Islam interprets the texts that way. It's the part that does that we need to marginalize. Its not easy to interpret this any other way really. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apostasy_in_I...e_death_penalty
-
The Republican Thread
QUOTE (Balta1701 @ Jun 4, 2009 -> 12:34 PM) If we're just throwing out insults, let me join in. There doesn't need to be a Republican thread either, just a posting of Glenn Beck's nightly show. It won't be any different than usual to be honest. Its gone on for eight years, why would it change now that the Dems are in power. They still can't laugh at themselves, so it isn't going to change.
-
The Republican Thread
QUOTE (lostfan @ Jun 4, 2009 -> 12:16 PM) In that part of his speech, he was talking about how he was familiar with the religion, how he's been exposed to their culture, and he understands what it means to be a Muslim etc. Yes, he was pointing out his father's religious background. Actually his father's family's religious background. That was the entire point of him bringing it up. Now, his father comes from a Muslim family, that's not really a secret, and then he later became an atheist. Nothing he said in that part of the speech contradicted anything he's previously said or changed his tone. It's quite obvious that some random talking head/blogger read that snippet and drew their own arbitrary conclusion to say "omg Obama is lying again lol." If that is actually what he meant, that is really bad. That is not going to help mend relations with Islam, because the worst possible thing you can do is desert the religion. That is a cause for death to his father.
-
The Republican Thread
QUOTE (BigSqwert @ Jun 4, 2009 -> 12:09 PM) Where did I claim I heard the speech? Talking about the talking point pundits. There doesn't even need to be a Democrat thread, just a link to the main liberal blogs.
-
The Republican Thread
QUOTE (BigSqwert @ Jun 4, 2009 -> 12:02 PM) It's not like he actually heard the speech. Just going off of pundit talking points. Irony.
-
Official 2008-2009 NBA Thread
QUOTE (kyyle23 @ Jun 4, 2009 -> 11:56 AM) If Tyler Hansbrough were black, he would be PJ Brown PJ Brown might be a top 5 pick in this s***pile of a draft.
-
What to do with Corkaroo?
I believe the only proper thing would be to unCork him.
-
Chicago Slayer vs. Oakland Athletic 6/4 Thread-1:05pm-CSN
QUOTE (Chisoxfn @ Jun 4, 2009 -> 11:34 AM) So guys, in yesterdays softball game I ended up playing 2nd the last couple innings (odd feat given I'm a lefty). But I started two DP's and turned another (boy was that tough). So I've decided the Sox should call me up. My defensive play will be legendary. Kinda like the Legend of Wilson Betemit?
-
Gordon Beckham Called Up
So Jake Peavy got 2000 posts, and Beckham has less than 500? For shame. :0)
-
2009 AL Central Thread
QUOTE (Jordan4life @ Jun 4, 2009 -> 11:15 AM) They'll never be as bad as the Pirates as long as they have Mauer and Morneau. But I see where you're getting at. Realistically, if they don't start hitting on some of the deals soon, the team will fall to the bottom of the division. Once that happens attendence historically falls to near nothing. If they get to the point of drawing 15,000 a night like they did in the late 90's, they won't be able to afford one, or both, of those guys.
-
Dream come true for Whisler
QUOTE (Chisoxfn @ Jun 4, 2009 -> 11:10 AM) For those that watched him, how did he look. What was his velocity, etc? He looks amped up and nervous. He had trouble finding the zone, especially against the first couple hitters. Velo was 91-92 on the top end, but he had nice movement. Solid is how I would score it. We'll see more in his next outings.
-
Dream come true for Whisler
http://mlb.mlb.com/news/article.jsp?ymd=20...rtnerId=rss_cws
-
2009 AL Central Thread
QUOTE (santo=dorf @ Jun 4, 2009 -> 05:40 AM) So the Twins traded Johan Santana, Matt Garza, and Jason Barlett for this: Delmon Young: .231/.272/.265 1 HR (barely got over the wall and BA would've had a chance at it,) 14 RBI's, 1 2B, 5 GIDP's, 41 K's in 117 at-bats Carlos Gomez: .217/.276/.302 0 HR, 4 RBI's, 4 SB, 3 CS, 26 K's in 106 at-bats The Twins could be a few years from a Pirates like existance if these are the types of trades they are pulling off. A big part of their success has been trading guys who were about to cost them large amounts of money, for guys that became cornerstones for the next five years. Their last few deal have been dismal, leaving them to depend entirely on their farms system and washed up bargain free agents. That is not a good formula for success.