July 21, 20178 yr O'Neill, the #29 prospect in baseball, has been traded to St. Louis for LHP Marco Gonzales per the Mariners Twitter account.
July 21, 20178 yr Author If this is all it took for such a prospect, we could've given them David Holmberg or Swarzak or something. An unbelievably lopsided trade.
July 21, 20178 yr Gonzales was as high as a top 50 prospect a couple years back, and has been very good in AAA this year, but this seems strange.
July 21, 20178 yr QUOTE (Jose Abreu @ Jul 21, 2017 -> 09:54 AM) If this is all it took for such a prospect, we could've given them David Holmberg or Swarzak or something. An unbelievably lopsided trade. Yeah, Holmberg might be a reasonable comparison.
July 21, 20178 yr Author Cards fans online are speculating that they may be looking to flip O'Neill, however
July 21, 20178 yr i mean... oneil isnt the coolest thing on the planet but hes a legit prospect... we couldnt give gonzo + swarzek + whatever for that? marco gonzalez is a 4/5 sp at best... this screams seattle not talking to others about this and settling for the first thing that came their way
July 21, 20178 yr Ok, I stand a touch corrected. Gonzales has been good since his injury and this seems like a decent trade. From SEA prospective, they are getting a former first round pick who after his injury is doing really well. From ST Louis they get a top prospect or a trade chip.
July 21, 20178 yr Totally feels like a flip is coming. They've got Bader and like 5 former top prospects plus Fowler already in that OF. Could just be a buy-low on O'Neill taking advantage of the Mariners desperation, but I don't see them sitting on all those guys. Guessing a cost-controlled bat because the starting staff is loaded.
July 21, 20178 yr After reading Longenhagen's writeup on O'Neill this doesn't seem as bad, I don't think anyone else but MLB.com considers him anything close to a top 30 prospect, and I think with this trade it's clear the Mariners don't either. Edited July 21, 20178 yr by OmarComing25
July 21, 20178 yr Could also see someone like Grichuk or Piscotty get moved in a change of scenery type of move. Both have struggled. Edited July 21, 20178 yr by soxfan2014
July 21, 20178 yr Author QUOTE (Username @ Jul 21, 2017 -> 12:16 PM) Totally feels like a flip is coming. They've got Bader and like 5 former top prospects plus Fowler already in that OF. Could just be a buy-low on O'Neill taking advantage of the Mariners desperation, but I don't see them sitting on all those guys. Guessing a cost-controlled bat because the starting staff is loaded. But regardless of how much the Mariners may have soured on O'Neill, it's still puzzling that they couldn't have gotten a better return, especially from us.
July 21, 20178 yr O'Neil isn't even on BA's updated top 100. Though I do like this trade for the Cards.
July 21, 20178 yr QUOTE (Jose Abreu @ Jul 21, 2017 -> 12:20 PM) But regardless of how much the Mariners may have soured on O'Neill, it's still puzzling that they couldn't have gotten a better return, especially from us. Definitely agree on that. Though people are probably a bit too low on Gonzalez. Either way, feels unnecessary for the Cards unless they're making another move. 40 man crunch will be a big problem otherwise.
July 21, 20178 yr What's the reason Seattle would have soured on Tyler? His numbers seem decent enough every stop. Edited July 21, 20178 yr by Rowand44
July 21, 20178 yr QUOTE (Rowand44 @ Jul 21, 2017 -> 12:02 PM) What's the reason Seattle would have soured on Tyler? His numbers seem decent enough every stop. This is the million dollar question--sometimes there is a lot more to the story that moves a team to trade someone in what seems to be a lopsided deal. Sometimes personal reasons come in to play--sometimes it's a maturity thing, wants to be closer to home--misses mommy--there's a world of human element that factors into a players' future with the team that gets blocked by the numbers.
July 21, 20178 yr Tyler had a 27% K-rate in AAA and averaged higher for most of his minor league career. My trading philosophy on prospects with high K-rates is get what you can when you can get it, there's a overwhelmingly high chance this kid will never be a productive major league hitter.
July 21, 20178 yr QUOTE (OmarComing25 @ Jul 21, 2017 -> 12:17 PM) After reading Longenhagen's writeup on O'Neill this doesn't seem as bad, I don't think anyone else but MLB.com considers him anything close to a top 30 prospect, and I think with this trade it's clear the Mariners don't either. Plus pitching, especially LHP is always more valuable then hitting. One for one it's not a bad trade. O'neill's stats really don't bear any superstar potential.
July 22, 20178 yr QUOTE (mac9001 @ Jul 21, 2017 -> 01:07 PM) Tyler had a 27% K-rate in AAA and averaged higher for most of his minor league career. My trading philosophy on prospects with high K-rates is get what you can when you can get it, there's a overwhelmingly high chance this kid will never be a productive major league hitter. How do you feel about Moncada then ?
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.