Texsox

QUOTE(BearSox @ May 12, 2007 -> 01:25 PM) Dogs at the park >>>>>> fireworks You don't want to spook the dogs and have them s*** and piss all over the stadium.

Which coaching staff do you get? Walker could work some magic with that Cubs lineup . . .

QUOTE(Milkman delivers @ May 14, 2007 -> 03:52 PM) I'm not addicted at all. Once I realized some of the questions were flat out wrong, I didn't even have the desire to keep trying. Think of it as a memory test, it doesn't matter what the question/answers are.

QUOTE(Y2HH @ May 15, 2007 -> 07:51 AM) I was really far into the original game. I was half way through Naxx, I had completed Zul Gurub, Molten Core, Blackwing Lair, AQ20 and AQ40. I was decked in tier2 or better and wiped the floor with most people I encountered 1 on 1...it was like working toward a goal and being rewarded by becoming one of the strongest in the land -- I also decimated battlegrounds so much that the person below me had half the kills and damage dealt in the battle. Then Burning Crap came out and everyone with their non-epic greens and blues were just as strong -- if not stronger than me -- and did absolutly nothing to earn it. Meh. I'm level 70 -- still have a character that can hang, but I just got bored after all that time. How do you mention that on your resume?

QUOTE(southsider2k5 @ May 15, 2007 -> 07:59 AM) Historically, I don't think there will ever be a real change. There always seems to be a divide between the groups that are socially OK to look down on, and those that are protected. I don't see that changing. It hasn't for millenniums and in all societies. The groups change, but there is always another group to take their place. I just thought of this, we are arguably the greatest mix ever assembled on this planet. Perhaps it is amazing it has worked this well. (OK, the native Americans may disagree).

QUOTE(kapkomet @ May 14, 2007 -> 11:43 AM) His (lack of) substance at this point is by design. He will start to veer hard left before the primary and turn back if it looks like he has a chance to win the nomination. I think he has a huge challenge and it will be interesting as this plays out, but I just wish it was 9 months from now, and not now, if that makes sense. By hard left, do you mean to the middle? (He already is right of center) Part II I agree with Kap that Bush tried to do the right thing. I really think he allowed his morality and integrity to guide decisions. I see a lot of parallels with Carter. I also believe that while 9/11 was his brightest moment, it also was the beginning of a long terrible slide. And perhaps any other human would have also slid. Perhaps at that moment he realized that while he was the most powerful person on the planet, he was also just one person and the world is a large and dangerous place, that he would not be able to control. I just went back and read Kap's full post and noticed it was a Clinton v. Bush on personal morality and I have to back Kap even more. I do believe that with Clinton the prosoner abuse issue would have been settled along a much different path. But if I had to leave my kids with Dubya or Slick Willy for a week, I'd rather they be with Dubya.

QUOTE(SoxFan1 @ May 14, 2007 -> 09:21 PM) You should be fine if you have any visible facial hair. So his girlfriend can get in, can he?* I kid because, I thought that was funny. Maybe I care ™

QUOTE(southsider2k5 @ May 15, 2007 -> 07:00 AM) Which is fine. What isn't fine is foreign governments using us as a dumping ground for their unwanted citizens (ie namely poor and problematic) and then using our burgeoning social programs as a rallying cry against our country for propaganda purposes. I would be a supporter of a no immigration without jobs or non governmental support for the newly immigrated policy.

I hasn't considered that possibility before, of programming new stereotypes. I agree that appearance does come into the hiring process. So are you suggesting we need to have more, less, or the same diligence when issues like this come up, (when student groups do stuff like this)? I am wondering, from a practical standpoint, that there has to a critical mass of negative events before we start acting.

What consumer habit protests aren't stupid?

All good comments Mike, but I wonder if we aren't missing something in that definition. I think there needs some actual damages, some opportunity denied, access, promotions, perhaps violence against, and that body of human misdeeds before elevating. By comparing the histories of blacks, Hispanics, and blonds in this country, there are some stark contrasts. Maybe that is why we are less sensitive to blond or pollack jokes and more sensitive to black and Hispanic issues?

QUOTE(Alpha Dog @ May 14, 2007 -> 04:17 PM) If he raises whenever the price goes up, but lowers only when he refills his tanks and the price goes down, he would make a very hefty profit by the end of the year. When the station owners cry poor, not sure I believe them. He lowers it when the station across the street does. My mom is in the wholesale gas business, Kap is accurate.

QUOTE(kapkomet @ May 14, 2007 -> 09:45 PM) Thank you, sir, I do appreciate it. I think this is the best way to do it so we don't pollute Nuke's thread. I do wish he'd stop by and share what guys serving feel when they see their former Generals disagreeing with the Commander in Chief. BTW, from what I've seen votevets has been fairly moderate.

