Texsox

QUOTE(southsider2k5 @ Sep 6, 2007 -> 01:41 PM) Actually I don't believe that I have ever said that the illegals are receiveing benefits. I have said they are burdening social services such as hospitals and jails, but I don't think I ever said anything about government benefits. You make it sound like every single illegal is here using someone else's social security card, paying taxes, and receiving social services. This is not the truth. If it were the truth, one in twenty five person's social security numbers in the whole country has been stolen. As I have stated in the past, anyone who is here committing that kind of fraud, should be deported instantly, and not allowed to return or become a citizen. So if they obtained a SS number they should be deported, and if they are working off the books, they should be deported *and* the company put out of business. So basically we should deport them all and bring in new. How do we afford that?

BTW Tom Delay would never be caught reaching under a stall. Hammer Time '08

QUOTE(BigSqwert @ Sep 6, 2007 -> 01:14 PM) To paraphrase Obama: Who had more experience than Cheney and Rumsfield and look what they did with the war on terror. Best ever: I do miss Reagan's quotes and smile.

QUOTE(FlaSoxxJim @ Sep 6, 2007 -> 12:57 PM) Did you ever see anything so adorable? friend of yours?

QUOTE(kapkomet @ Sep 6, 2007 -> 09:09 AM) I actually agree with this statement. Going on Leno to offically launch your campaign is just asinine and describes to a "T" the demeaning manner in which the office of the president has been dragged down to. It drags down my view of Sen. Thompson quite a bit, actually. He's now my "favorite" GOP candidate, but what he did is so cheap and it really bothers me. I'm trying to remember the last time one of these wasn't staged to a "T". At a firehouse, hometown crowds, etc. Since he has even less experience than Obama, I am certain he won't receive much traction from the GOP loyalists who used that as a reason not to support Obama. BTW, before someone gets their panies in a bunch, I agree the lack of experience is troubling for a candidate regardless of party.

QUOTE(southsider2k5 @ Sep 6, 2007 -> 12:32 PM) There are a ton of government programs out there. I detailed them a few posts ago. Illegals are not getting them. American citizens of the same bottom quartile economic situations are getting this aid. Off of the top of my head, and obviously not all inclusive or that everyone is on all of these... social security, unemployment, medicare, medicade, welfare, energy assistance, food stamps, public education, grant programs, earned income credit. Actually illegals are receiving those benefits, you've said so before. You have stated, and I have agreed, that it is costing the US a considerable sum in aid to illegals working low income jobs. (Those with forged documents, etc.) The only illegals not receiving aid are the ones working jobs "off the books". Once we put those "on the books" and no matter who works them, it's going to cost us. Perhaps this is when we cut back these programs for the working poor.

QUOTE(southsider2k5 @ Sep 6, 2007 -> 12:08 PM) Citizens are already here and factored into the equation. Illegals are here and not paid for. If they are legalized, they will be added to all of the federal programs they are able to receive. Why is that such a weird concept? If you have two children and pay their bills you have your budget. Then if your neighbor three kids decide to move in, and you decide to take care of them, you are now caring for five people, on basically the same budget. If you tell them to go back next door, then you are only paying for two people. So you are not refering to workers, just the unemployed? Where I am coming from is take those that are working, removing them and replacing them with citizens will not make a difference at all. When you talk about the bottom 4% of earners having a net income, I assume you were talking about workers ans in that situation it just doesn't matter. I've never been for allowing people without means of support come here. All immigration should be tied to jobs.

QUOTE(southsider2k5 @ Sep 6, 2007 -> 11:52 AM) So adding 12 million new people will not have an economic impact? Let's set aside the 12,000,000 number. As already noted, many of these workers have social security numbers and are already in the system. Of course it will. But how will filling those jobs with immigrants cost more than filling them with citizens?

http://www.firststreetonline.com/product.jsp?id=56396

QUOTE(Kid Gleason @ Sep 6, 2007 -> 11:25 AM) Maybe Bea will show up for a Strip-O-Gram!!! delete delte delete you bastard for getting that stuck in my head . . .

QUOTE(sox4lifeinPA @ Sep 6, 2007 -> 10:48 AM) that's not a puppet...that's just what it looks like your avatar's got a crotch shot of its own. Mine is what God intended, some some godless thing you posted. I guess you have to dress it up to keep it interesting for the missus

QUOTE(kapkomet @ Sep 6, 2007 -> 10:51 AM) Really? yep.

QUOTE(southsider2k5 @ Sep 6, 2007 -> 10:51 AM) The vast majority of illegal immigrants are people who are leaving bad situations. If they were rich, they probably wouldn't be coming here in the first place. Now, granted there are exceptions, but people who are leaving good situations are also the ones who can afford to go through the legal means to get here, so they aren't people who usually would factor into the 12 million people that are being discussed. Now I did notice you instantly turned this into a racial thing, why is that? If you want to discuss an issue that is one thing, but race baiting is played out. Not a race thing. What is the difference between a new immigrant working a $14,000 year job and a citizen. What additional benefits does an immigrant take that a citizen would not? We agree that the working poor consume more in benefits then they contribute. I just have never seen a difference between a lifelong citizen and a new immigrant in the economic impact.

QUOTE(kapkomet @ Sep 6, 2007 -> 10:52 AM) What? Oops, sorry, we do accept Judaism. But those crazy radical religions, we drop bombs on. Notice we have not bombed a Christian or Jewish country . . .

That is a very interesting issue facing China. And since, as Americans, we want every non-Christian religion destroyed, good for us.

