Texsox

Now if he can figure out how to throw that 80% of the time that he wants to, he has a chance for a mlb career.

bandwagon jumping.

Crede + Masset = ??? or Crede + Danks = #3 starter Inquiring minds want to know . . .

sure you did. I think your porn contribution needs to stay. And if anyone is turned on by that pic, PM PA

QUOTE(FlaSoxxJim @ Mar 14, 2008 -> 11:50 AM) stop with the crazy talk already. Alcohol Is Your Friend Yes it is, I've even forgiven it for the whole "set me up with my first wife" episode

QUOTE(scenario @ Mar 14, 2008 -> 11:44 AM) LOL. Yeah, it may just be that they're realigning the rotation. But after watching the Sox work out Danks in a B game on an off-day, where every other regular had the day off... and having him get lit up... I guess I had my Oliver Stone glasses on. I'm not disagreeing, and I pray you are correct. But it seems they would just come out and say, we want to give Masset another start yada yada yada And putting on the Oliver Stone glasses. maybe a trade is in the works and Masset or Danks are part of it.

Nice article.

QUOTE(scenario @ Mar 14, 2008 -> 11:33 AM) IMO... I don't think this is about Buehrle... it's about Danks. I think they're concerned about something they see and they want to get another look at Masset starting. I wish that is the case. But if it has hooves and runs by the barn, think horse, not zebra.

QUOTE(evilmisquoter @ Mar 14, 2008 -> 11:31 AM) Ew. nicely played

QUOTE(FlaSoxxJim @ Mar 14, 2008 -> 01:35 AM) If only Zamfir had seen this flowchart in time. . . QUOTE(FlaSoxxJim @ Mar 14, 2008 -> 09:15 AM) What the heck are you all referring to? I don't think I'm seeing the image you're talking about. *You* posted it.

QUOTE(Jenksismyb**** @ Mar 14, 2008 -> 10:11 AM) Fair enough, but our entire legal system is based on the "buuuuttt your honor, jimmies judge told him that he could go out and play" logic. Precisely because things don't fit in a nice hierarchy we are forced to balance, weigh factors, and decide between course X and Y. It's a perfectly plausable, and logical, argument to use societies history of accepting alcohol as a legal drug to make the point that others should also be legal. Edit: And I totally agree that our "logic" behind making some of those determinations are often mindless and completely arbitrary. All good points. And I don't necessarily disagree with them. Perhaps this becomes more an issue of strategy? If we did go down that path, and use the comparisons between marijuana laws and alcohol, would it not be equally logical to conclude that we should ban alcohol, just like we ban marijuana?

QUOTE(striker62704 @ Mar 14, 2008 -> 09:39 AM) Was this on the prediction page? That's the only place I use javascript. registration page.

QUOTE(Jenksismyb**** @ Mar 14, 2008 -> 10:07 AM) lol, i have some friends who have very boring jobs, so they go onto these blogs that post stuff like this. It's good for me because I get all the good ones without searching through all the bad. I was thinking what would jenks type into google to return that search?

QUOTE(kyyle23 @ Mar 14, 2008 -> 09:06 AM) Joe isnt helping the situation batting .080 either. Tough situation, you have to play him to show his rehab progress, but want to hide that .080

The Sox stance and track record with Boras is going to keep making this difficult. Everyone in baseball knows the situation and will low ball.

QUOTE(NCsoxfan @ Mar 14, 2008 -> 08:43 AM) If Rowand REALLY wanted to play in Chicago he would of taken the 4 year contract... He's full of it Nothing in life is that simple. There are priorities and realities. I am certain there are a number of people here who would love to work for the Sox. Would they give up $75,000 jobs, homes, and college funds for their kids, to take a $15,000 intern job? Of course not. But I don't believe they are lying if they say they would like to work for the Sox. So we know that it isn't worth a few million dollars to Rowand to play with Joe. Hell, I'm not certain how many diamonds that would make Joe, but certailnly more than 7.

QUOTE(Alpha Dog @ Mar 14, 2008 -> 08:32 AM) What IS that? The pic of the day from Jim's porn collection

QUOTE(max power @ Mar 14, 2008 -> 08:12 AM) My opinion was blatantly misrepresented dozens of times in one post. I'm not going to let that happen and unfortunately you are doing it again right here by applying something I said before to my reaction to something said later. You took a post I spent 7.5 seconds on and did a great job of refutting in. I should have realized that someone here had studied this in depth and would expose me for the fraud I am. Relax, enjoy your moment in the sun

QUOTE(max power @ Mar 13, 2008 -> 02:26 PM) Not sure why you think I care so much.

QUOTE(FlaSoxxJim @ Mar 13, 2008 -> 06:48 PM) Get in. Get out. Get a sammich. Ladies Man, that's what I am.

The money quote from the story: Mr. Whipple OMG, that is just too good

There is also a script running that my browser rejected. Not uncommon, but something to be aware of.

QUOTE(Jenksismyb**** @ Mar 13, 2008 -> 06:25 PM) Hilarious Hey Jenks, how did you find that gem?

I'm looking at the reunion website and thinking, who the hell are most of these people?

Couple of things in case people were wondering. Asked first He has a number of posts here, not registering only to promote some site. Asked first Seemed like a great application that members would be interested in Did I mention he asked first? Not a direct copy of soxtalk Yeah, he asked.