Texsox

QUOTE(kapkomet @ Feb 7, 2008 -> 05:20 PM) Exactly! It's not being reported because they don't need to report the positive. It makes the GOP stronger. You know, just sayin' NUKE, HOW THE HELL ARE YOU? So you are in favor of the media gettng us interested in something?

QUOTE(Felix @ Feb 7, 2008 -> 03:56 PM) So what's next, we turn into the Colorado Rockies and start banning Playboy and Penthouse in the locker room? Sorry, but I think that's bulls***. People should be allowed to do what they want in the locker room, whether it be cursing, listening to music with parental advisory warnings, reading Playboy, or whatever, so long as it prepares them to perform on the field. If you're an adult (as all of these players are, including Josh Fields) and can't handle other people doing those sorts of things, you should really reevaluate your life. It's a workplace and subject to workplace rules. Why not place a copy of Playboy on your desk at school or at work.

QUOTE(YASNY @ Feb 7, 2008 -> 01:21 PM) I've had my say. I'm not going to get into it with you guys. Sure you will, not on this, but we're too old to stop being us No big surprise, but the mods and admins can fling poop better than anyone here. We can also trim the sails and keep an even keel. Sometimes we need that. It seems like this is the time. Peace.

QUOTE(southsider2k5 @ Feb 7, 2008 -> 02:26 PM) It will ask you a bunch of questions at the beginning, including if you have had any life changes in the last year (new house, job, baby etc). Based on those answers it will walk you through the forms you need, and it will compare whether the standard or itemized deductions are better in your specific case. I have used TaxCut by HR Block for 5-6 years now, and I love it. It is really simple to use. Last year I was really lazy and used H&R on-line. I assumed they used the same program. Now I'm wondering. The price was about the same.

This has inspired me. Looking over the voting, I am withdrawing from the race as funniest poster.

I'm the Huckebee of Soxtalk comedy

QUOTE(FlaSoxxJim @ Feb 7, 2008 -> 12:30 PM) Agreed. And with a spreadsheet set up, having different start dates for each Loser isn't hard. The relevant statistic of % weight loss over x number of days of dieting will be readily comparable regardless of when everybody started. I started at 275 pound like a couple weeks ago

QUOTE(YASNY @ Feb 7, 2008 -> 11:14 AM) That's in England. Hmm, big smile on his face . . .

QUOTE(YASNY @ Feb 7, 2008 -> 12:28 PM) Good point, but he'd need Romney to support him. On one hand, I can see Romney doing what is best for the conservative movement by endorsing Huckabee. On the other, I can't see him doing so when Huckabee wouldn't step aside for him as the conservative frontrunner. Will be interesting. Do you think they may be considering what is best for their careers The horrors! See what Hillary started

QUOTE(YASNY @ Feb 7, 2008 -> 11:12 AM) Agreed on the bias. It is an intriguing possibility though, and I wouldn't put it past any of them. I still expect us to be at war in Iran before Bush leaves office (if, in fact, he actually does). Just because it is biased doesn't mean it is wrong. Suspect, but not wrong. In fact some of the most rapid, crazies know so much they can be right for all the wrong reasons.

QUOTE(YASNY @ Feb 7, 2008 -> 12:23 PM) Which speaks volumes! I was backing him in 2000 on that side of the ticket. Now to get Obama nominated and then I don't care who wins.

QUOTE(YASNY @ Feb 7, 2008 -> 11:35 AM) I actually like that idea. BRB ... going to take my temperature. I likw it too, which is why it will never happen

This may be the first time my GOP pick actually received the nomination.

Now it's McCain v Huckebee to the death! Does McCain put it in cruise and wait for an opponent?

QUOTE(kapkomet @ Feb 7, 2008 -> 11:38 AM) Oh bulls***. Nobody cares, or at least no one cares that matters. I am so glad it distilled to that. Early one it seemed it was getting some traction and that would have been wrong

Another great example of why hate Hillary, how many other candidates do we judge by their spouses?

QUOTE(BigSqwert @ Feb 7, 2008 -> 11:25 AM) I'll believe this when I see it. Gore Vice President Gore He has the experience for the job.

At some point, I'm just not going to care who did use them. The next step will be pissed that Thomas didn't use them or maybe we win in 2000

QUOTE(witesoxfan @ Feb 7, 2008 -> 10:55 AM) I know, it's just funny when you use Aussie slang. You should start calling me out when I use American slang, so that way its not just a one-sided relationship where I make fun of you all the time. What was funny is I thought buggered had a more sexual meaning.

Even before we start, a couple other winners Southsider2k5 -- Biggest Hoosier Heads -- Biggest Boozer

QUOTE(YASNY @ Feb 7, 2008 -> 10:57 AM) Mods --- Please delete the above post. I forgot to include the link (I just happened across it) and now I can't find it to edit it in. If I do, I'll repost. Never mind. Here it is Serious anti-US-Israel bias in the article. Not saying he's wrong, but there is plenty fo scary stuff in there, except that it may be in retailation for high oil prices, I like that. Stop their porn until we have

I see you point, but you are missing mine. You have an opinion about their marriage. Do you have an equally strong opinion about any other candidates marriage? It is not as much what someone's opinion is to my point, but the fact that people have such strong opinions about Bill and Hillary's marriage. You are not the only one that talks about it. People fault her vigorously yet give Rudy G and three wives a pass. That is one of the questions that NSS was getting to in this thread. Why Hillary? and by extension, why Hillary and not the other candidates. BTW, I noticed that in the ten plus years since Monica-gate, there have not been any more whispers of cheating. Do you consider that at all? Perhaps they have repaired their relationship? You find fault that they are committed to helping each other succeed. Perhaps that is a bit old fashioned but I like seeing the spouses support the candidate. It's a rough job as President and having family support, I believe is important. I've been pointing out the double standard that people seem to have with the Clintons. Imagine if the Clintons adopted an African baby. I bet it would get much different treatment than McCain. There would be whispers of it actually being Bill's kid. Reporters tracking his travel schedule during the conception time frame, etc. And that one is easy to answer why Clinton and not the other candidates And as far as looking for Bin-Laden I think we employ people much better at this than the President. They work at agencies like the CIA, FBI, NSA, various branches of the military. So I don't think our efforts to track down Bin Laden were seriously impaired. And which candidate is not making decision on what is best for their career?

QUOTE(kapkomet @ Feb 7, 2008 -> 10:46 AM) Cone on Tex. It's not being talked about because the violence and such is down. Makes sense. We're only interested when there is violence. Seems like some people were blaming the media for only reporting the negative (violence) and not the postive. You know, just sayin'

I'd love a floor fight, the speeches will be amazing and embarrasing. Fights, stuff tossed.

Best voter story ever. But image if this was another state, say Florida, and it was say the 2000 election. Wow! That would be very interesting.