QUOTE(sox4lifeinPA @ Sep 6, 2007 -> 10:42 AM) why don't you come back to my place and I'll help you figure it out *wink* ^^^^^^ Avatar Is that a creepy puppet in your lap or are you *ahh never mind*

QUOTE(Rex Kicka** @ Sep 6, 2007 -> 08:58 AM) I plan on celebrating this birthday like I celebrate all holidays, quietly sitting on the trunk of my car drinking a case of malt liquor in the parking lot. Thanks! Harkens back to the days of winoDJ

QUOTE(Rex Kicka** @ Sep 6, 2007 -> 09:05 AM) You know what? I don't buy this argument. I think there was little else the Senator was insinuating by playing footsie under a bathroom stall wall and passing his hand through the gap and creepily staring at the guy through the gap for several minutes. I like to think I'm as sex-positive as the next guy, but I don't believe that sex in public bathrooms should be legal, and I do think that propositioning someone to join them in the stall for sex is the same thing, especially when using established protocol to do so. The only thing wrong with what happened is that the Senator didn't get charged with the correct, more serious charge that he should have been charged with - and that was probably because of his influence as a Senator. Do those actions always result in public sex for willing partners, or could it result in "come back to my place"? I guess that is where I am still confused.

QUOTE(southsider2k5 @ Sep 6, 2007 -> 09:42 AM) Well according to most of the candidates from one particular party, things are incredibly bad for the people that are here already. There are no jobs, there is a horrible education system, the health system is crashing, the enviornment is dying, and so on and so forth, and that is just with the people who are already here. What would adding say another 10% of our population in poor people do to those failing systems? People who just assume since we had massive immigrations in the past, that we should be able to do it easily again, aren't paying very close attention to their history. Things have changed a wee bit in the US in the last 100-150 years or so. Remember, we have had a massive expansion of the Federal Government, and the role they play in people's lives, especially the lower classes of Americans. For example, during the Irish potato famine in the 19th century, there was no such thing as welfare, unemployment, medicare, medicade, social security, public education, earned income credit, etc. There also was no such thing as an income tax until the early 20th century. In other words it made no difference how many people you shoved in to the ghettos of New York, because the general poplulace felt no effect either way of millions of new immigrants. Today is a different story. As I have sited before in many posts, the bottom 40% of tax payers pay none, to actually profiting from our income tax system. This is before the cost of social services are even factored in. Its not like we are talking about the same situation as our past. No one wants to talk about how to pay for this. I have yet to see anyone, on either side of the aisle address this issue, at all. In fact many of the same people screaming about the current state of our country, are trying to add more people for the US to care for. Tell me, when your paycheck is stretched tight, do you go out and do the neighbors grocery shopping to while you are at it? Somehow I doubt it. We are importing software engineers, Doctors, etc. As far as the lowest paying jobs in this country, the economic impact of those jobs is the same if we have an immigrant working the job, or a citizen. The only way to lessen the economic hit is to employ an undocumented worker who will not apply for benefits, and no one wants that anymore. When Dems tried to raise the minimum wage, Reps went nuts, it will kill the business owner. Then when we start talking about how these lowest paying jobs do not contribute to the tax base, in fact they pull from it, no one has an answer. SS, here's the point that you have never addressed, what is the economic difference difference between Joe American working a landscape job earning $14,000 per year Juan New Legal Immigrant working the same job?

QUOTE(Alpha Dog @ Sep 6, 2007 -> 09:00 AM) I didn't say WE need to make them stop, they need to stop themselves. Tex, how come you don't have 30 kids? because you would go broke feeding them all. (plus, you would have to find a woman who would WANT to be pregnant for her whole adult life!). Somewhere you reached a limit where you had enough, and that limit probably coincided with the amount of people your family could support, whether that be monitarily or committment-wise, or both. I don't care what color you are, if you can't even take care of yourself, you shouldn't have kids. And that religious or biological answer is bulls***. It is just plain self-centered crap that because they WANT a baby, they should HAVE a baby. Well, if you have the child, take care of the child, don't force it on the rest of the world to support your vanity in having a child you couldn't care for, because you WANTED it. Condoms are cheaper than kids. They also talk back less, don't demand an allowance and won't crash the car after getting their drivers license. You have stated your case nicely, I will stop here. I find the right to reproduce an absolute for humans. You reduce it to a financial decision. So are you in favor of eliminating WIC, financial aid, public supported day care programs, public schools? We support children in dozens of different ways. You are complaining that we feed them, when we also will pay for their college? GMAB.

QUOTE(NorthSideSox72 @ Sep 6, 2007 -> 08:40 AM) That isn't proof of anything, other than the fact that Brownback is a marginal candidate. Do they really have to print a picture of a Mike Gravel crowd every time they print one of Brownback? I'd say you need a tinfoil hat, but it appears you already have one. They don't even cover Gravel's campaign

Happy Birthday!!

QUOTE(kapkomet @ Sep 6, 2007 -> 08:29 AM) The picture is linked in this thread. Pretty simple, actually. And how many pictures do we have to find of Dems in small crowds to disprove your claim? One? Twenty one?

QUOTE(Rex Kicka** @ Sep 6, 2007 -> 01:44 AM) All that does is make another cruisy bathroom somewhere in the airport happen. Arresting people for sex in public will stop sex in public - in general. And if they caught him having sex, I would agree on this case. When the cops start busting people for possible intent, and actions that *may* lead to a certain crime, we are on a slippery slope. Calling a hooker over to a car *may* lead to an illegal act, or it *may* lead to someone trying to help the person with food, clothing, shelter, etc. One is illegal, the other not. I don't like the police being in the position where they are claiming they *know* what another person is thinking and can have him arrested and convicted.

The drive to reproduce is deeply embedded in every animal I've studied. Some will find religious implications, some will just call it a biological fact. To stop poor people from reproducing is as ethically distasteful to me as stopping people with brown hair or below average intelligence. Perhaps to make it easier for them we could force sterilization on poor people?