I'm stuck on the color chart thing. I can't see even something to click on for a wrong answer.

QUOTE(kapkomet @ May 14, 2007 -> 01:11 PM) Ok, so let me see... this is a thread to and for Nuke (and not a catch all thread, like you called it) so we can ask him questions and he can respond - and you're posting a political advertisement in here? C'mon. You can move it. No problem, I'll start a new thread. What I ment was I was looking for a catch all Iraq thread, this one was the only one going.

QUOTE(kapkomet @ May 14, 2007 -> 11:41 AM) There's only a million of them you dork. A catch-all, miscellaneous kind of place, it seemed too minor to start a thread. takes one to know one

QUOTE(sox4lifeinPA @ May 14, 2007 -> 11:59 AM) avalon.tomthefool.com it worked for me. I am getting married in 5 weeks. SC for the honeymoon (as if that mattered). We've got a house in the woods. I'm a manager at a bank. good times really. you? Divorce, beach house this summer with 300 of my favorite kids, college in the fall, life happens. Glad to hear the swoon MrsPA4Life hasn't changed her mind

Brain fart on the dam horse.

You tease Update, what's happening PA?

QUOTE(kapkomet @ May 14, 2007 -> 09:13 AM) ^^^^ Tex, I'll leave this here, but I question whether it should be in this thread. I was wondering where to put it. Do we have another Iraq war thread started? I didn't like it here either.

Dear VoteVets.org Supporter, Today, we are launching our second of three "Generals" ads. Last week, you made our historic ad featuring retired Major General John Batiste a smashing success. From when it launched on Wednesday, through the weekend, it was the talk of the news and discussion shows, and even featured in a Sunday New York Times story! Today, retired Major General Paul Eaton debuts in an ad, again taking on the false notion that the President listens to his commanders on the ground. See the ad here | Donate here Like General Batiste, General Eaton should know whether the President really listens to his commanders on the ground, or not. General Eaton recently retired from the US Army after more than 33 years service. His most recent operational assignment was Commanding General of the command charged with reestablishing Iraqi Security Forces from 2003-2004, where he built the command and established the structure and infrastructure for the Iraqi Armed Forces. Last week, President Bush kept maintaining that he bases his decisions on the war based on what he hears from commanders. Yet, for the second time in as many weeks, one of those commanders has decided to speak out and say it isn't so. The media is finally beginning to catch on - the President is not telling the truth. As General Eaton says in the ad, the President is being told we need more diplomacy in Iraq, not escalation - and the President is still not listening. We're taking that message into the states and districts of Senators Susan Collins and John Warner and Representatives Mary Bono, Mike Castle, Phil English, Jo Ann Emerson, Tim Johnson (IL), and Heather Wilson, Donate to keep these ads going here Do not doubt for a second that you are making a difference. Right after our ads began airing, four Congressional targets of the ads went to the White House as part of the "Gang of Eleven," who told the President that they are prepared to break with his failed strategy and start supporting the troops. With more pressure, even more Senators and Congressmen will do the same. Tomorrow, we're going to announce something that will rock the political world. I can't tell you what that is, yet, but check your email tomorrow morning to find out the bold move we're going to make with the help of your generous donations. It's going to be big. Thank you for all of your help in the last week. You are changing the very nature of this debate. Keep it going! Help VoteVets.org now! Thank you for supporting the Voice of America's 21st Century Patriots! Sincerely, Jon Soltz Iraq War Veteran Chairman and Co-Founder, VoteVets.org

QUOTE(Gregory Pratt @ May 13, 2007 -> 11:00 PM) Maximize his value. Why is it that everyone here understand when a Player has reached his maximized value, yet the professional GMs never see it and never see to pay for it?

QUOTE(BobDylan @ May 13, 2007 -> 08:57 PM) I wonder if they hire based on one's understanding of the differences between their, there, and they're. If so, you got no chance. QUOTE(Heads22 @ May 13, 2007 -> 09:39 PM) And than and then. You too are two much. Go two you're rooms. Write Know!!

I believe the word we should be suing is commercial property?

QUOTE(Rex Kicka** @ May 13, 2007 -> 09:26 PM) After just coming back from San Francisco, there is something disturbing about hearing the words "Castro" and "artificial anus" together. bastard QUOTE(kapkomet @ May 13, 2007 -> 10:10 PM) Because they want to come to America to have our (socialist) government take care of them. puke. And we welcome Cubans with open arms. Just wondering about other areas, how many retail shops, dry cleaners, etc. are owned by immigrants where you live? While it is easy to take a shot at immigrants just wanting to sponge off the taxpayers, I see a lot working their asses off starting businesses here.